Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

The Comparative Effect of Concept Mapping and Marginal Glossing on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Retention

Elham Dehdari

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i9/6360

Open access

This Study was an attempt to investigate the comparative effect of marginal glossing and concept mapping on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. To fulfill the purpose of this study, 60 female students of Iranmehr Language School in Tehran were selected from among a total number of 110 based on their performance on the reading section of a mock IELTS General Module and a vocabulary test and were randomly assigned to two experimental groups. The mean scores of both groups on the reading comprehension posttests were compared though an independent samples t-test which led to the rejection of the null hypothesis thus concluding that there was a significant difference between the effect of concept mapping and marginal glossing on EFL learners’ reading comprehension with the concept map group outperforming the marginal gloss group. For comparing the two groups’ vocabulary retention, the results of the two groups on the vocabulary posttest and the vocabulary delayed posttest were compared through a Repeated Measures ANOVA. The results of the study indicate some pedagogical implications for EFL teachers and learners.

Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3 14) London: British Association for Applied Linguistics, in association with Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
Aidman, E. V., & Egan, G. (1998). Academic assessment through computerized concept mapping: Validating a method of implicit map reconstruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25 (3), 277-294.
Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language (pp. 1-27). New York: Longman.
Angelo, T. A., and Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. In Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96 (1), 124-129.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. In American Psychologist, 30 (8), 821 828.
Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. In Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 126-133.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology, A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Barnett, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bascones, J., & J. D. Novak. (1985). Alternative instructional systems and the development of problem solving skills in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 7 (3), 253-261.
Bell, F., & LeBlanc, L. (2000). The language of glosses in L2 reading on computer: Learners’ preferences. Hispania, 83 (2), 274-285.
Bernhardt, E. B. (2000). Second-language reading as a case study of reading scholarship in the 20th century. In Michael L. Kamil, Peter B. Mosenthal, P. David Pearson, and Rebecca Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. (pp. 793-811).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolodating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 15-34.
Bleasdale, F. (1983). Paivio’s dual-coding model of meaning revisited. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, Memory and Cognition: Essays in Honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 183-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Buzan, T. (1989). Use Your Head. London: BBC Books.Candlin, C.N. (1988). The Communicative Teaching of English. Principles and an Exercise Typology. London: Longman.
Carnot, M. J., Dunn, B. and Canas, A. J. 2003. Concept maps vs. web pages for information searching and browsing. Retrieved February 22nd from: http:www.coginst.uwf.edu/~acanas/Publications/CMapsVSWebPagesExp1/CMapsVSWebPagesExp1.htm
Chang, K., Sung, Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183-198.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. The Modern Language Journal, 85(3), 165-182.
Coady & T. Huckin (1999). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning. Jerusalem: A research report under the auspices of Brandeis University and submitted to the Jacob Hiatt Institute.
Cohen, A. D. (1987). The use of verbal and imagery mnemonics in second-language vocabulary learning. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 43-62.
Crandell, T. L., Naomi, A., & Soderston, C. (1996). Empirical evaluation of concept mapping: A job performance aid for writers. Technical Communication, 43, 157-158.
Davis, R. L. (2008). MOSAIC: Content-based Instruction in

In-Text Citation: (Dehdari, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Dehdari, E. (2019). The Comparative Effect of Concept Mapping and Marginal Glossing on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Retention. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), 697–709.