ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Recently, small nearby outdoor spaces have become an important tool to improve academic outcomes by enhancing students' social-learning experience. However, nearby open spaces and pocket parks of Malaysian universities lack the absorption of informal and formal outdoor education that may affect the academic experience, especially in the outdoor spaces. Therefore, there is a need to enhance students' on-campus learning experience in Malaysian universities. This study aimed to investigate the visually preferred pocket parks criteria to promote students' learning experience on Malaysian campus grounds; this is in line with the Twelfth Malaysia Plan for 2021-2025. This study employed a visual-verbal preference survey (VVPS) conducted in three Malaysian universities, including Universiti Malaya (UM), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), to assess the visual preferences of 415 students toward six pocket parks sceneries. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict the relationship between students' outdoor learning experience and preferred pocket parks criteria. The result showed that pocket parks that provide a strong shade, variety in softscape and activities, and bench hardscape contributed to enhancing students' outdoor learning. The result indicated that providing on-campus pocket parks with the preferred design criteria can enhance the learning experience. Thus, the current study contributed to integrating nearby pocket parks in outdoor learning to improve campus urban design and academic experience. The study's findings are of great importance for policymakers and academic administration, landscape and urban planners, and researchers in the field in creating an academically responsive campus.
Abd El-Aziz, N. A. (2017). Pocket Park Design in Informal Settlements in Cairo City, Egypt. Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, 2(2), 51–60. http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=241&paperId=10020954
Akhir, N. M., Sakip, S. R., Abbas, M. Y., & Othman, N. (2018). Landscape Spatial Character: Students' preferences on outdoor campus spaces, Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 13(13), 89–97. doi:10.21834/ajqol.v3i13.165
Ali, S. M., Rostam, K., & Awang, A. H. (2014). School Landscape Environments in Assisting the Learning Process and in Appreciating the Natural Environment. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.222
Barnett, W. S. (2011). Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention. Science, 333(6045), 975–978. doi:10.1126/science.1204528
Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Han, B., Derose, K. P., Golinelli, D., & McKenzie, T. L. (2014). The Potential for Pocket Parks to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(3), 9–26. doi:10.4278/ajhp.130430-quan-213
Currie, M. A. (2016). A design framework for small parks in ultra-urban, metropolitan, suburban and small town settings. Urban Design, 22(1), 76–95. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1234334
Da Wan, C., Sirat, M., & Razak, D. (2015). The Idea of a University: Rethinking the Malaysian Context. Humanities, 4(3), 266–282. doi:10.3390/h4030266
De Vaus, D. (2013). Surveys in Social Research (6th ed). Routledge.
Dugdale, S. (2009). Space Strategies for the New Learning Landscape. Educause Review, 44 (2), pp. 51-63. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2009/3/space-strategies-for-the-new-learning-landscape
Economic Planning Unit. (2016). The Eleventh Malaysia Plan, 2016-2020. Putrajaya: Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia. https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/node/2508
Gibson, H., & Canfield, J. (2016). Pocket parks as community building blocks: A focus on Stapleton, CO. Community Development, 47(5), 732–745. doi:10.1080/15575330.2016.1220965
Hafner, K., Zasada, I., Zanten, B., T., Ungaro, F., Koetse, M., & Piorr, A. (2018). Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Märkische Schweiz, Germany. Landscape Research. 43(6), 846–861. doi: org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289
Hecke, L. V., Ghekiere, A., Cauwenberg, J., Veitch, J., Bourdeaudhuij, I., Dyck, D., Clarys, P., Weghe, N., & Deforche, B. (2018). Park characteristics preferred for adolescent park visitation and physical activity: A choice-based conjoint analysis using manipulated photographs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 144–155. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.017
Hedges, H. (2018). The "fullness of life": Learner interests and educational experiences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.005
Ibrahim, N., & Fadzil, N. H. (2013). Informal Setting for Learning on Campus: Usage and preference. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 344–351. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.036
Ibrahim, N., Fadzil, N., H. and Saruwono, M. (2013). Learning outside Classrooms on-Campus Ground: Malaysia. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 4(13), 97–109. doi:10.21834/ajbes.v3i9.68
Kaboudarahangi, M., Tahir, O., Shariff, M., & Maulan, S. (2013). Factors influencing preferences of garden iconographies. Social Science and Humanities, 21(4), 1395–1409. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/39801
Keppell, M., Souter, K., & Riddle, M. (2012). Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education: Concepts for the Modern Learning Environment (1st ed). IGI Global.
Kim, Y. L., & Lee, S. M. (2015). Effect of Satisfaction in Major at University on Academic Achievement among Physical Therapy Students. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(2), 405–409. doi:10.1589/jpts.27.405
Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (1st ed). SAGE Publications.
Lau, S. S., Lin, P., & Qin, H. (2012). A preliminary study on environmental performances of pocket parks in high-rise and high-density urban context in Hong Kong. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 7, 215–225. doi:10.1093/ijlct/cts033
Lorenzo, E., Corraliza, J.A., Collado, S., Sevillano, V., 2016. Preference, restorativeness and perceived environmental quality of small urban spaces. Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7(2), 152–177. doi:/10.1080/21711976.2016.1149985
Mertens, L., Van Cauwenberg, J., Veitch, J., Deforche, B., & Van Dyck, D. (2019). Differences in park characteristic preferences for visitation and physical activity among adolescents: A latent class analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0212920. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212920
Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2011). Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003
Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225–235. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
Nordh, H., & Østby, K. (2013). Pocket parks for people: A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 12, 12–17. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.003
Peschardt, K. K & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2014). Evidence for Designing Health Promoting Pocket Parks. ArchNet - IJAR, 8(3), 149–164. doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i3.341
Peschardt, K. K., Stigsdotter, U. K., & Schipperrijn, J. (2014). Identifying Features of Pocket Parks that May Be Related to Health Promoting Use. Landscape Research Journal, 41(1), 79–94. doi:10.1080/01426397.2014.894006
Peschardt, K. K., Schipperijn, J., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2012). Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 235–244. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002
Polat, A. T., & Akay, A. (2015). Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation area users and various landscape design elements. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 573–582. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.009
Rasli, F. N., Kanniah, K. D., & Ho, C. S. (2019). Analysis of Fragmented Green Spaces in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 72, 457-462. doi:org/10.3303/CET1972077
Rea, T. (2009). Informal learning outdoors. In S. Gibson & J. Haynes (Eds.), Perspectives on Participation and Inclusion: Engaging Education (pp. 122–131). Continuum International.
Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. (2017a). Criteria for Public Open Space Enhancement to Achieve Social Interaction: a Review Paper. Materials Science and Engineering, 291, 012001. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/291/1/012001
Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. (2017b). Means to Achieve Social Interaction in Green Open Space in Baghdad, Iraq. Built Environment, Technology and Engineering, 2, 159–167. doi: psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/62365
Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. (2018a). Green Open Spaces Criteria to Achieve Social Interaction of Karkh Community in the City Baghdad, Iraq. Materials Science and Engineering, 401, 012029. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/401/1/012029
Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. (2018b). Determining the Factors Affecting Social Interaction in the Parks of Baghdad City, Iraq. Archnet-IJAR, 12(3), 40–52. doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1658
Salih, S. A., Ismail, S., Ismail, N. A. (2019). Pocket Parks for Enhancing Residents' Social Interaction in the City of Baghdad, Iraq. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 8(1.9), 611-616. doi:10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.30071
Salih, S. A., Ismail, S., & Mseer, A. (2020). Pocket parks for promoting social interaction among residents of Baghdad City. Archnet-IJAR, 14(3), 393–408. doi:10.1108/arch-11-2019-0261
Shahhosseini, H., Kamal, M., Maulan, S. (2015). Visual preferences of small urban parks based on spatial configuration of place. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning. 25(2), 84–93. http://ijaup.iust.ac.ir/article-1-247-en.html
Sheriff, N., M. & Abdullah, N. (2017). Research Universities in Malaysia: What Beholds? Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 35–50. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207763
Tabassum, S. (2018). Environmental Response of Small Urban Parks in Context of Dhaka City. Journal of Physics, 953(1), 1–19. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012038
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18–27. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3205035
Tahir, M. M., Abdullah, N. A., Usman, I. M., Che, A. I., Mohd, N. F., & Surat, M. (2009). Constructing place and space in the design of learning environments for PBL in Malaysian universities. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 26–34. https://ejournal.ukm.my/ajtlhe/article/view/10459
Towers, D., & Lynch, J. (2017). What kind of outdoor educator do you want to become? Trying something different in outdoor studies in higher education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 21, 117–121. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2017.09.002
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (3rd ed). Harper and Rao.
Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2011). Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.006
In-Text Citation: (Salih et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Salih, S. A., Ismail, S., & Ismail, N. A. (2021). On-Campus Pocket Parks for Enhancing Outdoor Learning Experience in Malaysian Universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(10), 831–846.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode