The Impact of Implementing the Common European Framework of Reference on Language Education: A Critical Review

Farah Hussan  Sahib; Mahani  Stapa

Since its inception in 2001, the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) has been employed worldwide as an international standard for teaching and learning languages. The framework was established to provide a mutual basis for language proficiency comprising language curriculum, reference materials, and assessments adopted globally. Despite gaining fame in the contemporary teaching and learning arena, the depth of the various dimensions of its impact on language classroom pedagogy at the school level is yet to be explored. Thus, this systematic review is aimed to investigate the implementation of CEFR in schools and its impact on language education. The review methodology involved the identification of the relevant literature, the filtering of articles, and the evaluation of the quality of the articles based on pre-determined criteria. The analysis revealed that teachers and students perceive the CEFR positively. The framework had positive impacts on the students' learning process but had more adverse effects on the teachers. The review identified major themes such as the dynamics of teaching and learning of the language, teachers’ understanding and reception, students’ achievements of learning outcomes, the efficacy of classroom assessments and teachers’ professional development which are critically discussed.

Alih, N. A. C., Abdul Raof, A. H., & Yusof, M. A. (2021). Policy Change Implementation: The Case of the CEFR in Malaysian ESL Classrooms. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(2), 296-317.
Alih, N. A. C., Yusoff, M. A., & Abdul Raof, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ Knowledge and Belief on the CEFR Implementation in Malaysian ESL Classroom. Educational Research (IJMCER), 2(5), 126-134.
Aziz, A. H. A. A., Rashid, R. A., & Zainudin, W. Z. W. (2018). The Enactment of the Malaysian Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR): National Master Trainer’s Reflection. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 409-417.
Byram, M., & Parmenter, L. (Eds.). (2012). The Common European Framework of Reference. The Globalisation of Language Education Policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Çelik, S. (2013). Plurilingualism, Pluriculturalism, and the CEFR: Are Turkey's Foreign Language Objectives Reflected in Classroom Instruction? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1872-1879.
Coste, D. (2007). Contextualising Uses of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Paper presented at Council of Europe Policy Forum on use of the CEFR, Strasbourg, France, 8 February 2007.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2006). Survey on the use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), Synthesis of Results. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
Council of Europe. (2009). Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Learning, Teaching, Assessment. CEFR: A manual. Language Policy Division, Strasbourg.
Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Byram, M. (2019). The current influence of the CEFR in secondary education: teachers’ perceptions. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 1-15.
Don, Z. M. (2020). The CEFR and the production of spoken English: A challenge for teachers. The English Teacher, 49(3), 77-88.
Faez, F., Majhanovich, S., Taylor, S., Smith, M., & Crowley, K. (2011). The power of “Can Do” statements: Teachers’ perceptions of CEFR-informed instruction in French as a second language classrooms in Ontario. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 1-19.
Faez, F., Taylor, S., Majhanovich, S., & Brown, P. (2011). Teacher reactions to CEFR’s task-based approach for FSL classrooms. Synergies Europe, 6, 109-120.
Figueras, N. (2012). The impact of the CEFR. ELT Journal, 66(4), 477–485. Doi:10.1093/elt/ccs037
Foley, J. (2021). CLT using CEFR and EIL in Southeast Asia and East Asia in the English language classroom. RELC Journal, 1-13.
Franz, J., & Teo, A. (2017). “A2 is normal” – Thai secondary school English teachers’ encounters with the CEFR. RELC Journal. 49(3), 1 – 7.
Fulcher, G. (2008). Criteria for evaluating language quality. In E. Shohamy (Ed.), Language testing and assessment. Encyclopaedia of Language and Education, 7, 157-176. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
Hasselgreen, A. (2013). Adapting the CEFR for the Classroom Assessment of Young Learners’ Writing. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(4), 415–
435. Doi:10.3138/cmlr.1705.415
Hayes, D. (2004). Inside INSET: trainers’ perceptions. Trainer development: Principles and practice from language teacher training, 63-79.
Ishak, W. I. W., & Mohamad, M. (2018). The Implementation of Common European Framework of References (CEFR): What Are the Effects Towards LINUS Students’ Achievements? Creative Education, 9, 2714-2731.
Jaakkola, H., Viita-Leskelä, U., Sävy, S., & Komsi, K. (2002). How to promote learning to learn in first foreign language classes in Finland. I Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment; Case Studies, 40-49.
Johar, N. A. I. N., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Teachers’ Perceptions on Using the Pulse 2 Textbook. Journal of Educational Research & Indegenous Studies, 2(1), 1-15
K?r, E., & Sülü, A. (2014). Language teachers’ views on CEFR. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 1(5). 358-364.
Kok, N. M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). English Language Teachers’ Perceptions on the Implementation of CEFR-Aligned Curriculum among Primary Schools in Malaysia. Paper presented at Seminar Wacana Pendidikan 2019 (SWAPEN 2.0)
Krishnan, P. D., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Blended CEFR in Enhancing Vocabulary among Low Proficiency Students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (5). 141- 153. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.11
Lee, N. A. A., & Kassim, A. A. M. (2019). Implementation of CEFR-aligned Assessment Tools in Malaysian ESL Classroom. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 4(2), 7-10.
Lee, O. S., & Park, J. (2020). Understanding L2 Speech Production: Implications for Teaching Speaking in EFL Classroom. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(3), 808-823.
Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching. 39(3): 167–90.
Little, D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. Modern Language Journal, 91, 645–655.
Lo, Y. Y. (2018). English Teachers’ Concern on Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): An Application of CBAM. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik. 6(1), 46 -58.
Mison, S., & Jang, I. C. (2011). Canadian FSL teachers’ assessment practices and needs: Implications for the adoption of the CEFR in a Canadian context. Synergies Europe, 6, 99-108.
Moe, E. (2008). Juggling numbers and opinions: An attempt to set CEFR standards in Norway for a test of reading in English. In Taylor, L., & Weir, C. J. (2008). Multilingualism and Assessment: Achieving transparency, assuring quality, sustaining diversity (pp. 67-78). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Moonen, M., Stoutjesdijk, E., de Graaf, R., & Corda, A. (2013). Implementing CEFR in Secondary education: Impact on FL Teachers’ Educational and Assessment Practice. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 226–246.
Nagai, N., & O’Dwyer, F. (2011). The Actual and Potential Impacts of the CEFR on Language Education in Japan. Synergies Europe, 6, 141–152.
Ng, H. Y., & Ahmad, M. Z. (2021). Secondary school English teachers’ knowledge and practice on CEFR-aligned English curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 36(1), 75–91.
Nguyen, V. H., & Hamid, M. O. (2020): The CEFR as a National Language Policy in Vietnam: Insights from a Sociogenetic Analysis, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1715416.
North, B. (2014). Putting the Common European Framework of Reference to Good Use. Language Teaching, 47(2), 228–249. Doi:10.1017/S0261444811000206.
Oscarson, A. D., & Oscarson, M. (2010). Using the CEFR in the Foreign Language Classroom. Putting the CEFR to Good Use, 83-91.
Piccardo, A. P. E., & North, B. (2019). The action-oriented approach: A dynamic vision of language education. Multilingual Matters.
Rehner, K. (2017). The CEFR in Ontario: Transforming Classroom Practice. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education and Curriculum Services Canada.
Rehner, K., Lasan, I., Popovich, A., & Palta, Z. (2021). The Impact of CEFR-Related Professional Learning on Second-Language Teachers’ Classroom Practice: The Case of French in Canada. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 24(1), 26–53.
Savski, K. (2020). Local Problems and a Global Solution: Examining the Recontextualization Of CEFR in Thai and Malaysian Language Policies. Language Policy, 1-21.
Shin, J. L. K., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). The Attitudes of Pupils towards using Flipgrid in Learning English Speaking Skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3).
Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Lee, J.C. (2018). CEFR-aligned School-Based Assessment in the Malaysian Primary ESL Classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 8(2), 452- 463.
Simons, M., & Colpaert, J. (2015). Judgmental Evaluation of the CEFR by Stakeholders in Language Testing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 10(1), 66-77.
The Star Online. (2018). Let’s have our own textbooks. The Star Education. Kuala Lumpur. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2018/02/04/lets-have-our-own-textbooks/
Uri, N. F. M., & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2018). Implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Teachers’ awareness and the Challenges. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 24(3), 168-183.
Uri, N. F. M., & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2019). Teachers’ evaluation of the suitability of reading syllabus specifications to the CEFR. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 32-44.
Uri, N. F. M., & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2020). The Appropriacy and Applicability of English Assessment Against CEFR Global Scale: Teachers’ Judgment. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 26(3).
Waluyo, B. (2020). Learning Outcomes of a General English Course Implementing Multiple E-Learning Technologies and Active Learning Concepts. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), 160-181.
Yüce, E., & Mirici, I. H. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into the application of 9th grade EFL program in terms of the CEFR. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1171-1187.

In-Text Citation: (Sahib & Stapa, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Sahib, F. H., & Stapa, M. (2021). The Impact of Implementing the Common European Framework of Reference on Language Education: A Critical Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 644 – 660.

Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

The Impact of Implementing the Common European Framework of Reference on Language Education: A Critical Review

Farah Hussan Sahib, Mahani Stapa

Further Information

Our Journals

Get intouch with us