ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
With globalization, competition between countries, regions and industries has become more intense and complex. The concept of clustering, first expressed by Marshall in 1890 as industrial concentrations; is seen as a tool for ensuring national, regional and local competitiveness, innovation and development. Clustering, which began in the 1960s with the development of the regions where small firms with a tendency to cooperate technologically and strategically in Europe was concentrated in certain industrial regions, came up again in the 1990s with the diamond model which was included in the Porter's work called ‘International Competitive Advantage’. The aim of this study is to investigate the clustering potential areas in the TR 32 region and their effects on regional competitive advantage. For this purpose, three star analysis, which is generally carried out on employment numbers, was used to define the sectors. Results of the study shows the existence of areas with clustering potential and their competitive advantage both regionally and nationally in Ayd?n, Denizli and Mu?la provinces.
1. Andersson, T., Schwaag-Serger, S., Sorvik, J. & Hansson, E. W. (2004). The cluster policies whitebook. 49, pp. 371-402.
2. Arslan, M. (2018). TRC2 (Diyarbak?r-?anl?urfa) bölgesi kümelenme potansiyeli analizi. Al-Farabi Uluslararas? Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2 (1), pp. 32-53.
3. Ayd?ner, M. (2015). Te?vik sistemi kapsam?ndaki yat?r?mlar?n ihracata ve istihdama etkisi: TR32 bölgesi üzerine bir de?erlendirme. Küresel ?ktisat ve ??letme Çal??malar? Dergisi. 4 (8), pp. 74-87.
4. Barkley, D. L. & Henry, M. S. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of targeting industry clusters. Clemson, South Carolina: Clemson University Public Service Activities. pp. 1-11.
5. Bozkurto?lu, S. (2013). Kümelenme Modeli ve Türkiye’de Kümelenme Çal??malar?. ?zmir: ?zmir Ticaret Odas?.
6. Braunerhjelm, P. & Carlsson, B. (1999). Industry Clusters in Ohio and Sweden, 1975-1995. Small Business Economics, 12 (4), pp. 279-293.
7. Ceyhan, M.S. ve Özcan, S. Ö. (2018). Bölgesel kalk?nmada kümelenmenin rolü: Bart?n ili ayakkab?c?l?k sektörü örne?i. A?BÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 18 (1). 141-163.
8. Cortright, J. (2006). Making Sense of Cluters: Regional Competitiveness and Economic Devolopment. The Brookings Institution.
9. DTM. (2008). Beyaz Kitap: Türkiye’de kümelenme politikas?n?n geli?tirilmesi. Ankara: D?? Ticaret Mü?te?arl???.
10. Erkek, D. ve Öselmi?, G. (2011). TR32 Düzey 2 Bölgesi’nde kümelenme yakla??m?. GEKA.
11. Demirdö?en, S. (2013). ??letmeler için kümelenmenin önemi ve kümelenme için uygun sektörün belirlenmesi: Erzincan ili üzerine bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal bilimler enstitüsü i?letme anabilim dal?, Yay?mlanmam?? yüksek lisans tezi. Erzurum.
12. Erkut, F. Ç. (2011). Kümelenme ve Ayd?n ilindeki kümelenme potansiyeli olan alanlar. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal bilimler enstitüsü i?letme anabilim dal?, Yay?mlanmam?? yüksek lisans tezi. Ayd?n.
13. ?zmir Kalk?nma Ajans? (2010). ?zmir kümelenme analizi. (?ZKA, Eri?im, 20.06.2018).
14. Kaygalak, ?. ve Karada?, A. (2010). Türkiye’de sanayi kümelerini tan?mlama ve belirleme sorunu. Üniversite sanayi i?birli?i Ulusal Kongresi, ODTÜ Ankara.
15. Koç, M. ve Özbozkurt, O. B. (2014). Uluslar?n rekabet üstünlü?ü ve Elmas modeli üzerine bir de?erlendirme. ??letme ve ?ktisat Çal??malar? Dergisi. 2 (3), pp. 85-91.
16. Krugman, P.(1999). The Role of Geography in Development. International Regional Science Review, 22 (2), pp. 142-161.
17. Kuah, A. T. (2002). Cluster theory and practice: Advantages for the small business locating in a vibrant cluster. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 4 (3), pp. 206-228.
18. Obadic, A. (2015). Cluster development and mapping process in Croatia. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 529.
19. Perroux, F. (1950). Economic Space: Theory and Applications. Oxford Journals, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (1), pp. 89-104.
20. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review.
21. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review.
22. Porter, (2000). “Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy”. Econom?c Development Quarterly, 14 (1), pp. 15-34.
23. Roelandt, T. & P. den Hertog (1999). Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making in OECD-countries, forthcoming at the OECD in 1999.
24. Sar?ta?, A. ve Tunca, M. Z. (2017). Porter modeline dayal? sektörel kümeleme analizi: Bat? Akdeniz bölgesinde bir uygulama. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 9 (18), pp. 82-97.
25. Sun, Z. ve Perry, M. (2008). The role of trading cities in the development of Chinese business cluster. International Business Research. 1 (2), pp. 69-81.
26. ?en, Ö. Ve Sandal E. K. (2017). Gaziantep ilinde üç y?ld?z analizi yöntemi ile endüstriyel kümelenme analizi. Do?u Co?rafya Dergisi, 22 (38), pp. 39-62.
27. Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago, IL: University
To cite this article: Iyem, C., Ozturk, D.G., Y?ld?z, F.Z. (2018). Clustering and Clustering Potential in TR 32 Regions Province, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (3): 336-345.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode