ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
The adoption of digital technology is considered as one of the best initiatives undertaken by the government to deter instances of corruption that are well-perceived by the public to plaguing public sector, especially within developing and third world countries. The move is expected to improve the level of security in all public transactions while enhancing coordination to boost anti-corruption initiatives. Nevertheless, despite embracing digitalisation extensively, many corruption cases still take place within public sector in Malaysia, which require further investigation. By referring to Institutional Theory, the scope of this study looks from the perspective of public sector’s organisational culture to determine its influence on corruption deterrence using digital technology. This study investigates whether the following factors (digitalization policy; organizational vision and mission; beliefs and behaviours of public servants) influence digital technology effectiveness in deterring corruption within public sector. This study employs sample comprising of 140 auditors from 774 public officials of National Audit Department headquarter, using simple random sampling. Questionnaires were distributed and responses were analysed using descriptive, correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results revealed all three factors (digitalization policy; organizational vision and mission; beliefs and behaviours of public servants) significantly influence digital technology effectiveness in deterring potential corruption within public sector. The findings of this study recommends further strategic approach to be undertaken by public sector involving extensive digital policies formulation, synchronizing organisational vision and mission statement with integrity-based actions, and cultivating supportive individual beliefs and behaviours to effectively leverage technology in curbing corruption.
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Addo, A., and Senyo, P. (2020). Digitalization and government corruption in developing countries: towards a framework and research agenda. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020(1), 16765. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.16765
Adebisi, A. J., and Guermat, C. (2022). Comparative analysis of the impact of big data on corruption in selected developing and developed countries. European Journal of Information Technologies and Computer Science, 2(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.24018/compute.2022.2.3.64
Ahmad, A. A., Johari, R. J., Razali, F. M., Rashid, N., & Musyaffi, A. M. (2023). Corruption occurrences in the public sector agency: Malaysia evidence. Review of Economics and Finance, 21, 1342–1349. https://refpress.org/ref-vol21-a146/
Ali, N. A. M., Majid, R. A., Basri, S. A., Abdullah, Z., & Shah, M. A. M. M. (2022). Profiling fraudsters: empirical evidence from the malaysian anti-corruption commission website. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i12/15756
Bodó, B., & Janssen, H. (2022). Maintaining trust in a technologized public sector. Policy and Society, 41(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac019
Bo?a-Avram, C. (2024). Examining the white and dark sides of digitalisation effects on corruption: unveiling research patterns and insights for future research. The Journal of Risk Finance, 25(2), 181-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-10-2023-0256
Business at OECD. (2022). Stepping up the game: Digital technologies for the promotion of the fight against corruption, a business perspective. https://www.businessatoecd.org/blog/stepping-up-the-game
Cappelli, L., Pisano, A., Iannucci, E., Papetti, P., D’Ascenzo, F., & Ruggieri, R. (2023). Digitalization and prevention of corruption: opportunities and risks—some evidence from the italian university system. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3332
Cárdenas, G. and González, R. V. (2022). Mapping of clusters about the relationship between e-government and corruption in mexico. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(2), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-05-2022-0064
Chen, Y., Li, R., & Song, T. (2023). Does tmt internationalization promote corporate digital transformation? a study based on the cognitive process mechanism. Business Process Management Journal, 29(2), 309-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2021-0376
Coldwell, D. (2019). Negative influences of the 4th industrial revolution on the workplace: towards a theoretical model of entropic citizen behavior in toxic organizations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152670
Deliversky, J. (2016). Why is corruption in the healthcare sector in bulgaria so common?. Journal of Medical and Dental Practice, 3(1), 394-397. https://doi.org/10.18044/medinform.201631.394
Deploying emerging technology to fight corruption. (2023, January 13). IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/building-trust-ethics/discussion/deploying-emerging-technology-fight-corruption
Do, T., and Kasper, E. (2022). The impact of covid-19 response policies on select vulnerable groups in vietnam.. https://doi.org/10.19088/ids.2022.038
Ferina, I., Mulyani, S., Afia, N., & Poulus, S. (2021). The zero fraud implementation through the innovation of information technology and organizational culture. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.1.30
Hoa, N. T. T., and Thanh, N. N. (2023). Factors affecting corruption control in public administration: evidence from vietnam. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e1636. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.1636
Hyytinen, A., Tuimala, J., & Hammar, M. (2022a). Enhancing the adoption of digital public services: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101687
Ibrahimy, M., Virkus, S., & Norta, A. (2023). The role of e-government in reducing corruption and enhancing transparency in the afghan public sector: a case study. Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 17(3), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-10-2022-0135
Johari, R. J., Alam, M. M., & Said, J. (2020). Empirical assessment on factors contributing to integrity practices of malaysian public sector officers. Business Process Management Journal, 27(4), 1217-1237. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2020-0297
Khvedelidze, T., Toleubekova, B., & Saylibaeva, Z. (2022). New zones of corruption risk in higher education because of the manipulation of digital technologies. SHS Web of Conferences, 141, 03010. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214103010
Kim, C. (2013). Anti-Corruption Initiatives and E-Government: A Cross-National Study. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0223-1
Kouladoum, J. (2022). Technology and control of corruption in africa. Journal of International Development, 35(6), 1163-1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3723
Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2004). Applied linear statistical model (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin. ISBN0071122214, 9780071122214.
Lei, S., Zhang, X., & Liu, H. (2021). Digital technology adoption, digital dynamic capability, and digital transformation performance of textile industry: moderating role of digital innovation orientation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 2038-2054. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3507
Lekhawipat, W., Yu, W., & Lin, C. (2018). How internal attributions affect knowledge sharing behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 867-886. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2017-0081
Mackey, T., and Cuomo, R. (2020). An interdisciplinary review of digital technologies to facilitate anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in medicines procurement. Global Health Action, 13(sup1), 1695241. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1695241
Mackey, T., and Nayyar, G. (2017). A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 16(5), 587-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2017.1313227
Mahmud, N. M., Mohamed, I. S., & Arshad, R. (2021). The supply-side of corruption: a review of scenario, causes and prevention measure. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-06-2021-0120
Majid, R. A., Basri, S. A., Dollah, A. D. M. @., & Shah, M. A. M. M. (2022). State governments: constructing fortifications against fraudulent activities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i11/15024
Martins, J., Veiga, L., & Fernandes, B. (2023). Are electronic government innovations helpful to deter corruption? evidence from across the world. Economics and Politics, 35(3), 1177-1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12255
Merhi, M. I., & Ahluwalia, P. (2018). Digital Economy and Corruption Perceptions: A Cross-Country Analysis. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18(2), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v18_2
Mutungi, F., Baguma, R., Ejiri, A. H., & Janowski, T. (2021). Digital Anti-Corruption Typology for Public Service delivery. International Journal of Computer Applications, 174(20), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2021921089
Naswir, R. Y., Maarop, N., Hasan, M., Daud, S. M., Samy, G. N., & Magalingam, P. (2019). Towards a conceptual model to evaluate usability of digital government services in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100438
Nawaz, A., Soomro, S., Batool, S., Rani, H., & Aslam, A. (2022). A moderated mediation effect of symbolic and substantive preventive actions on employees’ preventive behavior in the context of covid?19. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 23(1), 106-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12337
OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 7). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en
Ogunlela, O., Olabode, O., & Robertson, T. (2021). Blockchain technology as a panacea for procurement corruption in digital era. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(4), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1222
Ouedraogo, R., & Sy, A. (2020). Can digitalization help deter corruption in Africa? IMF Working Paper, 20(68). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513545691.001
Park, C., and Kim, K. (2019). E-government as an anti-corruption tool: panel data analysis across countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4), 691-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318822055
Poufinas, T., Laskareli, A., & Agiropoulos, C. (2023). Decreasing corruption and increasing competitiveness through e-government. Theoretical Economics Letters, 13(02), 310-331. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2023.132020
Ramadhan, D. (2022). Strengthening integrity and fraud awareness in preventing fraud during the covid-19 pandemic. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 7(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v7i2.266
Rathnasekara, K., Suraweera, N., & Yatigammana, K. (2023). The impact of self-efficacy beliefs of employees on contextual issues of online learning: with reference to the banking sector in sri lanka. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 18(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-12-2022-0177
Rawashdeh, A., and Rawashdeh, B. S. (2023). The effect cloud accounting adoption on organizational performance in smes. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.9.005
Rhoades, L., and Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
Rosnidah, I., Sulistyowati, W. A., Yulianto, A., & Siswoyo, M. (2020). Study of corruption occurrence based on religiosity, ethical orientation, and behavioral orientation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Accounting, Management and Entrepreneurship (ICAMER 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200305.020
Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022a). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680
Sarker, S., Henningsson, S., Jensen, T., & Hedman, J. (2021). The use of blockchain as a resource for combating corruption in global shipping: an interpretive case study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(2), 338-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1912919
Shenkoya, T. (2022). Can digital transformation improve transparency and accountability of public governance in Nigeria? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-08-2022-0115
Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia. (2021). MACC achievements. https://www.sprm.gov.my/index.php?page_id=103&contentid=1702&cat=BKH&language=en
Tajudeen, F. P., Nadarajah, D., Jaafar, N. I., & Sulaiman, A. (2021). The impact of digitalisation vision and information technology on organisations' innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 607-629. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-10-2020-0423
Thompson, P. and Bolino, M. (2018). Negative beliefs about accepting coworker help: implications for employee attitudes, job performance, and reputation.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000300
Rosli, N. B., & Kamal, M. E. B. M. (2024). Factors Influencing Digital Technology Effectiveness in Combating Corruption within Malaysian Public Sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 14(4), 1405–1425.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode