Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

A Study of Stress Factor towards Oil Palm Workers’ Productivity at Felda Techno-plant Gugusan Waha, Kota Tinggi

Muhd Faiz Bin Mohamad, Nurulain Binti Isa, Nur Nabila Huda Binti Aziz

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6637

Open access

The study was conducted to recognize the relationship of stress with oil palm workers’ productivity, which are consist the factor of wages, workload, management style and social influence pressure. Major aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the factors of stress and productivity of oil palm workers, to evaluate the dominant factor of stress that influences the productivity of oil palm workers and to make appropriate recommendations to manage stress problem based on the finding of the study. The study was focused on oil palm harvester that working in Felda Techno-plant In Johor district and 80 respondents were identified to be asked by using a questionnaire and interview section. Data was analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Nevertheless, result show one of the three factors of stress are not correlate which is workloads, where it does not have any relationship with oil palm workers’ productivity. The result for most dominant factor is wages of oil palm workers and followed by social influence pressure and management style. Total correlated factors that influence oil palm workers’ productivity was 0.195. It can explain that, independent variable affecting 19.5 % of oil palm workers’ productivity.

Ali, M. M., & Warfa, A. O. (2018). Pupils, Parents and Teachers Perceptions on Causes of Low Achievements in Kenya Certificate of Primary Education Examination: A Case Study in a Public School in Mandera County, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(2).
Clayton, B. M., Staden, V. C. J., & Lynch, B. (2010). The impact of social influance pressure on professional accountants' ethical reasoning. Paper Presented at the 6th Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (APIRA 2010). Sydney, Australia.
Ejike, S. I. (2018). An Assessment of Non-Executive Directors Influence on the Operating Profits of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (2): 1-8.
Fairbrother, K., Warn, J. (2003) Workplace dimensions, stress and job satisfaction", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 18 Issue: 1, pp.8-21,
Ferreira, A., & Plessis, D. T. (2009). Effect of online social networking on employee productivity. South African Journal of Information Management, 11(1), 1-11.
Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. T. (2011). Organizational behavior and management (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kabir, M. M. (2011). Factors Affecting Employee Job Satisfaction of Pharmaceutical Sector. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol.1 No.9 113-123.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30, 607-610.
Manzoor, A., Awan, H., & Mariam, S. (2012). Investigating the impact of work stress on job performance: A study on textile sector of faisalabad. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2 (1), 20-28.
Serrano, D., & Vieira, C. (2005). Low Pay, Higher Pay and Job Satisfaction within the European Union: Empirical Evidence from Fourteen Countries. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1558.
Yates, J. E. (1979). Managing stress. New York: Amacom.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2009). Business research methods (8th ed.). USA: South-Western College Publishing.

In-Text Citation: (Mohamad, Isa & Aziz, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Mohamad, M. F. B., Isa, N. B., & Aziz, N. N. H. B. (2019). A study of Stress Factor towards Oil Palm Workers’ Productivity at Felda Techno-plant Gugusan Waha, Kota Tinggi. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 1086–1093.