ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Reimagination works of Shakespeare have become a popular form of theatre in Malaysia. This study ascertains that the productions of Shakespeare have shifted to the newest method of adaptation namely reimagination as theoretical discourse moves from the notion of fidelity to original texts. This study argues that A Midsummer Night’s Dream (AMND) (2012) retains Shakespeare’s imagination; however, the director of the adaptation has his own imaginations, interpretations and cultural agenda in maintaining the essence of Shakespeare. The main objective of this study is to provide a holistic analysis of the adaptation of AMND in Malaysia. Subsequently, its sub-objectives are to explore the imaginations and cultural agenda of the director of AMND (2012) as well as interpret the extent to which the Malaysian director offers a new interpretation to AMND’s original text. This research answers the question of how the director of AMND (2012) adapted the Bard in the context of imagination. Qualitative methods including interpretivist, interviews and textual analysis through Coleridge’s theory of imagination and Aristotle’s theory of drama were used in this study. Findings demonstrated that AMND (2012) maintains Shakespeare’s words; nevertheless, the Bard introduced the local traditional art forms and ethos through the director’s imaginations. The theoretical structure of this paper offers an empirical basis for formulating and inventing adaptations from Shakespeare's imagination to the Malaysian director’s imagination. This research also provides a workable study paradigm to be applied to Shakespeare's adaptation practice in Malaysia.
Butcher, S. H. (1895). The Poetics by Aristotle. Macmillan.
Coleridge, S. T. (2004). Biographia Literaria. Gutenberg.org.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/6081/6081-h/6081-h.htm (Original work published 1817)
Critical Analysis of Coleridge’s Imagination and Fancy. (2014). Kheralatika.wordpress. https://kheralatika.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/critical-analysis-of-coleridges-imagination-and-fancy/
Jukka, O. M. (1992). Classical Dance and Theatre in South-East Asia. Oxford University Press
Begum, M., Masron, T., Mustafa, M. A. S., Shafii, H., & Low, N. F. (2014). A Midsummer Night’s Dream Dessected through Philosophy, Geographical Information Systems Mapping of Dance and Choreography: An Experimental Process. In Norizan Esa, Leela Rajamani & Zuraidah Mohd. Yusoff (Eds.). Reengineering local Knowledge: Life Science and Technology (pp. 112 – 124). Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Low, N. F. (2015). The politics and economics of Malaysian campus productions of Shakespeare. In Hartley, A. J., Shakespeare on the University Stage (pp. 168–184). Cambridge University Press.
Schechner, R. (2006). Performance studies: An introduction. Routledge.
Koay, S. Y. (2012). A short write up about the company and the production! indigenousshakespeareco.wordpress. https://indigenousshakespeareco.wordpress.com/
Surman, S. (2017). What re primary and secondary imagination?. penandthepad.com, https://penandthepad.com/primary-secondary-imagination-6623098.html
In-Text Citation: (Panan & Yeoh, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Panan, A. P., & Yeoh, P. A. (2022). Reimagination of William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream: Performance Text Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(5), 949 – 956.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode