ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Waqf continues to be a significant source for developing the Muslim community today. Waqf institutions thus need to ensure their unceasing effectiveness in managing Waqf funds so as to establish a Muslim economy that is more vibrant, progressive and inclusive. The improved performance of the institution, which can be achieved by improving public trust, will in turn lead to social improvements as well. To ensure that a Waqf institution remains competitive, it is crucial to identify its core competencies in terms of leadership styles and roles which allow it to establish a productive working environment. Therefore, the institution’s leader plays a major role in ensuring management effectiveness. This paper reviews several literatures on the management effectiveness of Waqf institutions and proposes viable leadership communication styles for the institutions. It has been suggested that clear, regular and constant communication is necessary for the growth and effectiveness of any institution.
Abas, F. N., & Raji, F. (2018). Factors Contributing to Inefficient Management and Maintenance of Waqf Properties: A Literature Review, 03, 53–67.
Adila, F. (2019). Local waqf sets to move into digitalisation. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/business/2019/07/503817/local-waqf-sets-move-digitalisation
Afifuddin, H. B., & Siti-Nabiha, A. (2010). Towards Good Accountability?: The Role of Accounting in Islamic Religious Organisations, 4(6), 1141–1147.
Ahmad, S., & Muhamed, N. D. (2011). Institusi Wakaf dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Negara?: Kes Pembangunan Tanah Wakaf di Malaysia. Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke VI (PERKEM VI), 1, 138–147.
Arshad, R., & Zain, N. M. (2017). Performance Measurement And Accountability Of Waqf Institutions In Malaysia.
Arshad, R., Zain, N. M., Urus, S. T., & Chakir, A. (2018). Modelling Maqasid Waqf Performance Measures in Waqf Institutions, (January), 157–170.
Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2013). Social impact measurement and non-profit organisations: compliance, resistance, and promotion.
Atan, R., Aliman, S., Zainon, S., & Theng, R. Y. N. (2013). Financial Management in Religious Non-Profit Organizations?: A Mission Based Approach to Ratio Analysis, (October 2014). http://doi.org/10.2991/icacsei.2013.122
Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises. http://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009351111
Barman, E. (2007). What is the Bottom Line for Nonprofit Organizations?? A History of Measurement in the British Voluntary Sector What is the Bottom Line for Nonprofit Organizations?? A History of Measurement in the British Voluntary Sector, (October). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-007-9039-3
Bartusevicien?, I., & Sakalyte, E. (2013). ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT?: EFFECTIVENESS VS . EFFICIENCY, 2013(1), 45–53.
Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting employee performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 106–115. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.174
Bhattacharya, R., & Tinkelman, D. (2009). How Tough are Better Business Bureau/Wise Giving Alliance Financial Standards?, (516), 467–489.
Bothwel, R. O. (2000). Trends In Self-Regulation And Transparency Of Nonprofits In The U.S. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol2iss3/sg_2.htm
Boyle, I. O., & Hassan, D. (2016). Performance management and measurement in national-level non-profit sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(3), 299–314. http://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2014.898677
Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the Association Between Board and Organizational Performance in Nonprofit Organizations, 15(3).
Castro, E., Ezra Vázquez-D’Amico, & Pessanha, R. (2018). DONOR TRUST REPORT?: An In-depth Look into the State of Public Trust in the Charitable Sector.
Catrin, J., Vernon, D. M., & Solange, H. (2014). Communication competence improves organizational effectiveness. Strategic Direction, 30(8), 28–31. http://doi.org/10.1108/SD-08-2014-0097
Chartered Management Institute. (2010). The importance of effective management, 21–24. Retrieved from www.thetimes100.co.uk
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees, 8(14), 80–88. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p80
Cordery, C., & Sinclair, R. (2013). Measuring performance in the third sector, (2010). http://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0014
Cutt, J., & Murray, V. (2000). Accountability and Effectiveness Evaluation in Nonprofit Organizations (Routledge Studies in the Management of Voluntary and Non-Profit Organizations) (1st Editio). Routledge; 1 edition (August 24, 2000).
Daud, D. (2017). The role of Islamic governance in the Reinforcement Waqf Reporting: SIRC Malaysia case.
Daud, D. (2018). Insight into the reasons for the lack of Waqf reporting, 6(3), 48–58.
Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2010). The Limits of Nonprofit Impact?: A Contingency Framework fo
In-Text Citation: (Sharip, Awang, & Ismail, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Sharip, S. M., Awang, M., Ismail, R. (2019). Management Effectiveness in Waqf Institutions in Malaysia: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 254–271.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode