Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Evaluation of Residential Satisfaction in Dwelling Unit Features of Public Low-Cost Housing

Hezzrin Mohd Pauzi, Wan Abd Aziz Wan Mohd Amin, Norruzeyati Che Mohd Nasir

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i8/14278

Open access

A dwelling is one of man’s most basic needs. In Malaysia’s case, the National Housing Policy has made housing one of the main strategic mechanisms in eradicating poverty. This policy is seen to have a significant influence in dealing with the problems of excessive population growth and in-demand community development. For these reasons, a study on the status of one housing programme for the poor and those of the low-income bracket, namely the Low-Cost Housing Programme (LCHP), in influencing the quality of life of its target group was carried out. A field study was done to evaluate the consistency of the internal physical characteristics of the LCHP with the housing needs of the target group. A structured questionnaire was the main instrument utilised in the primary data collection of this study. Around 325 household heads of six flat-type LCHPs in Kuala Terengganu were involved in this study. The study’s findings are able to give positive implications in improving the planning and the policy of the LCHP as well as increasing the quality of life of the target groups.

Abd Hadi, Z. (2004). Ketiadaan Reaksi Masyarakat Terhadap Kelakuan Anti-Sosial. Jurnal Pentadbiran Sosial Malaysia, 3(1), 71-82.
Fatimah, A. (2009). Evolusi Rumah dan Kehidupan Keluarga. Sari- International Journal of the Malay World and Civilisation, 27(2), 247- 263.
Haris, A. W. (2009). Penilaian Keperluan Dalam Pembangunan Komuniti: Kajian Kes Di Negeri Kelantan. Universiti Malaya.
Hezzrin, M. P., Hajar, S. A. B. A., & Lukman, Z. M. (2017). The Evaluation of Neighborhood Facilities and Services of Low Cost Housing (LCH) in Kuala Terengganu: Residential Satisfaction Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 704 – 712.
Humphrys, G. (1968). A Map of Housing Quality in the United Kingdom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(2), 31-36
Jaiyeoba, E. B., & Asojo, A. O. (2020). A People- Centred Social Totality Approach to Low-Income Housing in the Developing World. In Sustainability Concept in Developing Countries (pp. 1- 16). IntechOpen.
Nurizan, Y. (2004). Perumahan dan Kemudahan Isi Rumah Golongan Berpendapatan Rendah Bandar. In Mohd,A.O., & Nurizan,Y, Golongan Berpendapatan Rendah Realiti dan Cabaran (pp.124- 136). Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Sheelah, S., Hafizah, N. J., Nurhayati, K., Puvaneswary, T., Amalina, A., & Ameera, P. M. K. (2019). Assessment of Residents’ Satisfaction on Building Maintenance in Public Low-Cost Housing. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1), 260-265.
Nor’aini, Y. (2007). Pemaju Swasta dan Perumahan Kos Rendah. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Nooriah, Y. (2019). Faktor Penyumbang kepada Tekanan Perumahan di Kawasan Perumahan Kos Rendah dan Sederhana Rendah di Pulau Pinang. Kemanusiaan, 26 (1), 143-171.
Rosdan, A. M. (2006). Wacana Moral Senibina dan Kritikan Terhadap Senibina Tempatan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Hajar, S. A. B. A. (2006). Kebajikan Sosial: Aplikasi Dalam Perkhidmatan Manusia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Hajar, S. A. B. A.(2002). Pengantar Dasar Sosial Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Syamuri, W. M. (2004). Perlaksanaan dan Kepuasan Perumahan Kos Rendah di Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Zakiyah, J., Syed, I., Sharifah, S.A., & Afifah, A.Y. (2004). Rumah Kos Rendah: Masalah dan Penyelesaian. Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia.

In-Text Citation: (Pauzi et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Pauzi, H. M., Amin, W. A. A. W. M., & Nasir, N. C. M. (2022). Evaluation of Residential Satisfaction in Dwelling Unit Features of Public Low-Cost Housing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 37 – 49.