ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
This research identifies the barriers encountered by automotive component manufacturers in adopting supply chain risk management (SCRM). A qualitative case study method was employed at three purposely selected case companies by interviewing 10 senior managers. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Results show that the automotive component manufacturers are prominently challenged by the level of understanding of SCRM which led to negative perceptions toward SCRM adoption. In conclusion, this study prepares automotive company managers with a foresight of SCRM adoption challenges so that sufficient planning could be developed for successful SCRM adoption.
1. Chileshe, N., & Kikwasi, G. J. (2013). Perception of barriers to implementing risk assessment and management practices by construction professionals in Tanzania. Management, 1137, 1146.
2. Collier, P., Collier, P. M., & Agyei-Ampomah, S. (2005). Management accounting-Risk and control strategy: Elsevier.
3. Darwish, S., & Abdeldayem, M. M. (2019). Risk Management and Business Ethics: Relations and Impacts in the GCC. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(10), 489-504.
4. Ericson, R. (2006). Ten uncertainties of risk-management approaches to security. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 48(3), 345-356.
5. Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D. A., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2011). ISO/TS 16949: analysis of the diffusion and current trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(5), 735-745.
6. Kallenberg, K. (2009). Operational risk management in Swedish industry: Emergence of a new risk paradigm? Risk Management, 11(2), 90-110.
7. Kleffner, A. E., Lee, R. B., & McGannon, B. (2003). The effect of corporate governance on the use of enterprise risk management: Evidence from Canada. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 6(1), 53-73.
8. Kumar, S., Satyendra, & Bhat, A. (2014). Supply chain risk management dimensions in Indian automobile industry: A cluster analysis approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(6), 1023-1040.
9. Moshesh, R., Niemann, W., & Kotzé, T. (2018). Enterprise risk management implementation challenges: A case study in a petrochemical supply chain. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29, 230-244.
10. Ochieng, B. (2019). Effect of Supply Chain Risk Management Practices on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. Journal of International Business, Innovation and Strategic Management, 2(1), 14 - 30.
11. Renault, Berenger Y, Agumba, Justus N, & Balogun, OA. (2016). Drivers for and obstacles to enterprise risk management in construction firms: a literature review. Procedia engineering, 164, 402-408.
12. Revilla, E., & Saenz, M. J. (2017). The impact of risk management on the frequency of supply chain disruptions: A configurational approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(5), 557-576.
13. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.
14. Rostami, A., Sommerville, J., Wong, I. L., & Lee, C. (2015). Risk management implementation in small and medium enterprises in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(1), 91-107.
15. Singh, N. (2014). Automotive industry response to its global QMS standard ISO/TS-16949 Globalization and Standards (pp. 121-142): Springer.
16. Yusuwan, N. M., Adnan, H., Omar, A. F., & Kamaruzaman, J. (2008). Clients' perspectives of risk management practice in Malaysian construction industry. J. Pol. & L., 1, 121.
17. Zhao, X. (2015). Enterprise risk management in international construction firms: drivers and hindrances. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(3), 347-366. doi: 10.1108/ecam-09-2014-0117
To cite this article: Hudin, N.S., Hamid, A.B.A., Habidin, N.F., Mustaffa, W.S.W. (2019). Barrier Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management Adoption in Automotive Companies, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 9 (3): 295-299
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode