ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Students learn the art of giving a great persuasive speech to help them not only give presentations in future education levels but also in the workplace. It is considered crucial to comprehend and acknowledge the necessity of persuasion. In order to provide a more successful learning process for students who will be practising policy persuasive speaking in the future, this study explores instructors' roles in recognising the phases the students are weak in and applying pedagogical approaches. The Monroe's Motivated Sequence framework was used in this study to help undergraduate students develop persuasive writing and oral communication skills involving 64 students from various faculties in University Technology MARA, the Melaka branch. The results showed that steps 4 and 5 elements of persuasion were severely weak. Four teaching and learning strategies have been identified to overcome these weaknesses. However, these strategies must be put to the test on students during the forthcoming semester in order to determine their efficacy. This is consistent with the inclusion of employability skills in the previous study.
Black, P. (1997). Testing: Friend or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing. Falmer Press.
Cicero, De Inventione, translated by H. M. Hubbell, Ashok: Free books online, p. 19-20, accessed September 18, 2022. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.189092
Cuofano, G. (2022). Communication strategy framework and why it matters in
business. FourWeekMBA. https://fourweekmba.com/communication-strategy -framework/#Key_takeaways
Ekpang, J. N., Ghevolor, A., & Bassey, V. (2021). Literacy, oral language and rhetoric. Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies (JOLLS), 10(1), 9-17.
Francesca, Piazza. (2017). Rhetoric as a philosophy of language: An Aristotelian perspective. Res Rhetorica. (Special issue) Rhetoric in Italy B. Capaci and M. Zaleska (Eds) 1. Pp. 3-16.
Fransen, M., Smit, E. G., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2015). Strategies and motives for resistance
to persuasion: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1201), 1-12.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01201
Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Falmer Press.
Gipps, C. (1996). Assessment in transition: Learning, monitoring and selection in international
perspective. Pergamon Press.
Holt, R., & Macpherson, A. (2010). Sensemaking, rhetoric and the socially competent
entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 28(20). http://isb.sagepub.com/ cgi/content/abstract/28/1/20
Jacobs, M. G., Lee, S. G., & Ball, J. (1997). Cooperative learning: A sourcebook of lesson plans for teach education on cooperative learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Jobstreet.com. (2015), “Employers: fresh graduates have unrealistic expectations”, available
at:www.jobstreet.com.my/career-resources/employers-fresh-graduates-unrealistic-expectations/#.VqiR7yr5jIU (accessed 25 October 2016).
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making.
Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-832. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
Lunceford, B. (2007). The science of orality: Implications for rhetorical theory. Review of communications, 7(1), 83 – 102. Routledge.
Lutzke, J., & Henggeler, M. F. (2009). The rhetorical triangle: Understanding
and, using logos, ethos, and pathos. University Writing Center, School of Liberal Arts, Indiana University. https://www.lsu.edu/hss/english/files/university_writing_ files/item35402.pdf
Namaziandost, E., Neisi, L., Kheryadi, Nasri, M., & Shahreza, H. M. A. (2019). Enhancing
oral proficiency through cooperative learning among intermediate EFL learners: English learning motivation in focus. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2331186X.2019.1683933
In-Text Citation: (Jing et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Jing, H. F., Ibrahim, R., & Mohsin, N. (2022). Rehabilitating Persuasive Speaking Through Student Assessment: Communication in the Real World. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 3130 – 3146.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode