ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of Value at Risk using Historical Simulation method for Kijang Emas investment, the official gold bullion coin of Malaysia. Previously, a common investor using variance or standard deviation which simply measures variation in risk. However, majority of the investors fail to relate it with the return of investment because downside risk is not being quantified in monetary terms. Thus, the Value at Risk (VaR) concept has been introduced to estimates the loss likely to be suffered by the investor with the certain level of probability express in any chosen currency such as Malaysia Ringgit, dollar, baht, etc. Result show that VaR concept is successfully been implemented and Historical Simulation method proven to accurately estimate the maximum potential loss under normal market condition. Therefore, domestic investors are recommended to use VaR for decision making purposes about investment in Kijang Emas.
Abad, P., Benito, S., & Lopez, C. (2014). A Comprehensive Review of Value at Risk Methodologies. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 12, 15–32.
Alzgool, M. (2019). Nexus between Green HRM and Green Management towards Fostering Green Values. Management Science Letters, 9(12), 2073-2082.
Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is Gold a Hedge or a Safe Haven? An Analysis of Stocks, Bonds and Gold. The Financial Review, 45, 217-229.
Baur, D. G., & McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is Gold a Safe Haven? International Evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1886-1898.
Bayram, K., Abdullah, A., & Meera, A. K. M. (2017). Financial Market Risk and Gold Investment in an Emerging Market: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Islamic Finance (Special Issue), 091-099.
Beckmann, J., Berger, T., & Czudaj, R. (2015). Does Gold Act as a Hedge or a Safe Haven for Stocks? A Smooth Transition Approach. Economic Modelling, 48, 16-24.
Grootveld, H., & Hallerbach, W. (1999). Variance vs downside risk: Is there really that much difference?. European Journal of Operational Research, 114(2), 304-319.
Gruber, M. J., Elton, E. J., Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (1991). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Harlow, W. V. (1991). Asset allocation in a downside-risk framework. Financial Analysts Journal, 28-40
Ibrahim, M. H. (2012). Financial Market Risk and Gold Investment in an Emerging Market: The Case of Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(1): 25-34.
Jamaan, S. H., Weng, H. L., & Isa, Z. (2011). Different Downside Risk Approaches in Portfolio Optimisation. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis 7(1), 77–84.
Jorion, P. (2001). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. Business and Economics, 1-24.
Khalid, N., Islam, D. M. Z., & Ahmed, M. R. M. (2019). Sentrepreneurial Training and Organizational Performance: Implications for Future. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 590-593.
Kiohos, A., & Dimopoulos, A. (2007). Estimation Portfolio VaR with Three Different Methods: Financial Institution Risk Management Approach. Journal of Economics and Business, 54(2), 59-83.
Linsmeier, T. J., & Pearson, N. D. (2000). Value at Risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(2), 47-67.
Muhammad, K., Saoula, O., Issa, M., & Ahmed, U. (2019). Contract Management and Performance Characteristics: An Empirical and Managerial Implication for Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 9(8), 1289-1298.
Nawrocki D. N. (1999). A Brief History of Downside Risk Measures. Journal of Investing, 8, 9-25.
News Strait Times, 2001. Standardize Practices in Islamic Banking, June 26.
Sing, T. F., & Ong, S. E. (2000). Asset Allocation in a Downside Risk Framework. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 6(3), 213-223.
In-Text Citation: (Amin et al., 2019)
To Cite this Article: Amin, F. A. M., Othman, N. I., Khairuddin, M. K. A., & Hazahar, M. H. M. (2019). Measuring Value at Risk for Kijang Emas Investment using Historical Simulation Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), 1363–1370.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode