ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study deals with the criminal evidence system in Islamic jurisprudence. The importance of the study stems from its review of the Islamic precedence in deciding the rules of criminal evidence. Its importance also lies in the fact that it shows a set of methods of evidence that are dealt with by the positive law at a later time after they were decided by the noble Sharia. The objective of this study is to identify the criminal evidence system in Islamic jurisprudence and to show the methods of evidence approved by Islamic sharia in this context. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher adopts the descriptive analytical approach. The researcher reaches several results, the most important of which is that Islamic sharia has preceded in addressing the system of criminal evidence. The researcher also concludes that Islamic sharia approved a set of methods for criminal evidence, including what is agreed upon among jurists, and what was approved by some of them and disapproved by the others. The study ends with a set of recommendations, the most important of which is the necessity of implementing all methods that lead to the prevalence of the truth according to specific regulations so that there is no exaggeration in their estimation. The researcher also recommends the implementation of the methods of evidence approved by Islamic Sharia in all judicial facilities in Islamic countries so that they are interpreted in accordance with the rules and regulations of Islamic sharia.
Al-Laheidan, M. (1980). Means of Evidence in Islamic Law.
Alotaibi, A. (2021). The challenges of execution of Islamic criminal law in developing Muslim Countries: An analysis based on Islamic principles and existing legal system. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1925413-1925427.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2021a). The neural correlates of emotion in decision-making. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 64-77.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2021b). Neuromarketing: Marketing research in the new millennium. Neuroscience Research Notes, 4(3), 27-35.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2021c). Neuromarketing: The popularity of the brain-imaging and physiological tools. Neuroscience Research Notes, 3(5), 13-22.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2021d). To better understand the role of emotional processes in decision-making. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 10(2), 49-67.
Al-Jawziyya, M. (1991). Informing the signatories about the Lord of the Worlds. Investigated by Muhammad Abd al-Salam Ibrahim al-Nasher, 1st Edition. Scientific Books House. Beirut, Lebanon.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., Abuhassna, H., & Alsharif, Y. H. (2022). Neuromarketing in Malaysia: Challenges, limitations, and solutions. International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), Chiangrai, Thailand. 740-745.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., Abuhassna, H., & Hashem, A. R. E. (2022). A global research trends of neuromarketing: 2015-2020. Revista de Comunicación, 21(1), 15-32.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., & Alharthi, R. H. E. (2021e). Neuromarketing research in the last five years: a bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1978620.
Al-Awa, M. (1986). The original innocence of the accused, from the research of the first scientific symposium on the accused and his rights in Islamic law. The Arab Center for Security Studies and Training. Riyadh, Kingdom Saudi Arabia.
Al-Zuhaili, M. (1982). Means of Evidence in Islamic Sharia in Civil Transactions and Personal Status. Dar Al Bayan Library. Damascus, Syria.
Shniora, A. (2005). Evidence by experience. Dar Al-Nafais Publications, 1st Edition.
Al-Omar, M. (2020). Criminal experience in Islamic law. Journal of Islamic Studies. 15 (1), 40-55.
Al-Basal, A. (1997). Base excuses and tricks. Wisdom Magazine. 4(14), 61-76.
Al-Qurtubi, I. (2014). The Beginning of the Mujtahid and the End of the Economical. Ibn Hazm House.
Al-Sarakhsi, S. (1989). Al-Mabsout, 1st Edition. House knowledge, Beirut, Lebanon.
Said, O. (2018). The nature of the evidence and its place in the Algerian civil law and judiciary. Horizons Journal of Science. 3 (4). 30-34.
Al-Waraghmi, M. (1993). legal boundaries. Investigation by Muhammad Abu Al-Ajnan. House of the Islamic West.
Al-Abdlawi, I. (1986). Private Judicial Law C2.
Bahnasy, A. (1962). Evidence theory in Islamic criminal jurisprudence. The Arab Company for Printing and Publishing. 3(4) 50-54.
Zidan, A. (2002). Judicial system in Islamic law. Al-Resalah Foundation, 3rd Edition. Beirut, Lebanon.
Baraka, M. (2010). Electronic Proof Means: A jurisprudential study compared to the Saudi system for electronic transactions. Master Thesis. King Saud University. Riyadh, Kingdom Saudi Arabia.
Halawa, R. (2003). Criminal proof rules and evidence. A comparative study of Islamic law. Arab Renaissance House. Cairo, Egypt.
Nasser, O. (2014). Proving cybercrime in Islamic jurisprudence and Syrian and Emirati law. Master Thesis. Omdurman Islamic University. Sudan.
Salama, M. (1982). General Principles of Criminal Evidence in Islamic Jurisprudence. Oceana Publications, New York, USA. 109-123.
In-Text Citation: (Altamimi et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Altamimi, K. H. S. S., Marni, N. Bin, & Shehab, A. (2022). Criminal Evidence System in Islamic Jurisprudence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(5), 1001 – 1011.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode