ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study is to determine rural residents' satisfaction with their quality of life in one of the regional development in Malaysia namely South Kelantan Development Authority (KESEDAR). In this study, regional development refers to a community's basic amenities and population income that are considered to be indicators in measuring community's quality of life. This study used a survey research design where a set of questionnaire was developed as a research instrument to collect data from rural community in KESEDAR. A number of 2449 respondents were involved in this study from four KESEDAR subregions that were districts of Gua Musang (n = 1007), Kuala Krai (n = 600), Jeli (n = 551), and Tanah Merah (n = 291). The collected data was descriptively analyzed using frequencies and percentages. Overall results suggested that the average monthly household income in all four regions is between MYR1500 and MYR3000. This implied that their wages are within the federal poverty line's acceptable range. Additionally, it was found that the residents' access to amenities was extremely limited. These suggested that in order to ensure the rural community received better benefits, the government's current rural community growth plans needed to be improved. As a result, it is proposed that focus should be placed on a comprehensive and effective rural development plan that incorporates components of income streams and core infrastructure.
Asian Development Bank. (1998). Annual Report 1998. Retrieved from
https://www.adb.org/documents/adb-annual-report-1998
Ashley, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. DFID, London.
Barzilai, G. (2003). Communities and law: politics and cultures of legal identities . University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17817
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 40, 189-216.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006859511756
Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Development Disabilities. Vol. 16 (1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8
Grusec, J. E. (2011). Socialization processes in the family: Social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 62, 243-269.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131650
Haidar, M. (2009). Sustainable livelihood approaches: The framework, lessons learnt from practice and policy recommendations. Economic and Social Council, UNDP.
Kaffash, R. H., Kargiban, A. Z., Kargiban, A. S., & Ramezani, T. M. (2010). A close look into the role of ICT in education. International Journal of Instruction , Vol.3(2), 64-82. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/59787
Jamil, N., & Mat, S. H. C. M. (2014). The reality of poverty: A theoretical study. Malaysian Journal of Economics, Vol. 48(1), 167-177. Retrieved from
http://www.ukm.my/fep/jem/index.html
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing – a social geographic perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning , Vol. 65 (1-2), 19-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7
Rockicka, E. (2014). The concept of ‘quality of life’ in the context of economic performance and social progress. In Eisse, D., Rokicka, E. & Leaman, J., Welfare state at risk. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319014807#aboutAuthors
Roben, W., & Ubong, I. (2019). The impact of Gana resettlement and integrated development (GRID) programme to the population livelihood Inventoriess in Kampung Gana, Kota Marudu, Sabah. GEOGRAFI, 7(1), 1-32.
https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/GEOG/article/download/1562/2115/
UNICEFF. (2018). Annual Report 2018. Diperolehi daripada
https://www.unicef.org/media/55486/file/UNICEF-annual-report-2018%20revised%201.pdf
Vaishar, A., Vidovicova, L., & Figueiredo, E. (2018). Quality of rural life. European Countryside, Vol.10(2), pp. 180-190. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0011
Harun, W. M. W., Awang, A., Man, S. (2016). Quality of life and level of education in the suburbs in Malaysia: An exploration of households in Mukim Rawang II, Selangor. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space , Vol.12(9), 92-103. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/view/17733
World Commission Environment Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development . Retrieved from https://idl-bnc-
idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/152/WCED_v17_doc149.pdf
Saleh, Y., Mahat, H., Hashim, M., Nayan, N., & Norkhaidi, S. B. (2020). Differences in the quality of life of residents based on demographic characteristics in small settlement centers: A case study of Muallim district, Perak, Malaysia. Journal of Social Science (EJOSS) , Vol. 6(1), 12-21. Retrieved from
https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/EJOSS/article/view/2765
In-Text Citation: (Zakey et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Zakey, S. M., Awang, M. M., Rashid, R. A., Yusoff, A. binti M., Rumaini, N. A. F. A., Mahaimin, A. A. A., Roslee, R., Roslam, M. K. K., & Abdullah, A. (2022). A Study on Quality of Life and Satisfaction Level with Physical Facilities among Rural Communities in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 718 – 726.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode