ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Studies investigating forest discourses both from within and outside the forest discourse community have seen a growing interest in how forest policies and their governance affect forest communities, the people, and the countries. There has been a debate on whether these studies, which claimed to be studied following Foucault’s concepts of discourse, power, knowledge and governmentality have contributed to deriving empirical findings on how forest discourses have impacted and affected those involved in the implementation of the discourses. Additionally, it was found that forest communities pointed out the need for studies to be conducted to probe into how forest information is used, by whom and for what purpose. To date, little is known about those involved in forest discourses, what functions the discourses serve to those involved, and their impact on the forest community in general. Thus, this paper reviews the discussions on forest discourses that lack insights into those involved in forest discourses. This paper proceeds by providing relevant details on the concepts of discourse and genre from a linguistic perspective. Additionally, some possible ways to understand forest discourses and policy governance, particularly drawing from the linguistic perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The paper concludes with the possible inclusion of another possible direction for further studies in forest discourses, particularly from a linguistic perspective on forest discourses concerning forest policies and governance.
Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5-6), 340-347.
Arts, B. J. M., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pulzl, H., Visseren-Hamakers, I. (2010). Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. In Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime (No. 28, pp. 57-74). International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO).
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The Problem of Speech Genres. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. Vern W. McGee. Ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P. pp. 60-102.
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research and Pedagogy. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press LLC.
Burns, A. (1990). Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. Prospect, 5 (3), 63-71.
Coe, R. M., & Freedman, A. (1998). Genre theory: Australian and North American approaches. In M. L. Kennedy (Ed.), Theorising composition: A critical source-book of theory and scholarship in contemporary composition studies (pp. 136-147). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Devitt, A. J. (2000). Integrating rhetorical and literary theories of genre. College English, 62, 696-718.
Duvemo, K., & Lamas, T. (2006). The influence of forest data quality on planning processes in forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21(4), 327-339.
Eggins, S. (2007). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Second Edition. London: Continuum.
Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., Hassan, H., Saidalvi, A., Adnan, W. N. A. W., & Sazalli, N. (2022). Representation of Experiential Meaning in Forestry Professional Report Genre. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1), 1990–1998.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i1/12020
Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., Saidalvi, A., Zaid, Y. H., & Hassan, H. (2021). Enriching Student Knowledge on Sustainable Forest Management Practices by Forestry Professionals: A Look into the Generic Structure Potential of Malaysian Forestry Annual Reports. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 864–880.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i7/10542
Fontaine, L. (2013). Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisations of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 43–76.
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Second Edition). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). On Grammar. Collected Works of MAK Halliday. Vol. 1. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd edition. Routledge. London: Arnold.
Helan, R. (2012). Analysis of Published Medical Case Reports: Genre-based study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Masaryk University, Czech Republic.
Hussain, S. S., Ali, A. M., Kasim, Z. M., Jalaluddin, I. (2020). A Review on the Rhetorical Structure and Linguistic Features of Corporate Annual Reports. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10 (9), 236-256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7591
Kleinn, C., & Stahl, G. (2006). We generate sound information on the forest resource: but does our data and information really matter. A discussion paper – Keynote Paper at the 8th FIA Symposium. Monterey, California. pp. 16–19.
Leipold, S. (2014). Creating forests with words – A review of forest-related discourse studies. Forest Policy and Economics, 40, 12-20.
Martin, J. R., Frances, C., & Rothery, J. (1994). Social process in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In Language, literacy and learning in educational practice, edited by B. Stierer and J. Maybin. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Miller, C. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Genre and the New Rhetoric. Ed. Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway. Bristol: Taylor and Francis. pp. 67-77.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring meaning in language. In James Paul Gee and Michael Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 21-34). New York: Routledge.
Winkel, G. (2012). Foucault in the forests: A review of the use of Foucauldian concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 81-92.
Yunick, S. (1997). Genres, registers and sociolinguistics. World Englishes, 13 (3), 321-336.
In-Text Citation: (Fakhruddin, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W. (2022). A Review on Directions for Discussing Forest Governance and Discourses from a Linguistic Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 12(6), 392 – 403.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode