Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Post-Occupancy Evaluation for Green Building in Kuala Lumpur

MA Hassin, Siti Nur Hasibah Binti Azlani

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i8/4942

Open access

Green building in Malaysia kept rising from year to year. The building that had obtained the green certificate has been increase to 388 building this year (GBI, 2017). In Malaysia, green building will be evaluated by using Green Building Index. It is a rating tool to measure the implementation of green concept in the building. These green buildings are evaluated by using GBI, but GBI did not assess how occupants feel while occupying green building. This paper presents the result of a study of Post-Occupancy Evaluation for Green Building from two case study (Kompleks Kerja Raya and Ministry of International Trade & Industry (MITI)). Aim and objective has been set in order to achieve the study. Aim for this study is to measure the occupant’s satisfaction level on green building of platinum and gold award by Green Building Index (GBI) after the buildings have been occupied. Building occupants are the most important feedback to measure their satisfaction level and to identify the relationship between Post-Occupancy Evaluation and Green Building Index. The result from the study shows the arrangement and design of workplace and thermal comfort obtained the lowest means. Occupants are satisfied with the criteria but still, the criteria obtained the lowest means compared to other criteria.

Barlex, M. J. (2006). Guide to Post Occupancy Evaluation. England: Higher Education Funding Council forEngland (HEFCE).
Environmentally Protection Agency (EPA). (2016, February 10). Retrieved Jun 1, 2017, from Green Building: https://archive.epa.gov/greenbuilding/web/html/about.html
Green Building Index. (2017, February 20). Retrieved September 29, 2016, from Criteria: http://www.gbi.com
Preiser, W.F. (2003), Continuous quality improvement through post-occupancy evaluation feedback, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 5(1), 42 – 56
Preiser, W. F. (2006). Post?occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better. Facilities, 13(11), 19-28.
Turpin-Brooks, S. & Viccars G., (2006),The development of robust methods of post occupancy evaluation, Facilities, 24(5/6), 177 – 196
Ellis, P. (1987). Post-occupancy evaluation. Facilities, 5(11), 12 - 14.
Gorgolewski, C. B. (2014). Assessing occupant satisfaction and energy behaviours in Toronto’s LEED gold high-rise residential buildings. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 8(4), 492 - 505.
Iftikhar, M. A. (2015). Framework model for post-occupancy evaluation of school facilities. Structural Survey, 33(4/5), 322 - 336.
Jamaludin, H. H. (2015). POE of Bioclimatic Design Building towards Promoting Sustainable Living. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 168, 280 – 288.
Kessler, H. (2010). Using Post-Occupancy Evaluations to Fine Tune Green Design. Facilities Management Green Feature.
Lau, Z. G.-Y. (2013). Post-occupancy evaluation of the thermal environment in a green building. Facilities , 31(7/8), 357 - 371.
Maclennan, P. (1991). Post-occupancy Evaluation. Facilities, 9(12), 14 - 15.
Rauch, K. M. (2008). Assessing Green Building Performance: A Post Occupancy Evaluation of 12 GSA Buildings. Richland, Washington: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Syal, S. M. (2016). Diffusion of green building guidelines. Construction Innovation, 16(1), 11 - 29.
Venkataraman, J. C. (2016). Analyzing relationships between project team compositions and green building certification in green building projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(5), 449 - 461.

In-Text Citation: (Hassin & Azlani, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Hassin, M. A., & Azlani, S. N. H. B. (2018). Post-Occupancy Evaluation for Green Building in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(8), 828–834.