ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Marital satisfaction is a vital topic of study, because of the ever developing need to fortify the well-being of individuals and families. This research aims to explore the relationship between compatibility, leisure activities and marital satisfaction among Nigerian couples. The measures used in this research were the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale. The questionnaire was distributed to married Nigerians using an online survey form. A total of 218 individuals participated in this study, but only 217 samples were analysed. The mean score suggested that there is a high level of marital satisfaction among Nigerian couples, which is consistent with the results of past studies which have investigated the levels of marital satisfaction of Nigerian couples. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the influence of compatibility and leisure activities on marital satisfaction. Results show that it was a statistically significant model (F (2,214) = 20.36, p < 0.001). Compatibility (t=6.338, p<0.001) was a statistically significant predictor of marital satisfaction. Leisure activities was not a significant predictor of marital satisfaction. The proposed recommendation for future research would be to recruit a representative sample for future studies using stratified random sampling techniques to increase generalizability.
Abiodun, K., Ogunwuyi, B., Olaiya, S., & Araromi, C. (2022). Emotional Intelligence and Marital Satisfaction of Christian Couples in CAC, Nigeria. Applied Journal of Economics, Management and Social Sciences, 3(3), 10-16.
Amato, P. R., Lundberg, N., Ward, P. J., Schaalje, B. G., & Zabriskie, R. (2016). The Mediating Effects of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness During Couple Leisure on the Relationship Between Total Couple Leisure Satisfaction and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(5), 349–373. doi:10.18666/jlr-2016-v48- i5-7026 Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, (2). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_7
Apostolou, M., Constantinou, C., & Anagnostopoulos, S. (2018). Reasons That Could Lead People to Divorce in an Evolutionary Perspective: Evidence from Cyprus. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. DOI: 10.1080/10502556.2018.1469333
Bilal, A., & Rasool, S. (2020). Marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life: Mediating role of sexual satisfaction in married women. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 2(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631831820912873
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and non-distressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of marital and family research. 21(3), 289-308.
Breiding, M., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0.
Fahimdanesh, F., Noferesti, A., & Tavakol, K. (2020). Self-compassion and forgiveness: major predictors of marital satisfaction in young couples. American Journal of Family therapy, DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2019.1708832
Fournier, D. G., Olson, D. H., & Druckman, J. M. (1983). Assessing marital and premarital relationships: The PREPARE/ENRICH Inventories. In E. E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment, 229-250.
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. San Francisco: Freeman
Kyeong, S., Eom, H., Kim, M. K., Jung, Y. H., Park, S., & Kim, J. J. (2019). Neural basis of romantic partners’ decisions about participation in leisure activity. Sci Rep, 9, 14448 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51038-7
Levinger, G., & Rands, M. (1985). Compatibility in marriage and other close relationships. In Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Springer, New York, NY.
Lukman, F., Khan, A., Latif, A. A., & Bichi, A. A. (2020). Assessing the measurement model of negotiation styles and marital satisfaction among couples in Nigeria.International Journal of Innovation, creativity and Change.12 (1)
Miller, E., & McCaw, B. (2019). Intimate partner violence. The New England Journal of Medicine.
Doi: 10.1056/NeJMra1807166
Oladeji, D. (2013). Psychosocial factors influencing marital adjustment among couples in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Home Economics, 6(2), 250-259.
Olson, D. H., Fournier, D. G., & Druckman, J. M. (1986). Counselor’s manual for PREPARE-ENRICH. (rev.ed.) Minneapolis, MN: Prepare- ENRICH, inc.
Orthner, D. K., & Mancini, J. A. (1990). Leisure impacts on family interaction and cohesion. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 125-137.
Pareek, S., & Jain, G. (2018). What virtues make a marriage happy? International Journal of Research and Analytical Review, 5 (3) 320-328
Patricia, A., Thomas, Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2017). Family relationship and wellbeing. Innovative in Aging, 1 (3) 1-11. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igx025
Pirnahad, F., Armanmehr, M., Hejazi, S. M., Moradi, N., Hooshmand, E., & Armanmehr, V. (2017). Marital incompatibility among couples living in rural Gonabad and underlying factors. J Research & Health, 7(4) 953-961
Sandoval, V. L. (2017). The meaning of leisure. The Meaning of Leisure, 91-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59752-2_3
Sharaievska, I., Jungeun, K., & Stodolska, M. (2017). Leisure and Marital Satisfaction in Intercultural Marriages. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(4), 445–465. doi:10.18666/jlr- 2013-v45-i4-3894
Spanier, G. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales of assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations, 50(3), 281–289. doi:10.1111/j.1741- 3729.2001.00281.x
In-Text Citation: (Chioma & Sulong, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Chioma, R. U., & Sulong, R. M. (2022). Relationship Between Compatibility, Leisure and Marital Satisfaction among Married Nigerians. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 2652 – 2663.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode