Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Providing Corrective Feedback On Esl Students’ Writing During Open And Distance Learning (Odl)

Nurshaza Farah Md Sharif, Nor Afifa Nordin, Nursyafiqah Zabidin, Nurul Fatinah Dellah

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10386

Open access

Covid-19 pandemic has altered the landscape of education, including language acquisition, where teaching and learning now takes place virtually. Therefore, educators are required to adapt to the sudden changes in teaching scenario. Language instructors face challenges in teaching language skills especially writing in open and distance learning. One of the most crucial building blocks in improving language learners’ writing skill is the feedback they receive on their writing. This has proven to be the main challenge as giving feedback to students can no longer be given through face-to-face interaction. Thus, this study aimed to explore the practices applied by English language lecturers in providing corrective feedback on ESL students' essay writing during ODL and the underlying reasons for their choices of practices. Focusing on qualitative research method, 10 respondents were interviewed to collect data on the practices they applied in providing corrective feedback on their learners’ essay writing during ODL and reasons for the practices they chose. The thematic analysis revealed various practices were adopted mainly to suit and support the needs of the students as well as the preference of the lecturers themselves. The respondents also shared some suggestions to improve the practices in providing corrective feedback on students’ writing during ODL.

Chang, N., Watson, B., Bakerson, M. A., & McGoron, F. X. (2013). Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Electronic and Handwritten Feedback: A Follow-up Study across an Entire Midwestern University Campus. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2(2), 21.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ flan.12183.
Farrah, M., Zahida, R., & Zaru, N. (2014). The Impact of Three Types of Written Feedback on the Motivation and Writing Skill of English Major Students at Hebron University ????? ????? ????? ?? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????? ???????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?????????? ?? ????? ??????. An - Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities).. 28. 1275-1297.
Glenn, C., & Goldthwaite, M. A. (2014). The St. Martin’s Guide to Teaching Writing (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Hamidun, N., Hizwari, S., & Othman, N. F. (2013). Enhancing Students’ Motivation by Providing Feedback on Writing: The Case of International Students from Thailand. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. 591-594. 10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.179.
Iksan, H., & Halim, H. A. (2018). The Effect of E-Feedback via Wikis on ESL Students’ L2 Writing Anxiety Level. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 30-48.
Keh, C. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. English Language Teaching Journal. 44. 294-304. 10.1093/elt/44.4.294.
Nanthinii, M. (2020). A study of Google Classroom as an effective LMS To Improve The LSRW Skills of ESL Learners. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 9(6), 1116-1119.
Nematzadeh, F., & Siahpoosh, H. (2017). The Effect of Teacher Direct and Indirect Feedback on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Written Performance. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 3(5) DOI: 10.5923/j.jalll.20170305.02, 110-116.
Parkin, H., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A Role for Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement with Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963-973.
Rahman, M. N. (2017). Incorporating Different Forms of Feedback in Teaching Writing: An Insight into a Real Classroom. BELTA Journal. 1. 10.36832/beltaj.2017.0101.04.
Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-Mediated Text-Based and Audio-Based Corrective Feedback, Perceptual Style and L2 Development. System, 82, 97-110.
Saidon, M. A., Said, N. E. M., Soh, T. M. T., & Husnin, H. (2018). ESL Students’ Perception of Teacher’s Written Feedback Practice in Malaysian Classrooms. Creative Education, 9, 2300-2310. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914170
Saima, G., Joyshree, N., Shalabh, A., & Asoke, N. (2021). Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Education System: Past, Present And Future – A Systematic Study Of An Alternative Education System. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science. 3(4). 53-57
Seliem, S., & Ahmed, S. (2009). Missing: Electronic feedback in Egyptian EFL Essay Writing Classes. Paper Presented at CDELT Conference, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505841.pdf
Shintani, N. (2016). The Effects of Computer-Mediated Synchronous and Asynchronous Direct Corrective Feedback on Writing: A Case Study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.993400.
Tee, K. (2014). An Analysis of Written Feedback on ESL Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 123. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1437.
Towobola, W. L., & Raimi, L. (2011). Open Distance Learning (Odl): A Catalyst For Educational and Entrepreneurship Development in Nigeria. Continental J. Education Research. 4(3). 1-11
Tuzi, F. (2001). E-feedback’s Impact on ESL Writers’ Revisions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), St. Louis, MO, February 27–March 3.
Walker, D. (2017). Empowering English Writing Students: Reflecting on Aspects of the Process That Helped Me Most?. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching. 20. 85-93. 10.24071/llt.2017.200202.
Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated Writing Evaluation: Defining the Classroom Research Agenda. Language Teaching Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 157-180 (2006).
Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (2020). Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Employed by University English Lecturers: A Teacher Cognition Perspective. SAGE Open 1–12 DOI: 10.1177/2158244020934886, 1-12.
Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura. 22. 17-32. 10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02.
Widyaningsih, T. L. (2018). An Analysis of Online Corrective Feedback Implementation in Writing Class. BRIGHT: A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 2(1).
Westmaco, A. (2017). Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017 Universidad de Antioquia.
Wicaksono, W. P. (2017). Types and Frequencies of Written Corrective Feedbacks in Adult ESL Classroom. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies Vol. 3, No. 2, 60-67.
Wihastyanang, W. D., Kusumaningrum, S. R., Latief, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Impacts of Providing Online Teacher and Peer Feedback on Students' Writing Performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE Volume: 21 Number: 2 Article 12 ISSN 1302-6488, 178-189.
Xhama, L. (2018). Corrective Feedback in Writing Essay in the L2 Classrooms. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 7. 19-24. 10.2478/ajis-2018-0002.
Zarei, M., Ahour, T., Seifoori, Z. (2020). Impacts of implicit, explicit, and emergent feedback strategies on EFL learners’ motivation, attitude and perception. Cogent Education. 7. 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1727130.

In-Text Citation: (Sharif et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Sharif, N. F. M., Nordin, N. A., Zabidin, N., & Dellah, N. F. (2021). Providing Corrective Feedback On Esl Students’ Writing During Open And Distance Learning (Odl). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1592–1601.