ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study was conducted to build a conceptual framework for evaluating diploma programs in automotive technology in vocational colleges in Malaysia. The researcher used a conceptual framework based on the study's theoretical framework, which focused on the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation model of Stufflebeam (1971). The findings indicate that this conceptual framework is suitable for use in this study at the next stage and can be adapted by other researchers.
Abu Hassan, M. A., Gengatharan, K., Ramli, R., & Mukhter, M. S. (2021). Issues of Teacher Professionalism in The Era of the COVID-19. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(8), 1117-1123.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018) Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206
Che Amat, M. F., & Abdul Hakeem, A. J. (2013). Menilai Keberkesanan Pelaksanaan Program Diploma Perguruan Lepas Ijazah Pendidikan Sejarah Sekolah Rendah di Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Pulau Pinang. Seminar Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Geografi 2013, 215–225.
Darling, H. L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievment: a review of state policy evidence . Journal of Education, 8 (1), 50-101.
Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., and Novak, J. (2000). Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, San Diego: Academic Press
Puteh, N. S., & Meerah, M. S. (2007.). Cabaran dan Isu dalam Perancangan dan Pembangunan Kurikulum Persekolahan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2009) Curriculum Design. In Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues (5th Ed.), pp. 181-206. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Sharifah & Subahan. (2007). Cabaran dan Isu dalam Perancangan dan Pembangunan Kurikulum Persekolahan di Malaysia.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: a self-instruction guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19-25.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for program evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
In-Text Citation: (Mukhter et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Mukhter, M. S., Yunus, J. @ N., & Yuet, F. K. C. (2022). Conceptual Framework for Evaluation of Diploma Program in Automotive Technology in Vocational Colleges in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1), 1904–1910.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode