Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Soco v2: Legal Pocket on Liabilities and Standard of Care for Tourism Industry During Pandemic Covid-19

Suria Fadhillah Md Pauzi, Mohamad Sahizam Musa, Shamsinar Rahman, Mohd Azim Zainal, Ida Rosnita Ismail, Zuriani Yaacob

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/15001

Open access

COVID-19 has unquestionably had a negative influence on the Malaysian industry, including tourism. Players in the tourism industry who provide spaces for recreational and leisure activities have not only uncertainties about how to handle activities in their facilities during the epidemic without breaking the law, but also about how to stay afloat and avoid being dissolved owing to financial losses. Under the law, a person who has a sufficient degree of control over a premise is considered an occupier and bears a duty of care to protect the safety of visitors to his premises. As a result, any industry player in charge of a recreational or leisure facility is clearly required to take reasonable safeguards and appropriate precautions before reopening the business. The objective of this product is to create awareness among tourism industry players of the standard of care to be observed by visitors during the operation of their business while adhering to the standard operating procedures (SOPs) provided by the government. The product’s novelty can be found in the legal framework’s construction, in which it eradicates the difficulty in learning and understanding the laws. The product can steer the reader to comprehend the concept of duty of care as outlined by common law. It can be used as a reference for tourism players in handling their business operations as it integrates the standard of care to be observed by the industry in accordance with the types of visitors of the said premise with the standard of operating procedures ordained by the government. In addition, the simplification of the law makes it easy to understand for non-legal background readers.

Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd v Emas Bestari Sdn Bhd. (2014). 2 MLJ 49.
Bernama. (2020). Covid-19: Malaysia's tourism industry hit with RM45 billion in losses. The New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/06/604012/covid-19-malaysias-tourism-industry-hit-rm45-billion-losses
Blyth v. Birmigham Waterworks Co. (1856) 11 Ex 781.
Caparo Industries PLC v. Dickman. (1990). UKHL 2.
Domestic Tourism Survey. (2019). by State (Issue September). (2020).
https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=UVZoQXZ WUmhUaGxadW95RWdBL2QxZz09
Donoghue vs. Stevenson. (1932). AC 562, 580.
Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills. (1935). UKPC 62.
Hall v Brooklands Auto-Racing Club. (1933). 1 KB 205.
Hartwell v Grayson Rollo and Clover Docks Ltd. (1947). KB 917.
Couldson, H., & Purely Urban District Council. (1953). 2 All ER 319.
Jr, J. K. (2020). Focus on domestic tourism. The Star.
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/06/11/focus-on-domestic-tourism.
Segar, M. (1917). 2 KB 328.
Musa, M. S., Pauzi, S. F. M., Ismail, I. R., Rahman, S., Husin, N. M., Karim, R. A.(2021). The Application of Standard of Care During Post Movement Control Order (MCO) in Malaysia Tourism Industry. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI). Volume 12, Issue 6, June 2021: 4619- 4629.
National Recovery Plan. (2021). Retrieved from http://www.pelanpemulihannegara.gov.my
OECD. (2020). Rebuilding tourism for the future: COVID-19 policy responses and recovery. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/rebuilding-tourism-for-the-future-covid-19-policy-responses-and-recovery-bced9859/
Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act. (1988). (Act 342). Retrieved from https://www.moh.gov.my
Manickam, S., Bhd, T. J. C. S., & Anor. (2015). 11 MLJ 721.
Pauzi, S. F. M., Musa, M. S., Rahman, S., Zainal, M. A., & Ismail, I. R. (2021). Occupier’s Legal Duties to Prevent Injury: Reviving Tourism Through Understanding Standard of Care. Proceeding INTERNATIONAL INVENTION, INNOVATIVE & CREATIVE (InIIC) CONFERENCE SERIES 2/2021. ‘Research & Design in Challenging Environment’ (pp. 69-73). MNNF Publisher.
Sutton v Bootle Corporation. (1947). 1 All ER 92.
Winterbottom v. Wright. (1842) 152 ER 402.
www.imf.org. (2021). Policy Responses to COVID19. May 7, 2021. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19

In-Text Citation: (Pauzi et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Pauzi, S. F. M., Musa, M. S., Rahman, S., Zainal, M. A., Ismail, I. R., & Yaacob, Z. (2022). Soco v2: Legal Pocket on Liabilities and Standard of Care for Tourism Industry During Pandemic Covid-19. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 1249 – 1257.