ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Second language production, and proficiency are measured based on the Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency dimensions. During their learning process, learners master the multicomponent dimensions also known as the CAF construct. Second language learners often master one component at a time and prior research on the present demography has been minimal. Hence, the present research looks at language accuracy among Malaysian English as a second language (ESL) learners’ written language. The population chosen for this study is tertiary level students who have undergone formal English language classes in schools for 11 years. In the present setting, they are undergoing prerequisite English classes in the local university that they attend. Following six weeks of classes where learners revise the grammatical and writing aspects of the lesson, they then complete a writing task which is then analyzed for errors and language accuracy. Six major areas are identified as inaccuracy in learners’ language production. 20 writing tasks are analyzed through error analysis, and this process reveals that learners’ accuracies are apparent in their vocabulary, first language/mother tongue interference, sentence structure, subject-verb agreement, tenses and word form. Ten out the total 20 documents contained severe accuracy errors that affect coherence, comprehension and maturity in the written product. Learners who struggle with accuracy often have unsuitable, long-winded and/or incorrect products be it in listening, speaking, reading, or in the present study’s scenario, writing. Further research in the CAF construct is encouraged especially among the same demography to address the issue of poor language mastery and proficiency.
Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL Learners’ Challenges in Speaking English in Malaysian Classroom. Development, 10(2), 983-991.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in second language acquisition, 11(1), 17-34.
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., & Granger, S. (1998). Computer-aided error analysis. System, 26(2), 163-174.
Darus, S., & Ching, K. H. (2009). Common errors in written English essays of form one Chinese students: A case study. European Journal of social sciences, 10(2), 242-253.
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17.
Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies. Language Teaching, 45(4), 446-459.
Garcia-Pastor, M. D. (2018). Linguistic accuracy in Spanish adolescent learners’ EFL writings. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 57, 79-99.
James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.
Kenworthy, R. (2006). Timed versus At-Home Assessment Tests: Does Time Affect the Quality of Second Language Learners' Written Compositions?. TESL-EJ, 10(1), 1.
Kim, Y. S. (2011). The effect of cognitive task complexity on a language learner’s written performance with respect to accuracy, complexity, and fluency, 27(2), 285-313.
Kim, Y., Nam, J., & Lee, S. Y. (2016). Correlation of proficiency with complexity, accuracy, and fluency in spoken and written production: Evidence from L2 Korean. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 19, 147-181.
Lennon, P. (1991). Error: Some problems of definition, identification, and distinction. Applied linguistics, 12(2), 180-196.
Llosa, L., Beck, S. W., & Zhao, C. G. (2011). An investigation of academic writing in secondary schools to inform the development of diagnostic classroom assessments. Assessing writing, 16(4), 256-273.
Mediero, M., & Robles, A. (2012). Exploring the errors made by EFL students at the university level. Exploring the Errors Made by EFL Students at the University Level, 63-74.
Pishkar, K., Moeinzadeh, A., & Dabaghi, A. (2016). Effect of teaching modern English drama on the students’ fluency and accuracy of speaking. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(1), 41-51.
Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language learning, 47(1), 101-143.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2015). Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing?. System, 49, 110-119.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.
Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual review of applied linguistics, 18, 268-286.
In-Text Citation: (Raslee et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Raslee, N. N., Zaidi, A., Hanafi, M., Iksan, H., Awaluddin, F. A., & Kamarudin, S. (2022). Malaysian Second Language Learners’ Linguistic Accuracy in Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 1351 – 1364.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode