ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The big scale project always involves a large number of parties and stakeholder which might trigger a lot of issues. The study identified a level of public participation in Arnstein’s ladder of participation and also identified several of issues of public participation. However, this paper focuses on the Non-participation of environmental impact assessment (EIA) process through eight rung of Arnstein’s ladder of participation. The main objective of this study to identify the influencer of low level of public participation in Malaysia. The single case study has been used in this paper. This paper is also based on secondary data collection and primary data collection from qualitative method. The result of the study lead on the drivers of non-participation in EIA’s public engagement for Malaysia’s MRT project.
1- Rega, C. and Baldizzone, G. (2014) “Public Participation in Strategic Assessment: A Practitioners perspective.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50 (2015):105–115
2- Bastidas, S. (2004) “The Role of Public Participation In The impact Assessment of Trade Process” Speaker paper for the Impact Assessment for Industrial Development – IAIA’04 (April 28th 2004, Vancouver)
3- Marzuki, A. (2009) “A Review on Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in Malaysia.” Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management No. 3 (12)
4- Wasserman, C. (2012) “Application of Public Participation Principles in EIA,” Strengthening Public Participation in Environmental Management in Indonesia Training Workshop, Jakarta, Indonesia.
5- Albayrak, A. (2016) “Public behaviour for public participation in EIA process, Turkey.” IAIA16 Conference Proceedings Resilience and Sustainability 36th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment (11 - 14 May 2016)
6- Arnstein, S. R. (1969) “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35: 4, 216 — 224.
7- Collins, Kevin and Ison, R. (2006) “Dare we jump o? Arnstein’s ladder?” Social learning as a new policy paradigm. In: Proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, 4-7 June 2006, Edinburgh.
8- Yaakob, H. (2012) “Penyertaan Awam: Kejayaan dan Kegagalan Dalam Perancangan Pembangunan.” Journal Pengurusan Awam 67-84.
9- Alam, S. (2014) “Public Participation in the Enforcement of Environmental Laws: Issues and Challenges in the Light of the Legal and Regulatory Framework with Special Reference to EIAs in Malaysia” Bangladesh Research Foundation Journal Vol. 3, No. 1.
10- Cheryl, S. F., Chi, J. X., & Xue, L. (2014) “Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57:9.
11- Omar, D., Leh, O. L. H. (2009) “Malaysia Development Planning System: Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan and Public participation”, Asian Social Science Vol.5,No.3 pp.30-35.
12- Consulting ERE, (2011) “Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit: Sungai Buloh- Kajang Line: Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment,’ Malaysia.
13- White, S. (1996) “Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation”. Development in Practice. Vol. 6.
In-Text Citation: (Zain, Omar, Saidin, & Lop, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Zain, F. M. Y., Omar, D., Saidin, M. T., & Lop, N. S. (2019). Drivers of Non-Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) with Evidence to Malaysia’s MRT Project. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 1221–1227.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode