ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Major structural changes have occurred in the global socioeconomic environment, and a large portion of these changes can be attributed to the transformational power of information and communication technologies (ICT). It is generally accepted that having access to ICT will lead to social development and economic growth. However, the digital revolution does not offer the same opportunities for every individual equally. The digital divide (the gap between demographics and geographic areas with and without access to modern ICT) poses a threat to the outcome. The Covid-19 outbreak has also played a significant role in bringing the issue to the forefront. The analysis of this topic contributes to a better understanding of the issue and will aid those working to close the gap. Thus, this study aimed to revalidate the scale of attitude toward ICT and the impact on the digital divide, and get expert consensus and views for this scale. This study uses the Fuzzy Delphi method with a 7-Likert scale to gather responses from 7 experts in higher learning institutions in Malaysia. A total of 4 key constructs and 20 sub-elements or items of questionnaires were given to experts for evaluation. The Fuzzy Delphi method Logic Software (FUDELO) has been used for data analysis. Triangular fuzzy numbering (triangular fuzzy number) was used to examine the data, and the "defuzzification" process was used to determine each item's ranking. The results show that the level of response and expert agreement on the scale is good. The overall expert consensus score is higher than 75% and the overall threshold (d) value is < 0.2. The results from the defuzzification process show that all items reach consensus and are valid through the expert judgment process. Therefore, the items that have been validated meet the required criteria. This will allow future research on the digital divide to use attitudes towards ICT as factors (determinants) of the digital divide in Malaysia.
Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health: Jessica Kingsley Publisher
Ahmad, N. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. (2019). Gender digital divide: Digital skills among Malaysian secondary school. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 668-687.
Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet, 6(4), 673-687.
Aswathi, P. & Haneefa K, Mohamed. (2020). Attitude towards Information Technology and Digital Divide: A Study among Students in Universities in Kerala, India. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 4437.
Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Chang, P.-C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European journal of operational research, 142(1), 174-186.
Darus, M. Y., Ariffin, M. A. M., Jalil, M. H., & Yusof, M. A. M. (2021). A Case Study on Digital Divide and Access to Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Pulau Tuba, Langkawi, Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(5), 1710-1718.
Esa, N. A. A. M., Aloysius, C. F., Kusijih, E., & Shengwen, L. (2021). Factors that Influence the Ability of Secondary School Students in Using Online Education in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics (MJBE), 95-108.
Faziharudean, T. M., & Mitomo, H. (2003). Explaining Digital Divide as a Consequence of Uneven Digital Opportunities between Urban and Rural Areas: A Case of Internet Usage among Senior High School Students in Kelantan, Malaysia. Studies in Regional Science, 33(3), 287-298.
Foo, L. N., Lai, W. K., & Elamzazuthi, C. (2017). Narrowing the Digital Divide in Malaysia: Issues and Initiatives. In ASEAN Journal on Science and Technology for Development (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 97–110). https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.342
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
Ismail, K. (2012). Digital divide and computer literacy from sociological perspective: a case study among malay male and female teenagers. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(12), 11-26.
Lebens, M., Graff, M., & Mayer, P. (2009). Access, attitudes and the digital divide: children’s attitudes towards computers in a technology?rich environment. Educational Media International, 46(3), 255-266.
Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
Mohammad, S., Yamani, R. U. S., Arshad, M. N. M., & Ariffin, M. I. (2021). Covid-19 Pandemic and Addressing Digital Divide in Malaysia. Journal of Information Systems and Digital Technologies, 3(2), 29–49.
Mullen, P. M. (2003). Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of health organization and management. Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319
Mustapha, R., Awang, H., Mahmud, M., & Mohd, N. (2022). Revalidation of Islamophobia Scale: The Fuzzy Delphi Method Approach.
Mustapha, R, & Darusalam, G. (2017). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam Kajian Sains Sosial. Penerbitan Universiti Malaya. Kuala Lumpur.
Nair, M., Han, G. S., Lee, H., Goon, P., & Muda, R. (2010). Determinants of the digital divide in rural communities of a developing country: The case of Malaysia. Development and Society, 39(1), 139-162.
Ojo, A. O., Alias, M., Dorasamy, M., Sarwar, A., & Ojo, O. T. (2022). Moderating effects of opportunity on the Cognitive and Motivational Factors of Internet engagement: A Study of the digital divide in Malaysia. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 18(1), 1-17.
Ragnedda, M. (2017). The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. In The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities.
Skulmoski, G. J., & Hartman, F. T. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1), 1–21. doi:10.1.1.151.8144
Sulaiman, S., & Halamy, S. (2021). ICT Education as a Catalyst to Bridge Digital Divide: The Roles of UiTM Sarawak in Rural Areas. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(2), 174-181.
Surianshah, S. (2021). Digital Divide in Education during COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 55(3), 103-112.
Tokiran, N. S. M., Hussin, N., & Shahibi, M. S. (2021). Challenges in Implementation of Digital Culture Environment among Rural Community in Malaysia: An Overview. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 11(3), 25-33.
In-Text Citation: (Hashim & Dali, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Hashim, I. M., & Dali, F. (2022). Attitude towards Information & Communication Technology (ICT) and Digital Divide: What Academicians Say? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 829 – 843.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode