ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Invigilation of examination is one of the important elements in examination management systems. Satisfying the duties assigned to all invigilators is not easy and requires a thorough and tedious process of assigning the invigilation duties to each invigilator. Once the duties are appointed, the tendency to change the invigilation among invigilators are still possible. The Design Thinking (DT) methods, which comprises five (5) important phases, have been applied and the determination of users’ requirements among invigilators and stakeholders of the system was performed during the empathise phase in the Design Thinking. The users’ or functional requirements collected through the informal telephone conversation from the invigilators were scrutinised and arranged on the empathy map. The House of Quality (HOQ) model was constructed to show the strength of the relationship between the list of functional requirements and the users’ dreams. Based on the model of HOQ, a web-based named Examination Invigilation Systems (ExIMS) was developed to fulfil and consider the users’ requirements as proposed by the invigilators. The implementation of ExIMS has shown a positive impact among invigilators since it comprehensively facilitated the process of invigilation exchange among invigilators. Indirectly, it increased the satisfaction among invigilators and strengthened the integrity of examination procedures.
Ahmed, A., Sajid, A., Ali, M., & Bukhari, A. H. S. (2011). Particle Swarm Optimization Based Hyper-Heuristic For Tackling Real World Examinations Scheduling Problem. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 1406–1413.
Avinash, B. R., Vijaykumar, D. V., Rajeev, M. P., & Parkar, V. V. (2015). Automated Examination Support System. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 2277 – 4106.
Othman, J., Abdullah, S. S. S., Zahari, M. F., Hamat, M., Samsudin, N., Mazeni, N. A., & Rosly, W. N. S. W. M. (2022). Determining Users’ Requirements Through Design Thinking Methodology for Developing Examination Invigilation Management Systems (EXIMS). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(5), 304 – 318.
Carter, M. W., & Laporte, G. (1997). Recent developments in practical course timetabling. In International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (pp. 3–19). Springer.
Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2021). 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process, Interaction-Design. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
Dasho, K. T. (2017) “Design Thinking The GuideBook”. Royal Civil Service Commission.
https://pdfroom.com/books/design-thinking-guide-book/JzydDovy514.
Dharshini, S. P., & Sudha, M. S. (2018). Exam Cell Automation System. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing (IJESC), 7(3).
Gaspero, D. L., Schaerf, A., Cadoli, M., Slany, W., & Falaschi, M. (2003). Local Search Techniques for Scheduling Problems: Algorithms and Software Tool. Forum.
HEA. (2019). “Minute Meeting of Examination Committee”, Department of Academic Affairs, UiTM Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Number 2/2019.
Jamaludin, R., McKay, E., & Ledger, S. (2020). Are we ready for Education 4.0 within ASEAN higher education institutions? Thriving for knowledge, industry and humanity in a dynamic higher education ecosystem? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 1161-1173.
Janssen, K. (2016). "GE Healthcare moving headquarters to Chicago from U.K." Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2017-06-15.
Kahar, M. N. M., & Kendall, G. (2010). The examination timetabling problem at Universiti Malaysia Pahang: Comparison of a constructive heuristic with an existing software solution. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 557–565.
Maguire, M. C., & Bevan, N. (2002). User Requirements Analysis: A Review of Supporting Methods. Usability: Gaining a Competitive Edge IFIP World Computer Congress, Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 133-148.
Mayka, K. (2014). Design Thinking Examples: Five Real Stories. https://www.eleken.co/blog-posts/design-thinking-examples-five-real-stories
Mohamed, A. S., Mushi, A. R., & Mujuni, E. (2013). An Examination Scheduling Algorithm Using Graph Coloring–the case of Sokoine University of Agriculture.
Namdarian, S. (2017). 6 Companies that have successfully applied Design Thinking. https://www.collectivecampus.io/blog/6-companies-that-have-successfully-applied-design-thinking
Noh, S. C., & Karim, A. M. A. (2021). Design thinking mindset to enhance education 4.0 competitiveness in Malaysia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 494-501.
Othman, J., Kadar, R., Abdul Wahab, N., & Warris, S. N. (2018). Examination Management Systems: A Survey of User Acceptance Level in UiTM Cawangan Pulau Pinang. Journal of Computing Research & Innovation (JCRINN), 3(1), 46-54.
Praveen, S. (2016). House of Quality: An Effective Approach to Achieve Customer Satisfaction & Business Growth in Industries. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(9), 1365-1371.
Quality. (2010). Quality Manual of UiTM Cawangan Pulau Pinang, ISO 9001:2008.
Rusul, A. (2015). “Teaching Empathy Through Design Thinking”. George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/teaching-empathy-through-design-thinking-rusul-alrubail.
Sagir, M., & Ozturk, Z. K. (2010). Exam scheduling: Mathematical modelling and parameter estimation with the Analytic Network Process approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(5), 930–941.
Sarin, S. C., Wang, Y., & Varadarajan, A. (2010). A university-timetabling problem and its solution using Benders‘ partitioning - a case study. Journal of Scheduling, 13(2), 131–141.
Shapira, H., Ketchie, A., Nehe, M. (2017). The integration of Design Thinking and Strategic Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 277-287.
In-Text Citation: (Othman et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Othman, J., Abdullah, S. S. S., Zahari, M. F., Hamat, M., Samsudin, N., Mazeni, N. A., & Rosly, W. N. S. W. M. (2022). Determining Users’ Requirements Through Design Thinking Methodology for Developing Examination Invigilation Management Systems (EXIMS). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(5), 224 – 238.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode