Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Exploring University Students’ Acceptance of Open Distance Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Alice Shanthi, Afni Anida Adnan, Nur Izzah Jamil, Alia Nadira bte Rosle, Evelyn Sharminnie

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i10/11009

Open access

The technology acceptance model (TAM) can be used to study the success of Online Distance Learning (ODL) as a teaching and learning approach. ODL became the only tool available due to the Covid-19 pandemic, which disrupted the learning process in Malaysia and the world over. ODL took the place of traditional classrooms and created new chances for students and teachers to interact and communicate. This study investigates students' acceptance of ODL as an acceptable learning approach among undergraduates in Malaysia. This research makes three contributions. First, this research may aid in determining whether learners or users prefer ODL. Second, this research will aid in identifying the characteristics that significantly influence the intention to use ODL. Third, this research also provides insights into whether variables like perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness impact ODL acceptance as a learning tool. The findings reveal that ODL was not a popular choice of learning approach among students. Although students had a positive perception of ODL, the student's attitude and intention to use ODL for future learning were lacking.

Abbas, A. H. (2018). Risk as Determinant of Actual Usage in TAMmodel: Application of E-Government in the State of Kuwait. International Conference on Management, Leadership and Business Intelligence.
Abdul Aziz, A. (2020). Let’s Buck Up! Don’t Let COVID-19 Disrupt Our Education. Bernama News. https://www.bernama.com/en/thoughts/news.php?id=1881728
Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2011). Modeling the electronic transactions acceptance using an extended technology acceptance model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2009.04.001
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
Landry, B., Griffith, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of Blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Science, 4(1), 87–99.
Lim, I. (2020). Reality for Malaysia’s university students: Online learning challenges, stress, workload; possible solutions for fully digital future until Dec. The News Staraits Times.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. (Information Systems Research, 2(2), 173–191.
Mofareh, A. (2019). The Use of Technology in English Language Teaching. Frontiers in Education Technology, 2(3), p168. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v2n3p168
Oxford, R. (2006). Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning: An Overview. Asian EFL Journal, 8.
Quong, J., Snider, S., & Early, J. (2018). Reducing Transactional Distance in Online and Blended Courses Through the Use of a Closed Social Media Platform. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47, 004723951876665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518766654
Rahman, S., Yunus, M., & Hashim, H. (2019). A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Malaysian ESL Lecturers’ Attitude in Adapting Flipped Learning. Malaysian Journal of Education, 44, 43–54.
Sidek, R. E. A., & Yunus, M. (2012). Students’ Experiences on using Blog as Learning Journals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67(November 2011), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.314
Ranellucci, J., Rosenberg, J., & Poitras, E. (2020). Exploring pre?service teachers’ use of technology: The technology acceptance model and expectancy–value theory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12459
Ratna, P. A., & Mehra, S. (2015). Exploring the acceptance for e-learning using technology acceptance model among university students in India. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 5(2), 194–210.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2015.068667
Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 Impact on Shifting Higher Education to Distance Learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition). International Journal of Information Technology and Management - IJITM.
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science, 42, 85–92.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2007). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test*. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Waluyo, B. (2020). Learning Outcomes of a General English Course Implementing Multiple E- learning Technologies and Active Learning Concepts. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17(1), 160–181.

In-Text Citation: (Shanthi et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Shanthi, A., Adnan, A. A., Jamil, N. I., Rosle, A. N. bte, & Sharminnie, E. (2021). Exploring University Students’ Acceptance of Open Distance Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(10), 250–262.