ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Young workers, aged between 18 to 29 years old, make up over 18 percent of the Malaysian working-age population. Poor workplace safety is a major concern for these young Malaysian workers, with relatively high levels of workplace accidents and injuries being recorded. This study investigates young workers’ proactive safety behavior practices, defined as anticipatory, change-oriented, and self-initiated behavior in sustaining workplace safety in situations where management safety controls are often neglected. The study was conducted with a cross-sectional design that had its focal point in identifying the predictors of proactive safety behavior in an individual’s daily working experiences. 215 young workers aged between 18 to 28 years old participated in this research represented various industries. The Hierarchical Multiple Linear Regresion indicated a significant relationship with this block of variables and proactive safety behavior at Time 1 [F (11,203) = 8.01, p<.01]. Proactive motivation (Can do) is the strongest predictor of proactive safety behavior (?=.41), followed by proactive motivation (Reason to) at ?=.20.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2011). Using The Job Demands-Resources Model To Predict Burnout And Performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.84
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior?: A measure and correlates, 14(August 1992), 103–118.
Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Pro-Self, Prosocial, and Pro-Organizational Foci of Proactive Beahviour: Differential Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 475–498.
https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909x439208
Grau, R., Martinez, I. M., Agut, S., & Salanova, M. (2002). Safety Attitudes and Their Relationship to Safety Training and Generalised Self-Efficacy. International Journal Of Occupational Safety And Ergonomics, 8(1), 23–35.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A New Model Of Work Role Performance?: Positive Behavior In Uncertain And Interdependent Contexts, 50(2), 327–347.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250
Hwang, P.-C., Han, M.-C., & Chiu, S.-F. (2015). Role Breadth Self Efficacy and Foci of Proactive Behavior Moderating Role of Collective Relational and Individual Self Concept. Journal of Psychology, 149(8), 846–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.985284
ILO. (2014). World of Work 2014: Developing with jobs. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/world-of-work/2014/WCMS_243961/lang--en/index.htm
ILO. (2018). Improving the Safety and Health of Young Workers. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/documents/publication/wcms_625223.pdf
Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835
Parker, S. K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 447. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00025
Schwaer, C., Biemann, T., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Antecedents of employee’s preference for knowledge-sharing tools. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(17), 3613–3635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.639552
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242--. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2018). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (September), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2332
In-Text Citation: (Mohd et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Mohd, R. H., Aziz, S. F. A., Selamat, M. N., & Omar, N. H. (2022). A Cross-Sectional Research on Proactive Safety Behavior of The Young Malaysian Workers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 1848 – 1853.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode