Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Relationship between Beliefs Underlying Attitude, Subjective Norm, Perceived Behavior Control and Cyberbullying Intention of Adolescents Among Secondary School Students in Selangor, Malaysia

Zainal Madon, Yap Hon Chin

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11654

Open access

Empirical research has recognized attitude towards cyberbullying, perceived norms, and risk perception as correlates of cyberbullying in adolescents. Moreover, study on relationships between attitudes, subjective norm, and perceive behavioral control, and cyberbullying are still at early stage especially among middle hood adolescents in Malaysia. Using the theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study investigated the linkages amongst beliefs underlying attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavior control and cyberbullying intention of adolescents which aims to contribute to the research field on cyberbullying. In total 1463 secondary school students at age 16, from 10 secondary schools across six districts in Selangor, Malaysia participated in the study, which using Attitude towards Cyberbullying Scale, Subjective Norm Scale, Perceived Behavioral Control Scale, and Intentions towards Cyberbullying Scale. Results showed that beliefs underlying attitude towards cyberbullying, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control are significantly correlated to cyberbullying intention. However, there was no significant relationship between Information Communication Technologies (ICT) knowledge with cyberbullying intention. The findings may be useful in designing various prevention and intervention programs that aim at teaching adolescents ways to resist negative social pressure, change group norms when they are favoring cyberbullying as well as reducing the perceived acceptability of cyberbullying.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179- 211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27- 58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self- efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665- 683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816. 2002.tb00236.x
Ang, R. P. (2015). Adolescent cyberbullying: A review characteristics, prevention and intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25(Part A), 35- 42. doi:10.1016/. j/avb.2015.07.011
Ang, R. P., Huan, V. S., & Florell. D. (2013). Understanding the relationship between proacitive and reactive aggression, and cyberbullying across United States and Singapore adolescents’ samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(2), 237- 254. doi:10.1177/0886260513505149
Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253- 261. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0016
Bakar, H. S. A. (2014). The emergence themes of cyberbullying among adolescences. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(4), 393- 406.
doi:10.1080/02673843.2014.992027
Balakrishnan, V., & Norman, A. –A. (2020). Psychological motives of cyberbullying among Malaysian young adults. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 30(3), 1-14
Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. American Psychological Association, 1(2), 123- 135. doi:10.1037/a0028113
Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Association among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350.
Bonanno, R. A., & Hymel, S. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 685-697. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1
Bosworth, K., Espelage, D. L., & Simon, T. (1999). Factors associated with bullying behavior among early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(3), 341- 362. Doi:10.1177/0272431699019003003
Calvete, E., Orue, I. Est?vez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128- 1135. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2017). Adversity in university: Cyberbullying and its impacts on students, faculty and administrators. Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 888. doi:10.3390/ijerph14080888
Chua, A. F., Joanna, K. H. T., Subramanian, R., Zaman, K. W., Krishnan, S., Lokothasan, K. (2020). The correlation between aggression, self- esteem and cyberbullying among undergraduates in Malaysia. Sains Insani, 5(1), 205-211.
CyberSecurity Malaysa. (2013). Internet safety for school children. Retrieved from https://www.cybersecurity.my/en/knowledge_bank/news/2013/main/detail/2345/index.html
Doane, A. N., Pearson, M. R., & Kelly, M. L. (2014). Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 154- 162. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.051
Elledge, L. C., Williford, A., Boulton, A. J., DePaolis, K. J., Little, T. D., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Individual and contextual predictors of cyberbullying: The influence of children’s provictim attitudes and teachers’ ability to intervene. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 698–710. doi:10.1007/s106964-013-9920
Faucher, C., Jackson, M., & Cassidy, W. (2014). Cyberbullying among university students: Gendered experiences, impacts and perspectives. Education Research International, 2014, 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2014/698545
Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365- 383.
Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2013). Peer influence, internet use and cyberbullying: A comparison of different context effects among Germen adolescent. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 1-17.
Fiske, S., & Morling, B. (1996). Stereotyping as a function of personal control motives and capacity constraints: The odd couple of power and anxiety. In R. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 322–346). New York: Guilford.
Fleming, M., & Towey, K. (2002). Educational forum on adolescent health: Youth bullying. Chicago: American Medical Association.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGRAW Hil
Hierman, W., & Walrave, M. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24(4), 614-620.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. New York, NY: Corwin press.
Jafarkarimi, H., Saadatdoost, R., Alex, T. H. S., & Jee. H. M. (2017). Determinant factors of cyberbullying: An application of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(23), 6472- 6482. doi:10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002521
König, A., Gollwitzer, M., Steffgen, G. (2010). Cyberbullying as an act of revenge? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 210-224. doi:10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22–S30. doi:10.1016/j/jadohealth.2007.08.017
Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., & Gagne´, M. H. (2012). Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.201111.013
Lee, Y. C., & Wu, W. L. (2018). Factors in cyber bullying: the attitude- social influence- efficacy model. Anales de Psicologia, 34(2), 324-331. doi:10.6018/analesps.34.2.295411
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1-14.
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadlla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bully behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthpsychiaty, 80, 362-374.
Musharraf, S., Bauman, S., Anis- ul- Haque, M., Malik, J. A. (2019). General and ICT self- efficacy in different participants roles in cyberbullying/ victimization among Pakistani university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (1098), 1-11.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01098
Musharraf, S., & Lewis, C. A. (2018). Bullying, cyber bullying and suicide: A crisis on campus? Journal of Pakistan Psychiatric Society, 15(1), 39-41.
Noh, C. H. C., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2014). Kajian penerokaan buli siber dalam kalangan pelajar UMT. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 134(2014), 323- 329. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.255
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA; Blackwell Publishers.
Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2014). Using the theory of planned behavior to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 463- 477.
doi:10.1080/17405629.2013/858626
Peker, A. (2015). Analyzing the risk factors predicting the cyberbullying status of secondary school students. Education and Science, 40(181), 57-75. doi:10.15390/EB.2015.4412
Perren, S., & Gutzwiller- Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Development Psychology, 9, 195- 209.
Piccoli, V., Carnaghi, A., Grassi, M., Straga, M., & Bianchi, M. (2020). Cyberbullying through the lens of social influence: Predicting cyberbullying perpetration from perceived peer- norm, cyberspace regulations and ingroup processes. Computer in Human Behavior, 102(2020), 260-273.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectation. Aggression Behavior, 36, 81-94.
Prinstien, T., J., Brechwald, W. A., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). Susceptibility to peer influence: Using a performance- based measure to identify adolescent males at heightened risk for deviant peer socialization. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1167-1172. doi: http://dx/doi.org.ezproxy.uvm.edu/10.1037/a0023274
Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Development Psychology, 43(3), 564- 575. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564
Sampasa- Kanyinga, H., Roumeliotis, P., & Xu. H. (2014). Associations between cyberbullying and school bullying victimization and suicidal ideation, plans and attempts among Canadian schools’ children. Plis One, 9(7), e102145. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0102145
Savage, M. W., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2017). Moving toward a theory: testing an integrated model of cyberbullying perpetration, aggression, social skills, and internet self- efficacy. Computer in Human Behavior, 71, 353- 361. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.016
Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., & Samara, M. (2016). Cultural issues in bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents: Methodological approaches for comparative research. International Journal of Developmental Science, 10(2016), 3-8. doi:10.3233/Dev-16000085
Sivabalan, T. V., Zaki, R. A., Choo. W. Y. (2020). The prevalence of cyberbullying and its associated factors among young adolescents in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Health and Translational Medicine, 23(Suppl 1). 202- 211.
Smith, P. K. (2012). Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In A. B. N. S. R. Jimerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 93–103). New York: Routledge.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett. N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376- 385. doi:10.111/j.1469-7610.2007. 01846.x
Song, M., Zhu, Z., Liu, S., Fan, H., Zhu, T., & Zhang, L. (2019). Effects of aggressive traits on cybervullying: Mediated moderation or moderated? Computers in Human Behavior, 97(1), 167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.015
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Development Psychology, 43(6), 1531- 1543. doi: http://dx.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531
Suriyabandara, V. (2017). An analysis of the attitude towards cyberbullying and cyber victimization among the university students of Sri Lanka. World Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 18- 31. doi:10.5430/wjss. v4n2p18.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
Wade, A., & Beran, T. (2011). Cyberbullying: The new era of bullying. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 44-61.
Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of Internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S14–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohelath.2007.08.018
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y., (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 662-674. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3
Yuen, M., Lim, M. K., & Say, C. (2018, March 13). “Out teens are bullies”. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/18/behaving-badly-in-cyberspace-malaysian-teens-more-likely-to-be-cyberbullies-than-victims-says-study

In-Text Citation: (Madon & Chin, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Madon, Z., & Chin, Y. H. (2021). Relationship between Beliefs Underlying Attitude, Subjective Norm, Perceived Behavior Control and Cyberbullying Intention of Adolescents Among Secondary School Students in Selangor, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 1691–1705.