Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2225-8329

Creating and Controlling the Ethical Framework of Mediation

Gabriel - Cristian Constantinescu

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v4-i3/1071

Open access

The mediator can play an active role in creating the ethical framework in the conflict mediation. A pyramidal hierarchy of ethics principles in mediation is proposed: mediator’s ethics/legality and morality of the negotiation subject/ethics in the communication between negotiators/ethics of the procedures, techniques and tactics of negotiation. Exercising a triple role (personal example of ethics, generator of negotiation ethics rules, guarantor of minimal ethical framework), the mediators can become the creators of the mediation ethical framework. This ethical framework created by the mediator can be controlled through techniques systematized in a methodology for neutralizing unethical impulses of the negotiators involved in mediation. The proposed method selects a range of possible interventions depending on the orientation of negotiators identified by the mediator - to objective or to relationship. The mediator can use these techniques without exceeding its role of neutral and impartial person. The pro-active attitude of the mediator in the mediation ethical framework construction is identified as the key to reach equitable agreements and the future commitment of the parties.

Anton, R. J. (1990). Drawing the line: an exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiations, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 1, issue 3, pp. 265-280.
Aquino, K. (1998). The Effects of Ethical Climate and the Availability of Alternatives on the Use of Deception during Negotiation, International Journal of Conflict Management, vol.9, issue 3, pp. 195-217.
Aquino, K., Becker, T. E. (2005). Lying in negotiations: how individual and situational factors influence the use of neutralization strategies, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (6), pp. 661-679.
Bowling, D., Hoffman, D. (editors) (2003). Bringing Peace into the Room: How the Personal Quality of the Mediator Impact the Process of Conflict Resolution, Ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Fleck, D., Volkema, R., Pereira, S., Levy, B., & Vaccari, L. (2014). Neutralizing Unethical Negotiating Tactics: An Empirical Investigation of Approach Selection and Effectiveness, Negotiation Journal, Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 23-48.
Gill-Austern, G. (2000). Faithfull, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Volume 2000, issue 2, pp. 343-369.
Gollan, D., Folberg, J. (2006). Mediation: The Roles of Advocate and Neutral, Aspen Pub, p. 95.
Kaufmann, P. J., Stern, L. W. (1988). Relational Exchange Norms, Perceptions of Unfairness, and Retained Hostility in Commercial Litigation, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 534-552.
Kolb, D. M. (1984). The Mediators, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Meltzer, B. N. (2003). Lying: Deception in Human Affairs, the International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23 (6/7), pp. 61-80.
Moore, C. W. (2014). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflicts, 4th Edition, Ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Ross, W. T., Robertson, D. C. (2000). Lying: The impact of Decision Context, Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, (2), pp. 409-440.
Shell, R. G. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People (2nd ed.), Penguin Books, p.191.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal, Psychological Review, Vol. 110, No. 3, 403– 421.
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science, New Series, Vol. 211, No. 4481, pp. 453-458.
Volkema, R. J., Rivers, C. (2012). Beyond frogs and scorpions: A risk-based framework for understanding negotiating counterparts ethical motivations, Negotiation Journal, 28 (4), pp. 379-405.

In-Text Citation: (Constantinescu, 2014)
To Cite this Article: Constantinescu, G.-C. (2014). Creating and Controlling the Ethical Framework of Mediation. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 4(3), 187–195.