Production of English Vowel by Libyan EFL learners: Insights from Unnormalized and Normalized Data

Kalthoum  Ramadan; Yap Ngee  Thai

Previous studies have established that male and female speakers differ in their production of foreign language (FL) vowels due to biological differences in the vocal tract. These differences present a challenge when subjects recruited for an instrumental analysis of speech sounds include speakers of both genders. Most previous studies, therefore, focus on only one gender to avoid the problem of biological differences between males and females. However, different gender groups may perform differently in speaking tasks as their language experience may be influenced by other social factors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the differences between Libyan male and female speakers in the production of English vowels, by examining the data with and without the use of normalization to determine the most difficult English vowels for Libyan male and female speakers. To achieve this goal, seventy Libyan participants (35 male and 35 female) were recruited to perform a speech production task of eleven English vowels embedded in carrier sentences. The data were collected and analyzed using PRAAT to extract the F1 and F2 formant frequencies for each vowel and to calculate the Euclidean distance (ED) of the English vowels produced by using the centroid as the reference point. With the unnormalized data, more overlaps were found for the male speakers when compared to the female speakers as the vowel space were more centred for the males compared to the females. With the unnormalized data, different pairs of vowel contrasts were identified as potentially problematic. However, with the normalized data, better categorical distinction is found in general. Only three vowels emerged as potentially problematic as the other pairs could potentially be disambiguated using vowel duration as a cue. The study demonstrated the utility of the Lobanov method for normalizing speech data to reduce variability associated to gender differences. The efficacy of the Lobanov method of normalization remains to be tested further to verify if the predictions made about difficult vowel pairs for Libyan EFL learners are indeed attested in their discrimination of these vowel pairs in future research.

Ababneh, I. (2018). English pronunciation errors made by Saudi students. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(2), 244-261.
Abbasi, A. M., Channa, M. A., John, S., Memon, M. A., & Anwar, R. (2018). An Acoustic Investigation of Pakistani and American English Vowels. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4).
Abdullahi, J., Thai, Y. N., Rashid, S. M., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2019). Cross-Language perception of non-native stops and fricatives among Malay and Hausa native speakers. Journal of Language and Communication (JLC), 6(1), 307-321.
Adank, P. M. (2003). Vowel normalization. A perceptual acoustic study of Dutch vowels. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Adank, P., Smits, R., & Van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3099-3107.
Al-Abdely, A. A. W., & Yap, N. T. (2016). Learning English vowels by Iraqi EFL learners: perceived difficulty versus actual performance. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 22(1).: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 22(1).
Al-Hamadi, H. M. (2012). Acoustic Analysis of English Pure Vowels in Clear and Conversational Speech: An Experimental Study at the University of Basra. The Arab Gulf, 40(3-4).
Ali, E. M. T. (2013). Pronunciation problems: Acoustic analysis of the English vowels produced by Sudanese learners of English. International Journal of English and Literature, 4(10), 495-507.
Almbark, R. (2012). The perception and production of SSBE vowels by Syrian Arabic learners: The foreign language model (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).
Al-Rubaat, A. M., & Alshammari, H. A. (2020). Analysis of Phonetic and Phonological Constraints of Saudi EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 13(1).
Atanda, A. F., Yusof, S. M., & Husni, H. (2017). Acoustic Analysis of Nigerian English Vowels Based on Accents. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(3-7), 13-20.
Bello, H., Yap, N. T., Chan, M. Y., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2020a). Intelligibility of English vowels produced by Nigerian and Malaysian speakers, Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 2020, 11(2), 81–94.
Bello, H., Yap, N. T., Chan, M. Y., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2020b). An acoustic analysis of English vowels produced by Nigerian and Malaysian ESL speakers. Journal of Language and Communication (JLC), 7(1), 561-575.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0. 37)[Computer software]. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences.
Chladkova, K., & Podlipský, J. V. (2011). Native dialect matters: Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), EL186-EL192.
Chouchane, A. (2016). Pronunciation difficulties for Arab learners of English. Global English -Oriented Research Journal (GEORJ), 2(2), 205-2015.
Clopper, C. G. (2009). Computational methods for normalizing acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(6), 1430-1442.
Deterding, D. (1997). The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27(1-2), 47-55.
Emran, A. M., & LB, D. A. (2017). The Errors of Segmental Phonemes among Libyans English Students Studying in Semarang City, Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 183-197.
Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406-EL412.
Fabricius, A. H. (2008). Vowel normalisation in sociophonetics: When, why, how. Sociolinguistics Circle, Copenhagen University, September, 16.
Fabricius, A. H., Watt, D., & Johnson, D. E. (2009). A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change, 21(3), 413-435.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience, 233-277.
Flynn, N. (2011). Comparing vowel formant normalisation procedures. York papers in linguistics, 2(11), 1-28.
Fraser, H. (2010). Cognitive theory as a tool for teaching pronunciation. In Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 357-380). De Gruyter Mouton.
Haji, S. S., & Mohammed, F. O. (2019). An Analysis of the Pronouncing of English Monophthongs by Kurdish EFL University Students (Northern Kurmanji Speakers). Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 7(4), 515-524.
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S., & Watson, C. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 30(1-2), 63-78.
Hubais, A. & Pillai, S. (2010). An instrumental analysis of English vowels produced by Omanis. Journal of Modern Languages, 20(1), 1-18.
Hunter, G., & Yarkiner, Z. (2014). Formant frequencies of British English vowels produced by native speakers of Cypriot Turkish. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 36, 452-459.
Kachru, B. B. (1997). World Englishes and English-using communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 66-87.
Kalaldeh, R. (2018). Acoustic analysis of Modern Standard Arabic vowels by Jordanian speakers. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 18(1), 23-48.
Khalil, S. (2014). Comparative study of the acoustic vowel space of Egyptian English vowels and general American English vowels. Linguistic Portfolios, 3(1), 8.
Koffi, E. (2019). An Acoustic Phonetic Analysis of the Intelligibility of Nepali-Accented English Vowels. Linguistic Portfolios, 8(1), 9.
Ladefoged, P. (2003). Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Wiley-Blackwell.
Langstrof, C. (2006). Vowel change in New Zealand English-patterns and implications. PhD Dissertation. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury.
Mahfouz, I. M. (2017). Analysis of Errors in the Transcription of Simple English Vowels (Monophthongs) by Egyptian Phonetics Students. Journal of the Faculty of Education - Alexandria University, 27(1), 273-307.?
Munro, M. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36, 39-66.
Pathan, M., Aldersi, Z., & Alsout, E. (2014). Speaking in their language: An overview of major difficulties faced by the Libyan EFL learners in speaking skill. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 2(3), 96-105.
Reyes, P. Y. I. (2014). Perception and production of English vowels by Chilean learners of English: effect of auditory and visual modalities on phonetic training (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London).
Ramadan, K. (2021). Acoustic similarity and perceptual similarity between Tripolitania-Libyan Arabic vowels and English vowels produced by Libyan EFL learners (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universiti Putra Malaysia. Malaysia.
Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.
Rosner, P. (1994). Rosner, Burton S.; Pickering. J. Brian. Vowel Perception and Production. New York: Oxford University Press.
Setyaningsih, K. P., Wijayanto, A., & Suparno, S. (2019). English Vowels and Diphthongs Problems of Sudanese Learners. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(4), 571-581.
Sulong, S. (2016). Malaysian English Monophthongs by Regional Malay Dialect Speakers: Convergence or Divergence?. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 10(2).
Syrdal, A. K., & Gopal, H. S. (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79(4), 1086-1100.
Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite. Online Resource. URL: Accessed: 17/11/2008.
Walker, R. (2010). Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca (Vol. 345). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watt, D., Fabricius, A., & Kendall, T. (2010). More on vowels: Plotting and normalization. In Sociophonetics: A student's guide (pp. 107-118). Routledge.
Yang, B., & Whalen, D. H. (2015). Perception and production of English vowels by American males and females. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 121-141.

In-Text Citation: (Ramadan & Thai, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Ramadan, K., & Thai, Y. N. (2021). Production of English Vowel by Libyan EFL learners: Insights from Unnormalized and Normalized Data. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 1586–1603.

Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

Production of English Vowel by Libyan EFL learners: Insights from Unnormalized and Normalized Data

Kalthoum Ramadan, Yap Ngee Thai

Further Information

Our Journals

Get intouch with us