Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2225-8329

Home Ownership Motivation in Malaysia: A Youth Perspective

Shathees Baskaran, Saravin Kumar Binu Kumar, Shatish Rao Samtharam, Thanabalan Tangaraja, Nomahaza Mahadi

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v10-i2/7309

Open access

The government of Malaysia has implemented many housing policies and programs to increase the rate of home ownership among youths. However, this rate remains low as the motivation in having a home has decreased over the years, whilst renting became the youths’ alternative. Besides, a high frequency of job changing has influenced them in purchasing a house. Hence, to verify the gap, this research has performed to understand the relationship between perceived job alternatives and home ownership motivation among Malaysian youths. Local amenities investment, social capital investment, financial benefits, and residential stability are dimensions of home ownership used to study its relationship with perceived job alternatives. Whereas, job insecurity used as a mediating factor between perceived job alternatives and home ownership motivation. The research data collected through an online survey and 379 usable respondents were obtained. Results showed perceived job alternative does have a significant relationship with home ownership and its dimensions. There is also a partial mediating effect of perceived job insecurity on the relationship between perceived job alternatives and home ownership motivation. These findings will be useful for the government to understand the Malaysian youth’s motivation in purchasing a house with a job being an influence.

1. Aaronson, D. (2000). A Note on the Benefits of Homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 47(3), pp. 356-369.
2. Abdullah, L., Nor, S. I. B. M., Jumadi, S. N., & Arshad, S. H. (2012). First-time home buyers: Factors influencing decision making. In International Conference on Innovation and Technology for Sustainable Built Environment, (pp. 249-254).
3. Aramburu, M. (2015). Rental as A Taste of Freedom: The Decline of Home Ownership amongst Working?class Youth in Spain during Times of Crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 39(6), pp. 1172-1190
4. Arshad, M., Farooq, O., & Farooq, M. (2019). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on entrepreneurial intentions: The moderating role of collectivist orientation. Management Decision, 57(3), 649-668.
5. Aziz, W. N. A. W. A., Hanif, N. R., & Singaravello, K. (2011). Affordable housing within the middle income households in Malaysia: Challenge to enter homeownership. Australian. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol 5(8), pp. 258-267.
6. Badcock, B., & Beer, A. (2000). Home Truths: Property ownership and housing wealth in Australia. Melbourne University Press.
7. Baqutaya, S., Ariffin, A. S., & Raji, F. (2016). Affordable housing policy: Issues and challenges among middle-income groups. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 6(6), pp. 433-436.
8. Barcus, H. (2004). Urban-rural migration in the USA: An analysis of residential satisfaction. Regional Studies, Vol. 38(6), pp. 643-657.
9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction insocial psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 1173-1182.
10. Belsky, E. S., & Duda, M. (2002). Asset appreciation, timing of purchases and sales, and returns to low-income home ownership. Low-income home ownership: Examining the unexamined goal, Vol. 10(2), pp. 208-238.
11. Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., Lindström, M., & Nystedt, P. (2003). Investments in social capital—implications of social interactions for the production of health. Social science & medicine, Vol. 56(12), pp. 2379-2390.
12. Borg, I., & Elizur, D. (1992). Job insecurity: Correlates, moderators and measurement. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 13(2), pp. 13-26.
13. Campbell, D., & Sengenberger, W. (1994). Labour standards, economic efficiency and development: lessons from experience with industrial restructuring. International Institute for Labor Studies, Vol. 49(2), 421-39.
14. Chang, S., & Lee, Z. H. (2013). A study on the influencing effects of university students’ e-business start-up intention. The e-Business Studies, 14(3), 37-53.
15. Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?. Journal of business venturing, 13(4), 295-316.
16. Clark, W., Deurloo, M., & Dieleman, F. (2006). Residential mobility and neighborhood outcomes. Housing Studies, Vol. 21(3), pp. 323 – 342.
17. Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. F. (1972). Personal responsibility-for-consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8(6), 558-593.
18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
19. De Beer, S. M. (2011). The psychological contract, job insecurity and the intention to quit of security employees in the Vaal Triangle (Doctoral dissertation, North West University).
20. Der Hovanesian, M. (1999). Spending It, Investing It--Coming on Strong: The Children of the Baby Boomers Are Affecting Spending and Investing as Their Parents Did; The Similarity Ends There. Wall street journal, Eastern edition, 12.
21. DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. L. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are home owners better citizens? Journal of urban Economics, Vol. 45(2), pp. 354-384.
22. Dornyei, Z. (2013). Research

To cite this article: Baskaran, S., Bin Kumar, S. K., Samtharam, S. R., Tangaraja, T., Mahadi, N. (2020). Home Ownership Motivation in Malaysia: A Youth Perspective, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 10 (2):49-64.