ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Innovations is one of STEM products that will significantly impact people’s life. However, the ability of STEM-driven innovation to solve a particular problem may be different from one place to another. It depends on the values preserved by a particular society. This study investigate how value orientation may be the resistance to utility of reverse vending machine (RVM). The current study adopted qualitative research approach. Qualitative data were collected from Malaysian public through comments they left on an article posted on a Facebook group page about RVM. The 281 comments were analyzed thematically. Three themes presented in this article are: i) egoistic oriented response; ii) biospheric oriented response; and iii) anticipation of the adverse effects of reverse vending machine. This study suggests there is a need for education reorientation, especially STEM education in Malaysia. STEM education should develop thinking citizens that are able to think and make their own decisions based on sound judgment in determining what counts as proper behavior.
Abdullah, A. (2015). Can religion have a place in modern science? International Conference on Aqidah, Dakwah and Syariah, 1-15.
Arthur, J., Waring, M., Coe, R., & Hedges, L. V. (2012). Research Methods & Methodologies in Education. London: Sage Publications.
Ashley, M. (2005).Tensions between indoctrination and the development of judgement: the case against early closure. Environmental Education Research, 11(2), 187-197.
Bianchi, N., & Giorcelli M. (2017). STEM Degrees Are Good for Careers. But Do They Lead to More Innovation? Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/do-stem-degrees-increase-innovation
Breiner, J. M., Johnson, C. C., Harkness, S. S. & Koelher, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
Casey, P. J., & Scott, K. (2006). Environmental concern and behaviour in an Australian sample within an ecocentric–anthropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 57-67.
Courtenay-Hall, P., & Rogers, L. (2002). Gaps in mind: Problems in environmental knowledge-behaviour modelling research. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 283-297.
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of advanced nursing, 26(3), 623-630.
Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (2010). Deep ecology. Technology and Values: Essential Readings, 454-59.
Dobson, A. (2007) Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 276-285.
Etikan, I., Musa S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Farrokhi, F., & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 784.
Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.
Francis, Ong’ayo, O. D., & Adams, Y. (2018). An Analysis of Relationship between Relevance at the Lexical and the Phrasal levels of Financial Budget Discourse Texts. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(1), 111–120.
Fritsche, I., & Hafner, K. (2012). The malicious effects of existential threat on motivation to protect the natural environment and the role of environmental identity as a moderator. Environment and Behavior, 44(4), 570-590.
Gaur, A., Mathuria, D., & Priyadarshini, R. (2018). A Simple Approach to Design Reverse Vending Machine. International Journal of Electronics, Electrical and Computational System, 7(3), 110-119.
Groot, D. J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354.
Halim, L. (2013). Syarahan Perdana: Pendidikan Sains dan Pembangunan Masyarakat Beliterasi Sains, Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Garling, T. (2008). The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 1-9.
Hazri, J., Razak, N. A., Ahmad, M. Z., & Issa, J. (2010). A Study of the policies and practices of teacher education in Malaysia towards producing quality pre-service teachers. Second East Asian International Conference on Teacher Education Research, Hong Kong.
Howell, R. A. (2012). Promoting lower-carbon lifestyles: the role of personal values, climate change communications and carbon allowances in processes of change. The University of Edinburgh. Doctorate Thesis.
Huckle, J. (2014). Education for Sustainable Citizenship: an emerging focus for education for sustainability. Education for sustainability, 228-243.
Jic
In-Text Citation: (Abdullah et al, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Abdullah, S. I. S. S., Zainuddin, Z. N., Shahali, E. H. M., Rahman, N. A., & Rahim, F. A. (2019). Value Orientation as Resistance to Utility of STEM-Driven Innovations to Promote Environmental Conservation among Public. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 1495–1505.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode