ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Infographics are visual representations of information in such a way that information can be easily understood at a glance. Infographics are a form of the most powerful stimulator of visual communication in the digital era, and it is gaining popularity among educators. The creation of teaching and learning materials has become critical for students at all levels of education. However there are still insufficient studies that have systematically reviewed the existing literature on infographic acceptance in higher education. Therefore, this article is intended to conduct a systematic literature review on infographic acceptance in facilitating teaching and learning among students in higher education. The current study has combined multiple research designs, and the review was based on the ROSES publication standard (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses). This study selected papers using two of the most prominent databases: Scopus and Science Direct, and it used Google Scholar as the secondary database. A thematic analysis was implemented and 4 main themes were produced, namely 1) Presentable and efficient; 2) Understandable, 3) Visual literacy, and 4) Facilitating teaching and learning. The study made several significant contributions to the body of knowledge and for practical purposes. The findings have explained the importance of visual communication specifically infographics as a tool for facilitating teaching and learning process and for providing information on specific research areas and content that should be the focus of future studies.
Afify, M. K. (2018). The effect of the difference between infographic designing types (static vs animated) on developing visual learning designing skills and recognition of its elements and Principles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(09), 204. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8541
Alqudah, D., Bidin, A. B., & Hussin, M. A. (2019). The impact of educational infographic on students’ interaction and perception in Jordanian Higher Education: Experimental Study. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.
, H., & Özcan, D. (2017). Can infographics facilitate the learning of individuals with mathematical learning difficulties? International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1702119b
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Charrois, T. L. (2015). Systematic reviews: What do you need to know to get started? The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(2). https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i2.1440
Chicca, J., & Chunta, K. (2020). Engaging students with visual stories: Using infographics in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.09.003
Darcy, R. (2019). Infographics, assessment and digital literacy: innovating learning and teaching through developing ethically responsible digital competencies in public health. Research Repository, 112.
Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). Getting graphic about infographics: Design lessons learned from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144x.2016.1205832
Fadzil, H. M. (2018). Designing infographics for the Educational Technology Course: Perspectives of PRE-SERVICE science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.08
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or Meta?analyses? evaluating retrieval qualities of google scholar, pubmed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS ONE, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.013823
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). Roses reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of google scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
Heimburger, A., & Isomottonen, V. (2019). Infographics as a reflective assignment method in requirements engineering e-course? 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028528
Hsiao, P. Y., Laquatra, I., Johnson, R. M., & Smolic, C. E. (2019). Using infographics to teach the evidence analysis process to senior undergraduate students. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 119(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.022
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2022). Infographics in higher education: A scoping review. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20427530221107774.
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2022). Visual literacy development through infographics. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_17
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Martin, L. J., Turnquist, A., Groot, B., Huang, S. Y. M., Kok, E., Thoma, B., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Exploring the role of infographics for summarizing medical literature. Health Professions Education, 5(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.03.005
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google scholar, web of science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Martix, S., & Hodson, J. (2014). Teaching with infographics: practising new digital competencies and visual literacies.
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020). Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120595
Moher, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The Prisma statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Naparin, H., & Binti Saad, A. (2017). Infographics in education : Review on infographics design. The International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications, 9(4/5/6), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijma.2017.9602
Noh, M. A., Shamsudin, W. N., Nudin, A. L., Jing, H. F., Daud, S. M., Abdullah, N. N., & Harun, M. F. (2015). The use of infographics as a tool for facilitating learning. International Colloquium of Art and Design Education Research (i-CADER 2014), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-332-3_57.
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743
Ozdaml?, F., Kocakoyun, S., Sahin, T., & Akdag, S. (2016). Statistical reasoning of impact of infographics on Education. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.414
Parveen, A., & Husain, N. (2021). Infographis as a promising tool for teaching and learning.
Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Inclusion and exclusion criteria in research studies: Definitions and why they matter. Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia, 44(2), 84–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562018000000088
Rahim, N. N., Khidzir, N. Z., Yusof, A. M., & Saidin, A. Z. (2016). An assessment of quality on animated Infographics in an islamic context. In Proceedings 2016 IEEE international conference on teaching and learning in education (ICTLE 2016).
Savini, C. A., Gasull, V. L., & Gimeno, P. B. (2019). Infographics. A way to increase competences. 2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE). https://doi.org/10.1109/edunine.2019.8875773
Seehra, J., Pandis, N., Koletsi, D., & Fleming, P. S. (2016). Use of quality assessment tools in systematic reviews was varied and inconsistent. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.023
Traboco, L., Pandian, H., Nikiphorou, E., & Gupta, L. (2022). Designing infographics: Visual representations for enhancing education, Communication, and Scientific Research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(27). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e214
Walker, J. J. (2007). systematic reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide- by Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.498_4.x
Wanden-Berghe, C., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2012). Systematic reviews in nutrition: Standardized methodology. British Journal of Nutrition, 107(S2). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114512001432
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17723971.
In-Text Citation: (Ahmad et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Ahmad, A. K. A., Rahaman, A. A., Abdullah, M., Johari, M. H., & Aziz, M. N. A. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on Infographic Acceptance Factors in Facilitating Teaching and Learning among Students in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 1119 – 1134.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode