ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The Covid-19 pandemic has forced classrooms to shift from face-to -face to fully online learning. This requires a great adjustment for teachers and students. There have been comparisons between the two modes and discussions on which one being “better” and face-to-face is generally preferred by both teachers and learners. Before deciding to choose one over the other, we need to understand the advantages and disadvantages of both from the experience of teachers and learners. Therefore, a study was conducted on 71 students taking English courses and about 20 English teachers from Sultan Azlan Shah University. The study found that online classes are more advantageous in convenience, flexibility, availability of teaching and learning resources, economy of time and cost. The responses given by most of the students also show that the switch to online mode has not affected their learning. They were able to absorb their lessons and acquire the skills taught just as well. However, responses from teachers, be they from surveys or qualitative inquiries, found that online classes have limitations in interaction, collaboration, communication and learner discipline among others. Therefore it is necessary to find ways to make learner discipline, interaction, collaboration and communication effective to fully develop the potential of online learning success. It can be concluded that blended learning would be the most ideal since it is a loss to choose one mode over the other. Blended learning has already been implemented in several universities in Malaysia and the rest of the universities can consider following suit.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (Eds.). (2013). Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research, and practice. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Blake, R. J. (2009). The use of technology for second language distance learning. Modern Language Journal, 93, 822-835.
Bourelle, A., Bourelle, T., Knutson, A. V., & Spong, S. (2016). Sites of multimodal literacy: Comparing student learning in online and face-to-face environments. Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, 39, 55-70. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.003
Azizan, F. Z. (2012). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157- 172. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105
Heppen, J., Sorensen, N., Allensworth, E., Walters, K., Rickles, J., Taylor, S., & Michelman, V. (2017). The struggle to pass algebra: Online vs. face-to-face credit recovery for at-risk urban students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 272-296.
Hocly, N. (2015). Developments in online language learning. ELT Journal, 69(3), 2-6. 2015http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/
Mehrotra, C., & McGahey, L. (2012). Online teaching. In B. Schwartz & R. A. R. Gurung (Eds.), Evidence-based teaching for higher education (pp. 59-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Montiel-Chamorro, M. L. (2018). Comparing online English language learning and face-to-Face English language learning.(Masters thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia, United States). Retrieved from
https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article
Ni, A. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199-215.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers and Education, 59(3), 893- 906
Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., & Avgerinou, M. D. (2013). The effects of technology on the Community of Inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 48-57
Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 41(2), 137-147.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID?19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behaviour and Emerging Technologies, 2(2),113-115
In-Text Citation: (Mohideen, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Mohideen, S. binti H. (2021). The Perspectives of Online English Language Teaching and Learning during the Pandemic. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(10), 903 – 921.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode