ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
As the winds of change sweep across the globe, the developing countries are experiencing turbulence in their education systems necessitating major changes in curriculum. However, these changes will not be successfully implemented without a proper understanding of the concept of curriculum, status and implications of theories of curriculum change, and the main problems of curriculum change in developing economies. The authors adopted desktop research to conceptualize the fore listed areas of concern. The literature which spanned from 1940s to date revealed that in the face of change the concept of curriculum is acquiring new meanings; curriculum change takes various meanings- innovation (for new curricular), development or reforms (for general changes); there is a sharp division between theoretical and empirical knowledge on curriculum change; While Complexity Theory and Lewin’s Theory of Planned Change and are used in curriculum change, there are criticisms that where as the Theory of Planned Change is too rigid and unidirectional, Complexity Theory is too fluid and unpredictable; The debate on whether Complexity Theory is new wine in Lewin’s old wineskin is inconclusive; Complexity Theory seem to be suitable in understanding the multifaceted problems of change in developing economies which include insufficient diffusion and dissemination of information, lack of material and human resource, management issues, and the syndrome of copying and pasting innovations from developed countries.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies 41(6) 977-1002.
Norris, C., & Charles, M. (1991). “Themes for change”:A look at systemic restructuring experiences”. Educational Horizons, 69(2)90-96.
Fong, P. (2006). Complexity theory and Macaos’ school curriculum management system. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Educational Research Association International Conference. November 2006. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education. In Morrison, K. (2006). Complexity theory and education. Retrieved from
http://edisdat.ied.edu.hk/pubarch/b15907314/full_paper/SYI
Eichholz, G., & Rodgers, E. (1964). Resistance to adoption of audio visual aids by elementary school teachers. In Miles, E. (1964). Innovation in education. New York: Teachers college, Columbia University.
Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research.47(1), 335-97.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Columbia University Press.
Goodlad, J., Klein, F., & Tyek, K. (1979). “The domains of curriculum and their study in Curriculum inquiry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Glatthorn, A. (1987). Curriculum renewal. Alexandria, Va, :Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. In Montero-Sierburth. (1992). Models and practice of curriculum change in developing countries: Comparative Education Review, 36(2)
175-193.
Jansen, J. (1998). Curriculum reforms in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28 (3), 321-331.
Morrison, K. (2006). Complexity theory and education. Retrieved from
http://edisdat.ied.edu.hk/pubarch/b15907314/full_paper/SYI
Kritson’s, A. (2005). Comparison of change theories. International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 8(1).
Lewin, K. (1947). 'Frontiers in group dynamics', in: D. Cartwright (Ed.) (1952): Field Theory in social Science. Social Science Paperbacks: London.
Mebrahtu, T. (1984). “Curriculum change for international awareness” in Education and Development. New York: Groom Helm.
Montero-Sierburth. (1992). Models and practice of curriculum change in developing countries: Comparative Education Review, 36(2) 175-193.
Morrison, K. (2008). What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(1).
Noruiga, B. (2006). Complexity theory and nursing education in Macau. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Educational Research Association International Conference. November 2006, Hong Kong Institute of Education. In Morrison, K. (2006). Complexity theory and education. Retrieved from
http://edisdat.ied.edu.hk/pubarch/b15907314/full_paper/SYI
Ndou, N. (2008). The role of educational management teams in change management: A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Masters of education at the University of South Africa.
Otunga, R., Odero, I., & Barasa, P. (2011). A Handbook for curriculum and Instruction. Eldoret: Moi University Press.
Schmenner, R., & Swink, M. (1997). On theory in operations management. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/6370789/on_theory_in-operations_management
Shiundu, J., & Omulando, S. (1992). Curriculum theory and practice in Kenya. Oxford University Press, Nairobi.
Stacey, R. (2002). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London Routledge.
Tong, K. (2006). The external agent as a creator of complex conditions for change. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Educational Research Association International Conference. November 2006, Hong Kong Institute of Education. In Morrison, K. (2006). Complexity theory and education. Retrieved from
http://edisdat.ied.edu.hk/pubarch/b15907314/full_paper/SYI
Tchiang, V. (2006). Complexity theory, parental involvement and impact of economic forces on Macao secondary education. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Educational Research Association International Conference. November 2006. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education. In Morrison, K. (2006). Complexity theory and education. Retrieved from
http://edisdat.ied.edu.hk/pubarch/b15907314/full_paper/SYI
Thompson, R. (2013). Lewin's change management model. Understanding the three stages of Change. Retrieved from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_94.htm
Yvone, H. (2010). Higher education in a complex world: making sense of policy (0029). Retrieved from http://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference 2010/abstracts/0029.pdf
http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10539/5908/Chapter%202.pdf?sequence=12
In-Text Citation: (Amimo et al., 2014)
To Cite this Article: Amimo, C. A., Bosire, J., & Role, E. (2014). Theoretical Underpinnings of Curriculum Change in Developing Economies: Is Complexity Theory the New Wine in Lewins’ Old Wineskin? International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(3), 36–47.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode