ISSN: 2226-3624
Open access
Some scholarly works do not consider the German School, often called the German Historical School, as its own school of economics. Contrary to this view, this paper answers this question, and argues, through comparisons and contrasts with other schools of thought, that it was, and is, its own bounded school with lasting influences, but was derived from timely culture. Unique for economics, which usually prefers mathematical techniques, it placed less methodological stress upon theory and more upon historical analysis. It struggled between deduction and induction, but viewed society biologically like an organism, with concern for the development of societies and societal issues, popular in today’s economics. Through the works of such brilliant minds as Friedrich List, Gustav von Schmoller, and Wilhelm Roscher, this paper traces the German School’s influence from its origins in the mercantilist period up to the Freiburg School and ordo-liberals. Relying on qualitative foundations, it shows that these economists were their own bounded school, theorizing not with mathematical theory but qualitatively. They have had lasting influences, including through the development of neoclassical economics, modern sociology, and economic changes brought on by German unification, the two world wars, and particularly the development of the European integration process.
Afleitch, Peter (moderator) (2011, June 19). “‘Ordo-Liberalism’ Trumps Keynesianism:
Economic Policy in the Federal Republic.” uselectionatlas.org.
Andreosso-O’Callaghan, Bernadette and Francoise Nicolas (2007, August). “Are the economies
of ASEAN and EU complementary?”
Anonymous, Keith (2013, July 4). “Third Reich Tour.” Munich City Tours.
Beauman, Ned (2013, July 18). “Werner Sombart: Portrait of an Anti-Semite.” Retrieved from
My Jewish Learning.
Caldwell, Bruce J. (2001, Fall). “There Really Was a German Historical School of Economics:
A Comment on Heath Pearson.” History of Political Economy. Volume 33, Number 3, pp. 649-654.
Daastol, Arno Mong (2006). “Friedrich List (1789-1846).” University of Maastricht.
Dullien, Sebastian (2008, January 20). “The transatlantic divide: How fiscal policy debates
differ.” EconoMonitor.
Eichengreen, Barry (2013, July 22). “European Economic Community.” Retrieved from Library
of Economics and Liberty.
Feasel, Kevin (2008, July 2). “The Freiburg School of Economics.” 36 Chambers- The
Legendary Journeys: Execution to the max!
Friedman, George (2011, September 13). “The Crisis of Europe and European Nationalism.”
Geopolitical Wekkl.
Fukuyama, Francis (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstruction of
Social Order. New York, NY; Simon and Schuster.
Fullerton, Ronald A (2008, Spring). “A prophet of modern advertising: Germany’s Karl Knies.”
Journal Of Advertising.
Germany’s Strong Economic Growth After 1871. (2013, June 25). Retrieved from
123helpme!.com.
Grimmer-Solem, Erik and Roberto Romani (1999). “The Historical School, 1870-1900. A
Cross- National Reassessment.” History of European Ideas. Vol. 24, Nos.4-5. pp. 267-
299.
Hageluken, Alexander (2009, April). “Old school is best.” German Times.
Hayek, F.A. (2007). The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, The Definitive Edition.
University of Chicago Press; Routledge.
Herbst, Jurgen (1965). The German Historical School in American Scholarship; A Study in the
Transfer of Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Historical School of Economics. (2013, June 26). Retrieved from English.turkcebilgi.
com/Historical+school+of+economics.
Krabbe, Jacob Jan (1996). Historicism and Organicism in Economics: The Evolution of
Thought. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Laidler, David E. and George W. Stadler (2013, July 17). “Monetary Explanations of the
Weimar Republic’s Hyperinflation: Some Neglected Contributions in Contemporary
German Literature.” Retrieved from Journal of Money, Credit and Banking.
List, Friedrich (1966). The National System of Political Economy. New York, NY: Augustus M.
Kelley Publishers.
Ludwig Maximilian University Discussion. (2013, July 1). Munich, Germany.
Maes, Ivo (2009, May 14). “Economic thought at the European commission and the creation of EMU (1957-1991).” Speinza Universita di Roma. Working Papers. No. 2.
Michaelides, Panayotis G. and John G. Milios (2008, November 18). “Joseph Schumpeter and
the German Historical School.” Cambridge Journal of Economics. 33, 495-516.
Nau, Heino Heinrich and Philippe Steiner (2002). “Schmoller, Durkheim, and Old European
institutionalist economics.” Journal of Economic Issues. December.
Norman, Peter, and Wolfgang Munchau (1998, February 9). “Postponement: German economics professors call for delay of EMU.” Financial Times.
Pearson, Heath (1999). “Was There Really a German Historical School of Economics?” History of Political Economy.
Peet, Richard and Elaine Hartwick (2009). Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments,
Alternatives. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Pressman, Steve (2014). Fifty Major Economists- Third Edition. New York, NY; Routledge.
Riha, Tomas J (1997, June). “Historicism and Organicism in Economics: The Evolution of
Thought.” International Journal of Social Economics. 24.6.
Roscher, Wilhelm (1972). Principles of Political Economy. New York, NY: Arno Press.
Samuels, Warren J (1990, Fall). “Nationalokonomie.” Review of Social Economy.
Schmoller, Gustav von (1967). The Mercantile System and its Historical Significance. New
York, NY: A.M. Kelley.
Screpanti, Ernesto and Stefano Zamagni (1995). An Outline of the History of Economic
Thought. New York, NY: Oxford University press.
Seidenader pharmaceutical firm discussion. (2013, July 4). Munich, Germany.
Seliger, Bernhard (2013, Fall). “From the ‘Wirtschaftswunder’ (economic miracle) to the
‘German disease’- Economics problems and prospects in post-unification Germany.”
Retrieved from Hanns Seidel Foundation, Seoul.
Senn, Peter R (2005). “The German historical schools in the history of economic thought.”
Emerald Group Publishing Journal of Economic Studies. September.
Shionoya, Yuichi (2005). The Soul of the German Historical School: Methodological Essays on
Schmoller, Weber, and Schumpeter. New York, NY: Springer Science.
Singling out the market; Charlemagne. (2007, Feb. 24). The Economist (US).
Sombart, Werner (Social Science). (2013, July 18). Retrieved from What-when-how.com.
Stolyarov II, G. (2007). “An Analysis of the Views of the German Historical School and the
Austrian School on the Use of Theory and History in Economics.” voices.yahoo.com/
an-analysis-views-german-historical-329642.html May 9.
The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics. (2007, September 1). Retrieved
from Mises Daily.
Tribe, Keith1 (1988). Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse,
1750- 1840. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Vanberg, Viktor J. (2011, April). “The Freiburg School: Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism.”
Institut fur Allgemeine Wirtschaftsforschung.
Watkins, Thayer 1. (2013, Summer). “The Economic History of Germany.” San Jose State
University Department of Economics. Retrieved from www.sjsu.edu/facutly/
watkins/germany.htm.
Wegner, Manfred (1989). “Chapter 14- The European Economic Community.” The Role of the Economist in Government: An International Perspective. Joseph A. Pechman (ed.). New York, NY: The Brookings Institution.
Wilhelm Roscher on means of promoting population increase. (2006, September). Retrieved
from “The Population Council, Inc.”
Wolf, Nikolaus (2008, May). “European economic integration: Undoing 1914-1945.” Vox. 29.
Xirorchakis, Charis (2013, July 9). “European Union Economic and Social Committee
Discussion.” Brussels, Belgium.
Younkins, Edward W. (2004, March 6). “Carl Menger and the German Historical School.” Le
Quebecois Libre. Montreal.
*Note: Some of the page references of the citations, such as for Internet articles, are for how they are printed in HTML, and may not be consistent with others.
(Barry, 2014)
Barry, T. J. (2014). The Germination of German Economics: A Bounded School through European Integration, Which Theorized Without Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(6), 84–105.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode