Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

An Integrated Approach of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (AHP-DEMATEL) to Solve the Supplier Selection Problem

Nur Dayana Abdul Rahman, Elza Fazwin Mersing, Nur Syafieqah Syazuween Mohd Yazid, Nor Faradilah Mahad

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11155

Open access

It is crucial to select the best supplier for a company because the product development will be affected when the wrong supplier is selected. In this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is implemented to choose the best supplier for a printing company. However, the AHP method could not identify the influence among criteria. Therefore, it is integrated with the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. The objectives of this study are to select the best supplier for a printing company and determining the interrelationship between the criteria by identifying the influences of each criterion to other criteria. A discussion with the decision-maker was held to finalize the criteria and suppliers used in this study. The criteria used are cost (C1), quality (C2), relationship with the supplier (C3), warranty (C4), and machinery safety (C5), while the chosen alternatives are Supplier 1 (S1), Supplier 2 (S2), and Supplier 3 (S3). Experimental results show that the ranking order for the criteria is C1 > C5 > C2 > C4 > C3, and the ranking order for the supplier is S2 > S3 > S1, which concludes that S2 is the best supplier to supply the printing machine to the company. As for the interrelationship between criteria, the criterion that highly influences the other criteria is quality (C2), and the less influential criterion is the warranty (C4). To conclude, the proposed method is appropriate in selecting the best supplier since the findings correspond to the decision maker's choices. Furthermore, this method provides relevant information to the decision-maker about the interrelationship between each criterion and which criterion should be given more attention.

Abdul Rashid, N. S., Amin, M. N. A., & Mahad, N. F. (2020). Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process For Contractor Selection Problem. Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 258–276.
Balsara, S., Jain, P. K., & Ramesh, A. (2019). An integrated approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating climate change mitigation strategies of the Indian cement manufacturing industry. Environmental Pollution, 252, 863–878.
Bauer, C., & Colgan, J. (2001). Planning for electronic commerce strategy: an explanatory study from the financial services sector. Logistics Information Management, 14(1/2), 24–32.
Campos, M., Jimenez, F., Sanchez, G., Juarez, J. M., Morales, A., Canovas-Segura, B., & Palacios, F. (2020). A methodology based on multiple criteria decision analysis for combining antibiotics in empirical therapy. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 102, 101751.
Chandra, C., & Kumar, S. (2000). Supply chain management in theory and practice: A passing fad or a fundamental change? Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(3), 100–113.
Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., Lin, C. T., & Chen, H. C. (2007). An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 52(2), 296–307.
Cheraghi, S. H., Dadashzadeh, M., & Subramanian, M. (2004). Critical Success Factors For Supplier Selection: An Update. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 20(2), 91–108.
Dalvi-Esfahani, M., Niknafs, A., Kuss, D. J., Nilashi, M., & Afrough, S. (2019). Social media addiction: Applying the DEMATEL approach. Telematics and Informatics, 43, 101250.
Demirel, H., ?ener, B., Yildiz, B., & Balin, A. (2020). A real case study on the selection of suitable roll stabilizer type for motor yachts using hybrid fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methodology. Ocean Engineering, 217, 108125.
Falatoonitoosi, E., Leman, Z., Sorooshian, S., & Salimi, M. (2013). Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(13), 3476–3480.
Gharakhani, D. (2012). The Evaluation of Supplier Selection Criteria by Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. Journal of Basic and Application Scientific Research, 2(4), 3215–3224.
Hashmi, N., Jalil, S. A., & Javaid, S. (2021). Carbon footprint based multi-objective supplier selection problem with uncertain parameters and fuzzy linguistic preferences. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2, 20–29.
Helms, M. M., Dibrell, C., & Wright, P. (1997). Competitive strategies and business performance: evidence from the adhesives and sealants industry. Management Decision, 35(9), 689–703.
Hendriks, M. M. W. B., de Boer, J. H., Smilde, A. K., & Doornbos, D. A. (1992). Multicriteria decision making. In Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 201–220.
Kabadayi, N. (2020). An Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Sustainable Suppliers. Alphanumeric Journal, 8(2), 201–226.
Karthikeyan, R., Venkatesan, K. G. S., & Chandrasekar, A. (2017). A Comparison of strength and weakness for analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 116(8), 29–33.
Kilincci, O., & Onal, S. A. (2011). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9656–9664.
Kumar, K. (2018). A Spectrum Handoff Scheme for Optimal Network Selection in NEMO based Cognitive Radio Vehicular Networks: A Cost Function MADM Method based on Grey Theory based Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 125, 275–281.
Li, T., Li, A., & Guo, X. (2020). The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry--A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods. Energy, 212, 118694.
Liou, J. J. H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Comments on “Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(4), 672–695.
Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738.
Maqbool, A., & Khan, N. Z. (2020). Analyzing barriers for implementation of public health and social measures to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 disease using DEMATEL method. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 14(5), 887–892.
Mau-Crimmins, T., De Steiguer, J. E., & Dennis, D. (2005). AHP as a means for improving public participation: A pre-post experiment with university students. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 501–514.
Mohd, A. H., Ramli, N., Nassir, A. A., Hazirah, N., & Bahkri, M. (2020). Analysing Supplier Selection Criteria in Fertigation System Using Fuzzy Dematel Method. Gading Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 42–51.
Nadkarni, R. R., & Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101814.
Najmi, A., & Makui, A. (2010). Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 199–212.
Ngai, E. W. T., & Chan, E. W. C. (2005). Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 29(4), 889–899.
Ortíz, M. A., Cómbita, J. P., La De Hoz, Á. A., De Felice, F., & Petrillo, A. (2016). An integrated approach of AHP-DEMATEL methods applied for the selection of allied hospitals in outpatient service. International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics, 8(2), 87–107.
Park, J., Shin, K., Chang, T. W., & Park, J. (2010). An integrative framework for supplier relationship management. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(4), 495–515.
Patnaik, P. K., Swain, P. T. R., Mishra, S. K., Purohit, A., & Biswas, S. (2020). Composite material selection for structural applications based on AHP-MOORA approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 5659–5663.
Qi, R., Li, S., Qu, L., Sun, L., & Gong, C. (2020). Critical factors to green mining construction in China: A two-step fuzzy DEMATEL analysis of state-owned coal mining enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122852.
Raut, R. D., Bhasin, H. V., & Kamble, S. S. (2011). Evaluation of supplier selection criteria by combination of AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL method. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(4), 359–392.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.
Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications.
Shahraki, A. R., & Paghaleh, M. J. (2011). Ranking the voice of customer with fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy AHP. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(12), 1763–1772.
Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., & Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277–282.
Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., & Ali, S. (2019). Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117655.
Sumrit, D., & Anuntavoranich, P. (2013). Using DEMATEL Method to Analyze the Causal Relations on Technological Innovation Capability Evaluation Factors in Thai Technology-Based Firms. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 4(2), 81–103.
Tashayo, B., Honarbakhsh, A., Akbari, M., & Eftekhari, M. (2020). Land suitability assessment for maize farming using a GIS-AHP method for a semi-arid region, Iran. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 19(5), 332–338.
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.
Velasquez, M., & Hester, T. P. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66.
Xia, X., Govindan, K., & Zhu, Q. (2015). Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87(1), 811–825.
Yasmin, M., Tatoglu, E., Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2020). Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: An integrated MCDM approach. Journal of Business Research, 114, 1–15.
Yazdi, M., Khan, F., Abbassi, R., & Rusli, R. (2020). Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making. Safety Science, 127, 104705.
Zhang, G., & Lu, J. (2009). A linguistic intelligent user guide for method selection in multi-objective decision support systems. Information Sciences, 179(14), 2299–2308.

In-Text Citation: (Rahman et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Rahman, N. D. A., Mersing, E. F., Yazid, N. S. S. M., & Mahad, N. F. (2021). An Integrated Approach of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (AHP-DEMATEL) to Solve the Supplier Selection Problem. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 2279–2299.