Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Improving Second Language Learners Writing Using a Linguistic Feedback Tool (LiFT)

Nur Hidayatulshima Omar, Mohd Khairulfaidz Shamsudin

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/14503

Open access

Writing is one of the skills that is considered difficult for second language learners as they are required to have a certain amount of L2 background knowledge especially the appropriate and accurate use of language or specific lexicon to communicate with their readers better. Previous studies indicate that second language learners' significant writing problems are insufficient linguistic proficiency, including the command over grammar, syntax, and vocabulary. In the teaching and learning context, the ability to write well for a student depends on the amount of practice and the support from the teachers' meaningful feedback. Along with the advancement in educational technology, this study intends to investigate the use of a Linguistic Feedback Tool (LiFT) to improve students' writing by identifying and providing feedback on the use of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The data were collected from 30 secondary school students using three instruments, i.e. interview, students' essays, and questionnaires. The findings reveal that using a LiFT improves students' English writing quality and minimize errors.

Bailey, D., & Lee, A. R. (2020). An exploratory study of Grammarly in the language learning context: An analysis of test-based, textbook-based and Facebook corpora. TESOL International Journal, 15 (2), pp. 4-27
Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10 (1), pp. 223-236.
Chappell, V. (2011). What makes writing so important? Retrieved February 16, 2021, from http://www.marquette.edu/wac/WhatMakesWritingSoImportant.shtml.
Clark, C. (2009). Don’t diss blogs and social networking sites: Young people’s writing and technology. Literacy Today, 61, pp. 28-29.
David, A. R., Thang, S. M., & Hazita, A. (2015). Accommodating low profieciency ESL students’ language learning needs through an online writing support system. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 10 (1), pp. 118-127.
Ebadi, S., and Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods study, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), pp. 787-815.
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4, pp. 81–92.
Goldstein, A. A., & Carr, P. G. (1996). Can students benefit from process writing, NCES Report, 3(1), pp. 96-845.
Hiew, W. (2012). English language teaching and learning issues in Malaysia: Learners’ perceptions via Facebook dialogue journal. Researchers World, 3(1), pp. 11-19.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Jayavalan, K., and Razali, M. A. B. (2018). Effectiveness of online grammar checker to improve secondary students' English narrative essay writing. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 2 (1), pp. 1-6.
Karyuatry, L., Rizqan, M. D., & Darayani, N. A. (2018). Grammarly as a tool to improve students’ writing quality. Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), pp. 83-89
Lim, F. V., & Phua, J. (2019). Teaching writing with language feedback technology. Computers & Composition, 54, 102518.
McCurry, D. (2010). Can machine scoring deal with broad and open writing tests as well as human readers? Assessing Writing, 15(2), pp. 118-129.
Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ, 6(2). Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej22/a1.html
Neda, G., Mariadass, M. E., and Seyyed, H. K. (2012). Investigating Malaysian ESL students’ writing problems on conventions, punctuation, and language use at secondary school level. Journal of Studies in Education, 2 (3), pp. 130-143.
Negro, I., and Chanquoy, L. (2005). Explicit and implicit training of subject-verb agreement processing in 3rd and 5th Grades. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5(2), pp. 193-214.
Nik, Y. A., Hamzah, A., & Rafidee, H. (2010). A comparative study on the factors a
ecting the writing performance among Bachelor students. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1 (1), pp.54-59.
Quintero, L. M. (2008). Blogging: A way to foster EFL writing. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10 (1), pp. 7-49.
Rusinovci, X. (2015). Teaching writing through process-genre based approach. US-China Education Review A 5, 699–705. doi: 10.17265/2161-623x/2015.10a.006
Saeed, M. A., and Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2022). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. Language Learning Journal, 50(3), pp. 360-377(18).
Vikneswaran, T., and Krish, P. (2015). Utilising social networking sites to improve writing: A case study with Chinese students in Malaysia, Technology Pedagogy and Education 25(3), pp. 1-14
Foo, V. C. T. (2007). The effects of the process-genre approach to writing instruction on
the expository essays of ESL students in a Malaysian secondary school. Unpublished PhD
thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia
Walsh, K. (2010). The importance of writing skills: Online tools to encourage success. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from http://www.emergingedtech.com/2010/11/the-importance-of-writing-skills-online-tools-to-encourage-success
Wang, P. (2013). Can automated writing evaluation programs help students improve their english writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1),
pp. 6-12.

In-Text Citation: (Omar & Shamsudin, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Omar, N. H., & Shamsudin, M. K. (2022). Improving Second Language Learners Writing Using a Linguistic Feedback Tool (LiFT). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 888 – 895.