ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Many models have been built on productive innovation measures. However, each model has certain advantages and disadvantages. In the field of education, Jannsen's productive innovation measures are widely accepted. Therefore, the Jannsen productive innovation measure is used as the framework of the study. This study was conducted to explore the steps taken by innovative Islamic Education teachers in Malaysia when producing teaching innovations. The study was conducted qualitatively. Eight study participants were selected based on purposive sampling techniques. The search for study participants was made using the snowball method. Data were collected using interviews and document analysis. Interviews were conducted in a semi-structured approach. The findings of the study form nine main themes, namely; 1) identify problems, 2) identify student interests, 3) identify teacher tendencies, 4) collaborate, 5) develop innovations, 6) test effectiveness, 7) get suggestions for improvement, 8) spread the word, and 9) get feedback. These findings form the Model of Teaching Innovation Production Rotation.
al-Quran al-Karim.
Abdullah, W. A. A. W., Razak, K. A., Hamzah, M. I., & Zhaffar, N. M. (2020). Pengetahuan Untuk Menghasilkan Inovasi Pengajaran dalam Kalangan Guru Inovatif Pendidikan Islam. Asian People Journal, 3(2), 192–201.
Ahmad, S. F., & Tamuri, A. H. (2010). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Penggunaan Bahan Bantu Mengajar Berasaskan Teknologi Multimedia dalam Pengajaran j-QAF. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 2(2), 53–64.
Amabile, T. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
Angevine, C., Cator, K., Liberman, B., Smith, K., & Young, V. (2019). Designing a Process for Inclusive Innovation: A Radical Commitment to Equity.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research for Education. Singapore: Allyn and Bacon.
Chiemeka-unogu, C. M. (2018). Planned Educational Change and Innovation Process in Nigeria: Evaluation of Universal Basic Education. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 11(1), 71–89.
Dilobarkhon, K. (2019). The importance of modern innovation in education. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 7(12), 659–661.
Hashim, H., Saharani, M., Zulkifli, N., Mokhtar, M. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Conception of Innovative Teaching Methodologies among Lecturers at Selected Polytechnics in Malaysia. Creative Education, 10(05), 874–881. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.105065
Hussin, N. H. (2015). Pengajaran Ibadat dalam Kalangan Guru Cemerlang Pendidikan Islam. Tesis PhD. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647210
Jima’ain, M. T. A., Hassan, F. N. A., Razak, K. A., Hehsan, A., & Junaidi, J. (2020). The emerging challenges of industrial revolution 4.0: A students’ perspective. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 1215–1225.
Kassim, A. Y. & Tamuri, A. H. (2010). Pengetahuan Pedagogikal Kandungan (PPK) Pengajaran Akidah: Kajian Kes Guru Cemerlang Pendidikan Islam. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 2(2), 13–30.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Do People Recognize The Four Cs? Examining Layperson Conceptions Of Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033295
Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Figural or Verbal?: Which One Should We Use?? Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 4(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015
Langgulung, H. (1991). Kreativitas dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Husna.
Lednor, P. W. (2019). How to be Innovative. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Mathe, H. (2016). Living Innovation: Competing in the 21st Century Access Economy. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Reearch. Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiental Perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
Redding, S., Twyman, J., & Murphy, M. (2013). What is an Innovation in Learning? In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on Innovations in Learning (pp. 3–14). Philadelphia: Temple University.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (Third Edit). New York: The Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.4750170109
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation In Education: What Works, What Doesn’t , And What To Do About It? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
Sola, E., Hoekstra, R., Fiore, S., & Mccauley, P. (2017). An Investigation of the State of Creativity and Critical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates. Creative Education, 8, 1495–1522. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.89105
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior: A Literature Review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
Tikly, L., & Milligan, L. (2017). Learning from Innovation for Education in Rwanda (No. 04).
Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). Different Stages of Innovation Process. Procedia Technology, 1, 574–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.125
Tukimin, R., Yusoff, N. M. R. N., & Baharudin, H. (2021). Source of Ideas of Teacher-Generated Innovation in Teaching Arabic Language in Primary Schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development, 9(2), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i2/8893
Tukimin, R., Yusoff, N. M. R. N., Baharudin, H., & Hussain, F. (2018). Innovative Arabic Language Teacher: A Dream or A Hope. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development, 7(4), 158–165.
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i4/4844
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Zhaffar, N. M., Abdullah, W. A. A. W., Hamzah, M. I., Razak, K. A., & Lubis, M. A. (2018). Strategi Penyoalan Guru Pendidikan Islam Dalam Pengajaran Berfikir Kritis. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (ACER-J), 2(January), 72–87.
In-Text Citation: (Abdullah et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Abdullah, W. A. A. W., Razak, K. A., & Hamzah, M. I. (2021). Formation of Teaching Innovation Production Cycle Model based on the Practice of Innovative Teachers of Islamic Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 1366–1378.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode