ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
The study examined the effect of firm capital structure decisions on their performance based on a sample of non-financial firms. The results of the study show that capital structure decisions thus affect firms’ performance significantly. The study sampled 20 listed firms on the Ghana Stock Exchange over a 7 year period from 2010 to 2016. The study used both equity ratios and leverage ratios to measure capital structure. In all the regression results, the leverage variables were inversely related to performance. Short-term debt to equity which was expected to be positively related to performance is equally negatively related. The argument for short-term debt being positively related is due to the fact that such funds are generally cheap and easily accessible. However, the significance of such decisions on performance is mostly observed on equity holders. Thus, the return on equity as a measure of performance is significantly impacted by capital structure decisions. This is true regardless of the financial leverage variable observed, be it short-term debt, long-term debt or total debt. This, therefore, suggests that managements’ decision regarding how much debt to be employed in a business is constantly made with shareholders being the revolving factor.
1. Abdul,G .K. (2012). The Relationship of Capital Structure Decisions with Firm Performance: A Study of the Engineering Sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(1), 2162-3082.
2. Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), pp. 438–447.
3. Adekunle, P. (2009), Determinants of capital structure: empirical evidence from the Czech Republic, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 54, (7): 2-21.
4. Adesina, B., Nwidobie B., Oluwatosin O., (2015). Capital structure and financial performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 05(02) pp. 21-31.
5. Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research, Wadsworth, Thomson Learning Inc. Belmont, CA.
6. Baxter, L. A., & Babbie, E. (2004). The basics of communication research. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
7. Berger and Patti (2002). Capital structure and firm performance: new approach to test agency theory and the application to the banking industries. Feds paper.
8. Berger, A. N., & Patti, E. N. (2006). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to the Banking Industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1065-1102.
9. Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry. (1st edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Brigham, E. and Gapenski, L. (1996). Financial Management. Dallas: The Dryden Press.
12. Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory Econometrics for Finance (2nd Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bundala, (2014). Does Capital Structure Influence Working Capital Intensity and Growth Opportunity of a Firm: Evidence from Tanzania Firms. International Journal of Accounting and Financing Reporting, 4 (1) pp. 43-69. Califonia: Beverly Hills.
14. Clark, A.M. (1998). The qualitative–quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 27: 1242–1249.
15. Damodaran, D. (2001). Corporate Finance. Theory and Practice (2nd edition). New York: Wiely.
16. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
17. Durand, D. (1952). Costs of debt and equity funds for business: trends and problems of measurement. Conference on Research in Business Finance 1: 215-262.
18. Ebaid, E. I. (2009). The impact of capital-structure choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Risk Finance, 10(5), 477-487.
19. Fosu, S., (2013). Capital structure, product competition and firm performance. Evidence from South Africa, working paper no13/11 University of Leicesters.
20. Ghosh, C., Nag, R. & Sirmans, C. (2000). The pricing of seasoned equity offerings: evidence from REITs. Real Estate Economics, 28, 363-84.
21. Gleason, K., Mathur, L. & Mathur, I. (2000). The Interrelationship between Culture, Capital Structure and Performance: Evidence from European Retailers, Journal of business research, 50, 185-191.
22. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). London: Sage.
23. Hadlock, C. & James, C. (2002). Do banks provide financial slack? Journal of Finance, 57, 1383-420.
24. Hasan, B., Mainul Ahsan, A., Rahaman, A., & Alam, N. (2014). Influence of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 9 (5) pp 184 – 194.
25. Hassard, J. and Keleman, M. (2002) ‘Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the Paradigms Debate’, Organization 9: 331–55.
26. Javed, B. & Akhtar,S. (2012). Interrelationships between Capital Structure and Financial Performance, Firm Size and Growth: Comparison of industrial sector in KSE: European Journal of B
To cite this article: Akomeah, E., Bentil, P., Musah, A. (2018). The Impact of Capital Structure Decisions on Firm Performance: The Case of Listed Non-Financial Institutions in Ghana, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (4): 1-15.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode