ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
This paper empirically investigated the impact of institutional ownership on corporate environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) performance among Chinese listed firms between 2011 and 2022, taking into account the moderating effect of board gender diversity. The empirical results indicated that institutional ownership has a positive impact on corporate ESG performance. Moreover, the relationship between institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance was positively moderated by board gender diversity. The findings demonstrated that institutional ownership and board gender diversity can alleviate firms’ resource constraints by providing resource support, enabling firms to engage more actively in ESG practices. Consequently, enhances their ESG performance. The combination of sufficient financial resources and diverse human capital can create a competitive advantage for enhancing corporate ESG performance, which provides guidance to firms and policymakers on how to promote corporate sustainable development in China.
Abdelkader, M. G., Gao, Y., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG performance: The mediating role of temporal orientation in South Africa context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440, 140728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140728
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Guerrero-Villegas, J., Vidal-Salazar, M. D., & Delgado-Márquez, B. L. (2014). International cultural diversification and corporate social performance in multinational enterprises: The role of slack financial resources. Management International Review, 55(3), 323–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0225-4
Akbar, A., Jiang, X., Qureshi, M. A., & Akbar, M. (2021). Does corporate environmental investment impede financial performance of Chinese enterprises? The moderating role of financial constraints. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(41), 58007–58017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14736-2
Al-Mamun, A., & Seamer, M. (2020). Board of director attributes and CSR engagement in emerging economy firms: Evidence from across Asia. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100749
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2019). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
Aydo?mu?, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Hirst, S. (2017). The agency problems of institutional investors. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.3.89
Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network Learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892
Belcher, A. (2020). Board diversity: Can sex discrimination law help? Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 56(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v56i3.806
Chebbi, K., & Ammer, M. A. (2022). Board Composition and ESG disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The moderating role of Corporate governance reforms. Sustainability, 14(19), 12173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912173
Chen, H.-L., Hsu, W.-T., & Chang, C.-Y. (2013). Family ownership, institutional ownership, and internationalization of SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12031
Chen, J. (2024). Sustainable Economic development in China: Balancing growth and environmental concerns. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 2574–2580. https://doi.org/10.61707/ajhsj891
Chen, Y., Ren, Y.-S., Narayan, S., & Huynh, N. Q. A. (2024). Does climate risk impact firms’ ESG performance? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.028
Cheng, Q., Du, F., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2016). Seeing is believing: Analysts’ corporate site visits. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(4), 1245–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9368-9
Cho, J., & Ryu, H. (2022). Impact of managerial ownership on corporate social responsibility in Korea. Sustainability, 14(9), 5347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095347
Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, Y., & Zouari, G. (2021). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: Evidence from ESG European companies. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2020-0121
Chu, S., Oldford, E., & Wang, J. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and corporate fraud in China: The perspective of moderating effect of board gender diversity. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 1582–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.062
Collins, R., & Blau, P. M. (1979). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Social Forces, 58(2), 677. https://doi.org/10.2307/2577612
Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1771–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.006
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
Du, P., Huang, S., Hong, Y., & Wu, W. (2022). Can FinTech improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance?—A study based on the dual path of internal financing constraints and external fiscal incentives. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1061454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1061454
Elnahass, M., Alharbi, R., Mohamed, T. S., & McLaren, J. (2023). The Nexus among board diversity and bank stability: Implications from gender, nationality and education. Emerging Markets Review, 57, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101071
Erhemjamts, O., & Huang, K. (2019). Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. Journal of Business Research, 105, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.037
Gallo, P. J., & Christensen, L. J. (2011). Firm Size Matters: An Empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on Sustainability-Related Behaviors. Business & Society, 50(2), 315–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398784
García-Meca, E., López-Iturriaga, F., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2015). Institutional investors on boards: Does their behavior influence corporate finance? Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2882-z
Han, H. (2022). Does increasing the QFII quota promote Chinese institutional investors to drive ESG? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(6), 1627–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2022.2156362
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
Hendershott, T., Livdan, D., & Schürhoff, N. (2015). Are institutions informed about news? Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), 249–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.03.007
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to Environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
Huang, Y., & Li, S. (2024). Female directors, ESG performance and enterprise financialization. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105266
Issa, A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: The power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-03-2023-0053
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jia, F., Li, Y., Cao, L., Hu, L., & Xu, B. (2022). Institutional shareholders and firm ESG performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(22), 14674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214674
Jun, C., Qiyuan, L., Xiaofang, M., & Zhang, F. (Frank). (2023). Board gender diversity and cost of equity: Evidence from mandatory female board representation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.031
Katmon, N., Mohamad, Z. Z., Norwani, N. M., & Farooque, O. A. (2017). Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 447–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
Kim, J.-B., & Yi, C. H. (2015). Foreign versus domestic institutional investors in emerging markets: Who contributes more to firm-specific information flow? China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.01.001
Kyaw, K., Olugbode, M., & Petracci, B. (2017). Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(5), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2016-0183
Lavin, J. F., & Montecinos-Pearce, A. A. (2021). ESG disclosure in an emerging market: An empirical analysis of the influence of board characteristics and ownership structure. Sustainability, 13(19), 10498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910498
Lewellyn, K., & Muller-Kahle, M. (2024). ESG leaders or laggards? A configurational analysis of ESG performance. Business & Society, 63(5), 1149–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503231182688
Li, H., Guo, H., Hao, X., & Zhang, X. (2023). The ESG rating, spillover of ESG ratings, and stock return: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 80, 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102091
Li, R., Zhu, Z., & Wang, X. (2023). Pension insurance contributions and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104638
Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12487
Lin, Y. R., & Fu, X. M. (2017). Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 17–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.01.021
Liu, X., & Wan, D. (2023). Retail investor trading and ESG pricing in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101911
Liu, Y., Jin, X. M., Ly, K. C., & Mai, Y. (2024). The relationship between heterogeneous institutional investors’ shareholdings and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 71, 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102457
Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B., & Sun, Y. (2023). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, bse.3494. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494
Ma, Y., Ahmad, M. I., & Torelli, R. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: The moderating role of audit committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2895, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2895
Meng, T., Dato Haji Yahya, M. H., Ashhari, Z. M., & Yu, D. (2023). ESG performance, investor attention, and company reputation: Threshold model analysis based on panel data from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 9(10), e20974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20974
Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Italian Banking Sector. Sustainability, 14(20), 13447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013447
Miao, S., Tuo, Y., Zhang, X., & Hou, X. (2023). Green Fiscal Policy and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Energy-Saving and Emission-Reduction Policy in China. Energies, 16(9), 3667. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093667
Miller, T., & Del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
Mu, W., Liu, K., Tao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103426
Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727
Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2017). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian Securities Exchange listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 874–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.141
Ning, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Does digital finance improve corporate ESG performance? An intermediary role based on financing constraints. Sustainability, 15(13), 10685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310685
Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664–1676. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1915
Ortas, E., Gallego?Álvarez, I., & Álvarez, I. (2018). National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1706
Peng, H., Zhang, Z., Goodell, J. W., & Li, M. (2023). Socially responsible investing: Is it for real or just for show? International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102553
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393956
Pfeffer, J., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1979). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Contemporary Sociology, 8(4), 612. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065200
Samara, I., Nandakumar, M. K., O’Regan, N., & Almoumani, H. M. (2022). Governance diversity: Its impact on strategic variation and results. Strategic Change, 32(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2534
Sun, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Responsible investment: Institutional shareholders and ESG performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 85, 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102357
Tian, Z., Zhu, B., & Lu, Y. (2023). The governance of non-state shareholders and corporate ESG: Empirical evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104162
Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714
Valls Martínez, M. D. C., Martín-Cervantes, P. A., & Miralles-Quirós, M. D. M. (2021). Sustainable development and the limits of gender policies on corporate boards in Europe. A comparative analysis between developed and emerging markets. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100168
Van Der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00320
Wang, C., Lok, C.-L., & Phua, L. K. (2023). Ownership structure and capital structure: Moderating effect of product market maturity. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231218787. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218787
Wang, D., Peng, K., Tang, K., & Wu, Y. (2022). Does FinTech development enhance corporate ESG performance? Evidence from an emerging market. Sustainability, 14(24), 16597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416597
Wang, Y., Ones, D. S., Yazar, Y., & Mete, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and organizational environmental performance: An international perspective. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 5, 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100164
Wei, F., & Zhou, L. (2024). Do state-owned enterprises prefer capital from private enterprises with better ESG performance? Evidence from China’s mixed ownership reforms. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105067
Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2015). The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): Do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, 23(4), 298–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1071464
Xu, Q., & Kim, T. (2021). Financial constraints and corporate environmental policies. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(2), 576–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab056
Xue, Q., Wang, H., Ji, X., & Wei, J. (2023). Local government centralization and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China’s county-to-district reform. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(3), 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100314
Yan, J., Huang, Y., & Liao, X. (2024). Help or hindrance? The impact of female executives on corporate ESG performance in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140614
Yang, H., & Xue, K. (2023). Board diversity and the marginal value of corporate cash holdings. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102048
Yao, R., Fei, Y., Wang, Z., Yao, X., & Yang, S. (2023). The impact of China’s ETS on corporate green governance based on the perspective of corporate ESG performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032292
Yin, X.-N., Li, J.-P., & Su, C.-W. (2023). How does ESG performance affect stock returns? Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 9(5), e16320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16320
Zahid, R. M. A., Saleem, A., & Maqsood, U. S. (2023). ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: Empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 44086–44099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25345-6
Zaid, M. A. A., Abuhijleh, S. T. F., & Pucheta?Martínez, M. C. (2020). Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1888
Zhang, J., Li, Y., Xu, H., & Ding, Y. (2023). Can ESG ratings mitigate managerial myopia? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102878
Zhang, N., Zhang, Y., & Zong, Z. (2023). Fund ESG performance and downside risk: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102526
Zhao, Q., Li, X., & Li, S. (2023). Analyzing the relationship between digital transformation strategy and ESG performance in large manufacturing enterprises: The Mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15(13), 9998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139998
Zhao, X., & Cai, L. (2023). Digital transformation and corporate ESG: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104310
Zhou, W., & Lok, C.-L. (2024). Does Board Gender Diversity Moderate the Relationship between Institutional Ownership and ESG Performance? Evidence from China. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 14(4), 449–466.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
2025 © Copyright HRMARS. All rights Reserved.