ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Many countries have begun to pay more attention to the concept of social entrepreneurship simply because it is considered as an efficient method for the sustainable development of underserved areas as well as for the acceleration of government initiatives and private investment. The activities of social entrepreneurship have emerged as an efficient method for the creation of solutions for social issues including accessibility to education, healthcare, water, food, and electricity supply. A researcher collected the data in the field and analyzed it using a qualitative case study methodology. This study was conducted at CHEMA (Community Habitat Environmental Management), a non-governmental organization in a rural area located in Karagwe, Tanzania. The research sample yielded a total of 16 important informants, including 10 employees and 6 peasants who participated in focus groups. The research findings indicated that social entrepreneurship projects relieve poverty and improve rural livelihoods in Tanzania by increasing and strengthening agricultural production, increasing people's ability to deal with hunger, preserving the environment, maximizing household income, and enhancing the effectiveness of agricultural activities. Even though social entrepreneurship has helped rural communities improve their lives and reduce poverty through its activities, the projects have not made a big difference because of problems like donor dropout, lack of knowledge, and poor infrastructure in rural areas. Despite all the advantages of social entrepreneurship projects, the social entrepreneurship concept is still in its infancy stage in Tanzania, which brings a lot of questions to society. It is advised that more research on impacts of social entrepreneurship projects should be done by scholars to gain more attention to contribute more awareness for both government and private organizations.
Acs, Zoltan., & Audretsch, D. B. (2003). The International Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bjerk, P. (2017). Julius Nyerere. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. 165 pp.
Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), B-141 and B-142.
Dees, J. G. (1998) The Meaning of “Social Entrepreneurship”. The Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Kansas City, MO and Palo Alto, CA.
Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., &Kasser, T. (2014). The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 879-924.
Drayton, W. (2006). Everyone a Changemaker. In Innovation (pp. 8–11). MIT
Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3): 120-+.
Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34(5): 615-639.
George, A. M. (2009). Identifying social entrepreneurs serving the poor at the BoP. William Davidson Institute Working Paper, 972.
Hartigan, P. (2006) “It’s About People, Not Profits”. Business Strategy Review,
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24: 419–435.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24: 419–435.
Nyaki, C. (2015). Nyerere’s Philosophy of Economic Equality. Ndanda- Peramiho: Benedictine Publications] Tanzania Press.
Rosa, P., & Kodithuwakku, S. (2002). The entrepreneurial process and economic success in a constrained environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 431-465.
Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. (1994) Impact of Agency Risks and Task Uncertainty on Venture Capital. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1618-1632.
Scott, W. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications.
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz, & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth: 119-138. Greenwich: JAI Press.
West, G. P., Bamford, C. E., & Marsden, J. W. (2008). Contrasting Entrepreneurial Economic Development in Emerging Latin American Economies: Applications and Extensions of Resource-Based Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 15–36.
(http://chematanzania.org/), accessed on the 20th of April 2020.
In-Text Citation: (Kalangari, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Kalangari, R. (2022). Social Entrepreneurial Activities for Rural Livelihood Improvement and Poverty Reduction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 12(7), 54 – 69.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode