ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Agriculture sector has become a strategic sector for all the countries in the world in the 21st century, because unhealthy, wrong and inadequate nutrition affects human health and health expenses negatively. On the other hand, arising food expenses collaterally with population growth arises the percentage of agriculture sector in the Gross National Product (GNP). Turkish Agricultural Activities Standard (TAS 41) will be leading for recording and controlling fiscally countries’ agricultural activities and preventing resource waste via right agriculture policies. The aim of the study is to lead legal authorities and applicators by identifying current and prospective problems of the countries whose economies depend on agriculture and will start applying the standard, like Turkey. For this purpose, literature search was done on periodical articles in national and international indexes since 2006.
Agca, A., Saglam, N. (2008).Turkiye Muhasebe Standartlari Uygulamasi (Yorum-Aciklama- Ornekler), TAS-41: Tarimsal Faaliyetler, (2.rd ed.), Ankara: Maliye ve hukuk publications.
Akbiyik, A. A., and Yesiltepe, N. (2011). Sarapcilik Sektorune Muhasebe Acisindan Bir Bakis, ISMMMO Yayin Organi Mali Cozum, 69, pp. 239-247.
Aytulun, A. (2010). Ciftlik Muhasebesi, [Online] Available:
file:///C:/Users/halukduman/Desktop/TMS-41%20Literat%C3%BCr/%C3%87iftlik%20Muhasebesi%20%20%20%C4%B0ktisadi%20Dayan%C4%B1%C5%9Fma%20%20%20%C4%B0ktisadi%20Haber%20Ajans%C4%B1.htm (12.10.2011)
Arzova, B., Arsoy, A. P. (2006). TAS-41 Tarimsal Faaliyetler Cercevesinde Canli Varliklarin Muhasebelestirilmesi ve Finansal Tablolarda Sunulusu, Vergi Dünyasi, 300, pp. 135-147.
Demirkol, O. F. (2011). Finansal Tablo Duzenleme Sikli?ina ve Kullanilan Hesap Donemine Gore Canli Varliklarda Degerleme, Ankara SMMMO Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamalari, 1, pp. 103-108.
Demirkol, O. F. (2008). Canli Varliklarin Gerce?e Uygun Degerini Belirleme Hiyerarsisi, Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamalari, 2, pp. 113-124.
Donmez, D., Tepge, A. (2011). ABD, AB ve Turkiye’ de Maliyet Hesaplama Yontemleri, Tarimsal Ekonomi ve Politika Gelistirme Enstitüsü TEPGE Bakis, 3, p. 3.
Gunduz, O., Dagdeviren, M. (2011). Bafra ?lcesinde Sut Maliyetinin Belirlenmesi ve Uretimi Etkileyen Faktorlerin Fonksiyonel Analizi, YYU Ziraat Fakültesi Tarim Bilimleri, 2: 2, pp. 104.
Hatipoglu, A. G. (2012). Tarimsal Urunlerin Muhasebelestirilme Ilkelerinin Ulusal Duzenlemeler Acisindan Karsilastirilmasi, K.S.U. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9: 1, pp. 87-102.
Karakaya, M. (2009). An Overwiew to Accounting Applications on Agricultural Activities in Turkey Within Historical Progress, African Journal of Business Management, 3: 7, pp. 294-295.
Kirlioglu, H., Gokgoz, A. (2012). TAS-41 Cercevesinde Tarimsal Faaliyetlerin Muhasebelestirilmesi: Su Urunleri Sektor Uygulamasi, Ataturk Universitesi ?ktisadi ve ?dari Bilimler Fakültesi, 26: 2, pp. 107-127.
Kizilaslan, H., Adiguzel, O. (2007). Factors Affecting Credit Use in Agricultural Business Concerns in Turkey, Research Journal of Agriculture and biologicial Sciences, 3:5, p. 416.
Orten, R., Kaval, H., Karapinar, A. (2008). Turkiye Muhasebe – Finansal Raporlama Standartlari Uygulamasi ve Yorumlari, (2. rd ed.), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Ozulucan, A., Deran, A. (2008). 41 No’ lu Turkiye Muhasebe Standardi (TMS 41), Vergi Usul Kanunu ve Tek Düzen Hesap Plani Acisindan Kucuk ve Buyukbas Canli Varliklarin Muhasebelestirilmesi ve Degerleme ?sleminde Karsilasilan Guclukler ve Cozum Onerileri, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2:25, pp. 1-22.
Parlakkaya, R., Tuncez, H. A. (2011). TMS 41 Tarimsal Faaliyet Kapsaminda Hayvancilik ?sletmelerinde Muhasebe Uygulamasi, Muhasebe ve Bilim Dunyasi Dergisi, 4, pp. 143-174.
Sonmez, F. (2004). Tarimsal Faaliyetlerin Muhasebelestirilmesi (25 No’ lu SPK Tebliginin 31. Kisim Hukumleriyle Desteklenmis Olarak), ISMMMO Yayin Organi Mali Cozum, 69, pp. 143-169.
Tokay, S. H., Deran, A. (2011). Tarim Sektorunde ve Tarim Sektorunun Onemli Bir Alt Dali Olan Meyve Bahcesi Isletmelerinde Muhasebenin Geregi, Belge ve Defter Düzeni, Nigde Universitesi IIBF, 4:1, pp. 40-55.
Tokay, S. H., Deran, A. (2006). Tarim Faaliyetlerinin Muhasebelestirilmesinde Turk Vergi Mevzuati Ile Sermaye Piyasasi Kurulu Tarafindan Getirilen Duzenlemelerin Karsilastirilmasi I-I, Yakla?im, 157-158, 17-21 / 28-33. (Temmuz- A?ustos).
Tuncez, H. A. (2011). Vergi Usul Kanunu ve Turkiye Muhasebe Standardi -41 Cercevesinde Canli Varliklara Iliskin Amortisman ?slemleri ve Karsilastirilmasi, Uluslararasi Hakemli Akademik Sosyal Bilimler, 2: 1, pp. 69-84.
Ulusan, H. (2008). Turk Muhasebe Hukuku Cercevesinde Devlet Tesviklerinin Muhasebelestirilmesi ve Raporlanmasi, Atatürk University ?ktisadi ve ?dari Bilimler Fakültesi, 22: 2, pp. 415-433.
Usul, H., Ve Top, T. (2010). TMS 41’ e Gore Buyukbas Hayvancilik Faaliyetlerinin Muhasebelestirilmesi ve Degerlemesi, Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakis, 31, pp. 65-76.
In-Text Citation: (Duman et al., 2012)
To Cite this Article: Duman, H., Ozpeynirci, R., & Icerli, M. Y. (2012). Agricultural Activities – TAS 41: Turkey Example. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 2(3), 1–21.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode