ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
External factors such as political actors along with journalistic practice influence the news frames, selection of news sources and tone embedded in news. Following the landmark 14th Malaysia General Election, political changes leading to the election also opened opportunities for reform in the Malaysian media landscape. Since the election, there have been calls for local scholars to revisit the new Malaysian media environment and re-evaluate the functions and roles of the media. To answer the question from the perspective of a framing theory framework, this paper will examine the contest for news frames in the coverage of Malaysian mainstream newspapers on the 1MDB scandal, the primary political issue covered in the run-up to GE14. Previous research posits that a winning party will have an edge over and will dominate frames in the media. The main factor for the presence of frames is the power of a political organisation that promotes frames. The idea that the new government will become the major frame setter is also reinforced by the indexing hypothesis. When the news explicitly slants, the politicians supported by the slant gain more influence and are empowered to do whatever they want without fear of being punished by voters. Those who are defeated in the framing competition become weaker, with less freedom to do and say as they please. The focus of this study then will be to understand how, in the aftermath of General Election 14, has Malaysian mainstream media changed in its framing of the 1MDB issue after the loss of the ruling coalition. Specifically, it attempts to understand the relationship that political actors have on news frames, tone and use of sources on the 1MDB issue between the period before and after the 14th General Election, to discover if Malaysian mainstream media has started to evolve beyond the development model.
Ahmad, M. K., & Othman, M. B. (2014). General election and the enigma of free press in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 547-552.
An, S.-K., & Gower, K. K. (2009). How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 107-112.
Anuar, M. K. (2003). The role of Malaysia’s mainstream press in the 1999 general election. New Politics in Malaysia. Singapore: ISEAS, 53-65.
Anuar, M. K. (2014). Defining democratic discourses: the mainstream press. In Democracy in Malaysia (pp. 152-178): Routledge.
Bennett, W. L. (1992). The governing crisis: Media, money, and marketing in American elections: St. Martin's Press New York.
Berkowitz, D., & Beach, D. W. (1993). News sources and news context: The effect of routine news, conflict and proximity. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 4-12.
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of communication, 61(2), 246-263.
Boydstun, A. (2014). Dallas Card, Justin H. Gross, Philip Resnik, and Noah A. Smith.
Brants, K., De Vreese, C., Möller, J., & Van Praag, P. (2010). The real spiral of cynicism? Symbiosis and mistrust between politicians and journalists. The international journal of press/politics, 15(1), 25-40.
Brunken, B. L. (2006). Hurricane Katrina: A content analysis of media framing, attribute agenda setting, and tone of government response.
Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good: Oxford University Press.
Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of communication, 54(2), 214-233.
Cho, S. H., & Gower, K. K. (2006). Framing effect on the public's response to crisis: Human interest frame and crisis type influencing responsibility and blame. Public Relations Review, 32(4), 420-422.
D'Haenens, L., & De Lange, M. (2001). Framing of asylum seekers in Dutch regional newspapers. Media, Culture & Society, 23(6), 847-860.
De Vreese, & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28(4), 361-381.
De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information design journal & document design, 13(1).
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.
Funston, J. (2018). Malaysia's 14th General Election (GE14)-The Contest for the Malay Electorate. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 57-83.
Gans, H. J. (1979). Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America. Ethnic and racial studies, 2(1), 1-20.
Gitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left: Univ of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience: Harvard University Press.
Gortner, E.-M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The archival anatomy of a disaster: Media coverage and community-wide health effects of the Texas A&M bonfire tragedy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(5), 580-603.
Guenduez, A. A., Schedler, K., & Ciocan, D. (2016). Generic frames and tonality: Mapping a polarizing issue in a multifaceted context. European journal of communication, 31(5), 584-599.
Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27(2), 141-157.
Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In Framing public life (pp. 157-178): Routledge.
Holody, K. J. (2006). Framing death: The use of frames in newspaper coverage of and press releases about death with dignity. Virginia Tech,
Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political behavior, 12(1), 19-40.
Iyengar, S. (1994). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59-70.
Joslyn, M. R. (2003). Framing the Lewinsky Affair: Third?Person Judgments by Scandal Frame. Political Psychology, 24(4), 829-844.
Kenyon, A. T., & Marjoribanks, T. (2007). Transforming media markets: The cases of Malaysia and Singapore. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 5(2), 103-118.
Kim, S.-H., Carvalho, J. P., & Cooksey, C. E. (2007). Exploring the effects of negative publicity: News coverage and public perceptions of a university. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 233-235.
Kozman, C. (2017). Measuring issue-specific and generic frames in the media’s coverage of the steroids issue in baseball. Journalism Practice, 11(6), 777-797.
Liebler, C. M., & Bendix, J. (1996). Old-growth forests on network news: News sources and the framing of an environmental controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 53-65.
Liu, Y. J., Wang, M. C., & Zhao, L. (2010). Narrow framing: Professions, sophistication, and experience. Journal of Futures Markets: Futures, Options, and Other Derivative Products, 30(3), 203-229.
Lumsden, K., & Morgan, H. (2017). Media framing of trolling and online abuse: silencing strategies, symbolic violence, and victim blaming. Feminist Media Studies, 17(6), 926-940.
Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic public diplomacy and American foreign policy: The evolution of influence: Oxford University Press New York.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
McLeod, D. M., & Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of communication, 49(3), 3-23.
McManus, J. H. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? : Sage Publications.
Nazmi, S., & Rahim, M. H. A. (2016). The Reporting on the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1mdb) Crisis and Implication on Efficacy of Economic and Financial News Reporting in Malaysia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(10) 12-21.
Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning: University of Chicago Press.
Paletz, D. L., & Entman, R. M. (1981). Media power politics: Free Press.
Sani, M., & Azizuddin, M. (2014). The Social Media Election in Malaysia: The 13th General Election in 2013. Kajian Malaysia: Journal of Malaysian Studies, 32.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). Party government: Transaction Publishers.
Scheufele, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Of Spreading Activation, Applicability, and Schemas Conceptual Distinctions and Their Operational Implications. P. D’Angelo & JA Kuypers, Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Schuck, A. R., & De Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European journal of communication, 21(1), 5-32.
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149-170.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication, 50(2), 93-109.
Sentinel, A. (2010). Malaysia’s brain drain. Url: http://www. asiasentinel. com/index. php.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: White Plains, NY: Longman.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. Frontiers in social movement theory, 133, 155.
Steimel, S. J. (2010). Refugees as people: The portrayal of refugees in American human interest stories. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(2), 219-237.
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1980). Community conflict and the press (Vol. 8): SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication research, 26(5), 550-569.
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of communication, 57(1), 60-78.
Wolfsfeld, G., & Gadi, W. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, J. (2003). Framing the NATO air strikes on Kosovo across countries: Comparison of Chinese and US newspaper coverage. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 65(3), 231-249.
In-Text Citation: (Ahmad et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Ahmad, A., Ghazali, A. H. A., Zawawi, J. W. M., & Razi, S. A. H. M. (2021). Comparative Framing Analysis of the 1malaysia Development Berhad Issue in Malaysian Mainstream Newspapers Post Ge-14. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(15), 77–92.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode