ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Effective performance appraisal (EPA) is indispensable to organizations in establishing their accomplishments as well as improving employees’ performance. Previous literature has indicated the impacts of organizational fairness, organizational politics, transactional leadership and employee’s participation on performance appraisal (PA). The objective of this study is to confirm the validity and reliability of the research instruments in examining the relationships between organizational fairness, Politics, transactional leadership, and employees’ participation on EPA among academics in Nigeria. A survey method was employed, and a total of 40 questionnaires set was distributed to respondents via convenience sampling. Results confirmed the validity and reliability of the instruments adapted.
1. Abbas, M. Z. (2014). Effectiveness of performance appraisal on performance of employees. Journal of Business and Management, 2014(16), 6.
2. Ahmad, R., Lemba, C., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2010). Performance appraisal politics and employee turnover intention. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 8(2).
3. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2005). Managing performance: performance management in action. CIPD publishing.
4. Armstrong?Stassen, M., & Schlosser, F. (2010). When hospitals provide HR practices tailored to older nurses, will older nurses stay? It may depend on their supervisor. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(4), 375-390.
5. Atkins, P.W. & Wood, R.E. (2002), Self-versus others’ ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 871-904.
6. Babbie, E. (2008). The basics of social research fourth edition. International student edition. Thomson Wadsworth, USA.
7. Banks, C.G. & Murphy, K.R. (1985), Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal, Personnel Psychology, 38( 2), 335-345.
8. Bartram, T., Stanton, P., Casimir, G., Leggat, S. G., Bonias, D., & Cheng, C. (2009). Employee participation as a moderator on the high performance work systems and the perception of quality of care relationship in a large regional Australian health service.
9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.
10. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 207.
11. Bekele, A. Z., Shigutu, A. D., & Tensay, A. T. (2014). The effect of employees’ perception of performance appraisal on their work outcomes. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 2(1), 136-173.
12. Boice, D. F., & Kleiner, B. H. (1997). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. Work study, 46(6), 197-201.
13. Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468–478.
14. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of applied psychology, 83(4), 615.
15. Cheng, S. Y. (2014). The mediating role of organizational justice on the relationship between administrative performance appraisal practices and organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1131-1148.
16. Christopher, K., Gregory, N., Alice, C., & Elizabeth, N. M. (2017). Determinants of Effectiveness of Employee Performance Appraisal System in Institution of Higher Learning: A Survey of Public Universities in Nakuru County.
17. Collins, B. J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2017). Fairness means more to some than others: Interactional fairness, job embeddedness, and discretionary work behaviors. Journal of Management, 43(2), 293-318.
18. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer?. Journal of applied psychology, 97(1), 1.
19. Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A. III. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in micro organizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 67-76
20. Dawson, C. (2007). Practical research methods: A user-friendly guide to mastering research techniques and projects (3rd ed., pp. 1–193). Oxford: How to Books Ltd.
21. Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1–542). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22. Egginton, B. E. (2010), Introduction of formal performance appraisal of academic staff: the management challenges associated wit
To cite this article: Babagana, S.A., Mat, N. B., Ibrahim, H. B. (2019). Determinants of Effectiveness of Performance Appraisal (EPA) for Academics in Nigerian Higher Education Institutions(HEIs): A Pilot Study, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 9 (1): 11-20.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode