Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC): Contemporary Improved Measurement Model for Intangible Assets.

Siti Zaitun Saddam; Mohamad Nizam Jaafar

The purpose of this study is to explain the new measurement model for intangible asset named Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC).This measurement model measured intangible asset in a robust way. MVAIC is a broadly measure of Intellectual capital based on previous VAIC model. However, MVAIC included relational capital efficiency (RCE). The value of relational capital is obtained from the amount of expenses incurred for marketing. The advantage of MVAIC is that it can measure intellectual capitals related to the company's relationship with external parties from a broader perspective. In the context of this relationship, it can be measured by means of monetization, that is, introducing the company to the public through marketing and providing economic benefits that can be provided in the form of services or commodities. This study systematically includes all the past literatures on the measurement model for intangibles. The researcher suggested to use MVAIC measurement model for future studies as it provides better results.

Agostini, L., & Nosella, A. (2017). Enhancing radical innovation performance through intellectual capital components. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(4), 789-806.
Al-Musali, & ku Ismail. (2014). Intellectual Capital and its Effect on Financial Performance of Banks: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 201-207.
Asongu, S. A., & Andres, A. R. (2019). Trajectories of knowledge economy in SSA and MENA countries. Technology in Society.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bayraktaroglu, A., Calisir, F., & Baskak, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20.
Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41-60.
Boujelbene, M. A., & Affes, H. (2013). The impact of intellectual capital disclosure on cost of equity capital: A case of French firms. Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 18(34), 45-53.
Chen, J., Zhu, Z., & Yuan Xie, H. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195-212.
Chu, S. K. W., Chan, K. H., & Wu, W. Y. (2011). Charting intellectual capital performance of the gateway to China. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 249-276.
Curado, C., Guedes, M., & Bontis, N. (2014). The Financial Crisis of Banks (Before, During and After): An Intellectual Capital Perspective. Knowledge and Process Management, 21.
Dzenopoljac, V., Janosevic, S., & Bontis, N. (2016). Intellectual capital and financial performance in the Serbian ICT industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 373-396. doi:10.1108/jic-07-2015-0068
Edvinsson, L., & Malone , M. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower: HarperCollins.
Fatihudin, D., & Mochklas, M. (2018). How Measuring Financial Performance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9.
Gogan, M.-L. (2014). An Innovative Model for Measuring Intellectual Capital. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 194-199.
Goh, P. K. (2005). Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3).
Gosselin, M., & Radnor, Z. (2005). An empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(5/6), 419-437.
Huseman, R., & Goodman, J. (1999). Leading with Knowledge: The Nature of Competition in the 21st Century. Sage, London.
Jancenelle, V. E. (2015). The relationship between firm resources and joint ventures: revisited. American Journal of Business, 30(1), 8-21.
joshi, M., Cahill, D., & Sidhu, J. (2010). Intellectual capital performance in the banking sector. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 14(2).
Joshi, M., Cahill, D., Sidhu, J., & Kansal, M. (2013). Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 264-285.
Kamath, G. B. (2007). The intellectual capital performance of Indian banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 96-123.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, 74, 75-85.
Maji, S. G., & Goswani, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and firm performance in India: a comparative study between original and modified value added intellectual coefficient model. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 14(1).
Manzari, M., Kazemi, M., Nazemi, S., & Pooya, A. (2012). Intellectual capital: Concepts, components and indicators: A literature review. Management Science Letters, 2(7), 2255-2270.
Martin-de Castro, G., Diez-Vial, I., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and the firm: evolution and research trends. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(4), 555-580.
Martín-de Castro, G., Díez-Vial, I., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and the firm: evolution and research trends. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(4), 555-580.
Mendes, D., Mario, J., & Romao, M. (2016). Creating Value from Intangible Assets: An Employee Portal Case Study.
Naz, F., & Ijaz, F. (2016). Financial Performance of Firms: Evidence from Pakistan Cement Industry. Journal of Teaching and Education.
Nimtrakoon, S. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital, firms’ market value and financial performance Empirical evidence from the ASEAN. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 587-618.
Nuryaman, N. (2015). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on The Firm's Value with The Financial Performance as Intervening Variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 292-298.
Ozkan, N., Cakan, S., & Kayacan, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 190-198.
Pantea, M., Gligor, D., & Anis, C. (2014). Economic Determinants of Romanian Firms’ Financial Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 272-281.
Saddam, S. Z. (2021). Intellectual Capital: The Current Affluence of Organizations in Malaysian Banking Industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(1).
Singh, S., Sidhu, J., Joshi, M., & Kansal, M. (2016). Measuring intellectual capital performance of Indian banks. Managerial Finance, 42(7), 635-655. doi:10.1108/mf-08-2014-0211
Sulanjaku, M. (2014). The Contribution of Skandia Navigator in Intangibles Measurements. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Sumedrea, S. (2013). Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance: A Dynamic Relationship in Crisis Time. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 137-144. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(13)00125-1
Sveiby, K.-E. (1997). The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 2, 73-97.
Sydler, R., Haefliger, S., & Pruksa, R. (2014). Measuring intellectual capital with financial figures: Can we predict firm profitability? European Management Journal, 32(2), 244-259.
Ting, & Lean. (2009). Intellectual capital performance of financial institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(4).
Tiwari, R., & Vidyarthi, H. (2018). Intellectual capital and corporate performance: a case of Indian banks. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 84-105.
Ulum, I. (2015). Intellectual Capital: Model Pengukuran, Framework Pengungkapan, dan Kinerja Organisasi, . UMM Press, Malang.
Ulum, I., Ghozali, I., & Chariri, A. (2008). Intellectual capital dan kinerja keuangan perusahaan; sebuah analisis dengan pendekatan partial least squares. Paper presented at the Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI, Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia Kompartemen Akuntan Pendidik, Universitas Tanjung Pura, Pontianak. .
Ulum, I., Kharismawati, N., & Syam, D. (2017). Modified value-added intellectual coefficient (MVAIC) and traditional financial performance of Indonesian biggest companies. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 14(3), 207.
Ulum, I., Rizkiyah, & Jati, A. W. (2016). Intellectual Capital Performance: A Comparative Study between Financial and Non-Financial Industry of Indonesian Biggest Companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1436-1439.
Vaz, C., Zarelli, P., Werutsky, V., Selig, P., & Morales, A. (2015). Measurement Models of Intellectual Capital for the Decision Making and Performance Variables. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, XV, 23-30.
Zulkifli, N., Abdul-Shukor, Z., & Ridhuan, M. (2017). Intellectual Capital Efficiency and Firm Performance in Malaysia: The Effect of Government Ownership. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 8, 93-105.

In-Text Citation: (Saddam & Jaafar, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Saddam, S. Z., & Jaafar, M. N. (2021). Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC): Contemporary Improved Measurement Model for Intangible Assets. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 11(1), 201-210.

Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC): Contemporary Improved Measurement Model for Intangible Assets.

Siti Zaitun Saddam, Mohamad Nizam Jaafar

Further Information

Our Journals

Get intouch with us