ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The research follows the quantitative method in which data was collected using the survey instruments distributed among the key informants in an organization. The key informant refers to the decision-maker of the firms that successfully secure funding via equity crowdfunding from the year 2016-2019. The key informants include the founder, co-founder, director, chief executive officer (CEO), chief financial officer (CFO), and chief operating officer (COO). Also, they include other designated posts which hold the responsibility as a decision-maker of the firm with the appropriate knowledge to respond to the survey questions. The study's purpose is to increase the number of survey responders. 231 surveys were distributed to 77 MSMEs. Due to the pandemic, the government come out with the movement control order (MCO) where work from home (WFH) has been introduced. As such, the approach to distributing the survey questionnaires also changes. Instead of using the hardcopy and face to face approach, the google form has been used. In order to ensure that the survey reached the respondents, this study used "authority of sender” (AOS) representing the ECF platforms and "plea for help” (PLEA) approaches. The response rate increased from 0.02% (5 respondents) to 43.72% (101 respondents). Since the study examines the firm performance, out of 101 respondents, only 92 met the required criteria. The data answers the research questions and addresses the objectives to investigate the Equity crowdfunding (ECF) funded firms in Malaysia. Researchers in Malaysia should use the AOS and PLEA, especially in the area where the existence of AOS and PLEA would increase the respondents’ participation and completion of the distributed surveys.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139-1160.
Baeck, P., & Collins, L. (2013). Working the Crowd: A Short Guide to Crowdfunding and How It Can Work for You. London: Nesta.
Batinic, B., Reips, U. D., & Bosnjak, M. (Eds.). (2002). Online social sciences. Seattle, WA, USA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Baumgardner, T., Neufeld, C., Huang, P. C. T., Sondhi, T., Carlos, F., & Talha, M. A. (2017). Crowdfunding as a fast?expanding market for the creation of capital and shared value. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(1), 115-126.
Bednar, M. K., & Westphal, J. D. (2006). Surveying the corporate elite: Theoretical and practical guidance on improving response rates and response quality in top management survey questionnaires. In Research methodology in strategy and management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2013). Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital, 15(4), 313-333.
Bernardino, S., Santos, J. F., Ribeiro, J. C., & Freitas, A. (2020). Determinants of the Effective Use of UGC (User-Generated Content) on Hotel Room Bookings by Portuguese Travellers. International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), 10(2), 30-43.
Boulianne, S., Klofstad, C. A., & Basson, D. (2011). Sponsor prominence and responses patterns to an online survey. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(1), 79-87.
Brown, R., Mawson, S., & Rowe, A. (2019). Start-ups, entrepreneurial networks and equity crowdfunding: a processual perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 115-125.
Callegaro, M., Manfreda, K. L., & Vehovar, V. (2015). Web survey methodology. Sage.
Coakley, J., & Lazos, A. (2021). New developments in equity crowdfunding: a review. Review of Corporate Finance, 1(3-4), 341-405.
Crouch, S., Robinson, P., & Pitts, M. (2011). A comparison of general practitioner response rates to electronic and postal surveys in the setting of the National STI Prevention Program. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 35(2), 187-189.
De Buysere, K., Gajda, O., Kleverlaan, R., Marom, D., & Klaes, M. (2012). A framework for European crowdfunding. Publication of the European Crowdfunding Network, 1-40, www.crowdfundingframework.eu.
Dillman, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., Berck, J., & Messer, B. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social science research, 38(1), 1-18.
Freedman, D. M., & Nutting, M. R. (2015). Equity Crowdfunding for Investors: A Guide to Risks, Returns, Regulations, Funding Portals, Due Diligence, and Deal Terms. John Wiley & Sons.
Fong, V. (2019). How is Malaysia equity crowdfunding scene doing in 2019? Fintech News Malaysia. Available at https://fintechnews.my/20194/crowdfundingmalaysia/equity-crowdfunding-report-2019/ [Accessed 16 Jan. 2020].
Gajda, O., & Walton, J. (2013). Review of Crowdfunding for Development Initiatives.
https://eurocrowd.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/sites/85/2013/10/EoD_HD061_Jul2013_Review_CrowdFunding.pdf
Golic, Z. (2014). Advantages of crowdfunding as an alternative source of financing of small and medium-sized enterprises. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Isto?nom Sarajevu, (8), 39-48.
Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public opinion quarterly, 56(4), 475-495.
Groves, R. M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 299-308.
Gueguen, N., Jacob, C., & Morineau, T. (2010). What is in a name? An effect of similarity in computer-mediated communication. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 6(2), 1-4.
Eldridge, D., Nisar, T. M., & Torchia, M. (2019). What impact does equity crowdfunding have on SME innovation and growth? An empirical study. Small Business Economics, 1-16.
Fang, J., & Wen, C. (2012). Predicting potential respondents’ decision to participate in web surveys. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 18(1-2), 16-32.
Fang, J., Shao, P., & Lan, G. (2009). Effects of innovativeness and trust on web survey participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 144-152.
Gierczak, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J.M. (2016). Crowdfunding: Outlining the new era of fundraising. In D. Brüntje, & O. Gajda (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 7-23). Springer International Publishing.
Joinson, A. N., & Reips, U. D. (2007). Personalized salutation, power of sender and response rates to Web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1372-1383.
Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., & Reips, U. D. (2007). Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 275-285.
Kaplowitz, M. D., Lupi, F., Couper, M. P., & Thorp, L. (2012). The effect of invitation design on web survey response rates. Social Science Computer Review, 30(3), 339-349.
Kropf, M. E., & Blair, J. (2005). Eliciting survey cooperation: Incentives, self-interest, and norms of cooperation. Evaluation review, 29(6), 559-575.
Kourabas, S., & Ramsay, I. (2018). Equity crowdfunding in Malaysia. Company Lawyer, 39(6), 187-196.
Kourabas, S., & Ramsay, I. (2018). Equity crowdfunding in Australia and New Zealand. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 29(9), 571-589.
Kuti, M., & Madarasz, G. (2014). Crowdfunding. Public Finance Quarterly, 59(3), 355- 366.
Von Hippel, E., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003). How open source software works:" free" user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy, 32(6), 923-943.
Leigh, J. P., Fiest, K., Brundin-Mather, R., Plotnikoff, K., Soo, A., Sypes, E. E., & Stelfox, H. T. (2020). A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors. PloS one, 15(10), e0241259.
Li, Y., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 95-111.
Lim, K. H., Lim, E. P., Jiang, B., & Achananuparp, P. (2016, July). Using online controlled experiments to examine authority effects on user behavior in email campaigns. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 255-260).
Liu, M., & Inchausti, N. (2017). Improving survey response rates: the effect of embedded questions in web survey email invitations. Survey Practice, 10(1), 1-6.
Liu, M., & Wronski, L. (2018). Examining completion rates in web surveys via over 25,000 real-world surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 36(1), 116-124.
Ljumovic, I., & Pejovic, B. (2020). Financing of innovation: are crowdfunding and venture capital complements or substitutes? PaKSoM 2020, 111.
Mavis, B. E., & Brocato, J. J. (1998). Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys: The tortoise and the hare revisited. Evaluation & the health professions, 21(3), 395- 408.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Mollick, E. R. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
Mowen, J. C., & Cialdini, R. B. (1980). On implementing the door-in-the-face compliance technique in a business context. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(2), 253-258.
Obiora, S. C., & Csordas, T. (2017). The case of alternative versus traditional financing: a literature review. Archives of Business Research, 5(9), 42-53.
Pazowski, P., & Czudec, W. (2014). Economic prospects and conditions of crowdfunding. Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference, 1079-1088.
Petric, G., & Petrovcic, A. (2014). Elements of the management of norms and their effects on the sense of virtual community. Online Information Review.
Petrov?i?, A., Petri?, G., & Manfreda, K. L. (2016). The effect of email invitation elements on response rate in a web survey within an online community. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 320-329.
Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2003). The impact of contact type on web survey response rates. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 579-588.
Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2005). E-mail subject lines and their effect on web survey viewing and response. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 380-387.
Rafaeli, S., Hayat, T., & Ariel, Y. (2009). Knowledge building and motivations in Wikipedia: Participation as “Ba”. In Cyberculture and new media (pp. 51-67). Brill.
Ramayah, T. (2011). Notes for data analysis workshop. Retrieved October, 14, 2018.
Saleh, A., & Bista, K. (2017). Examining factors impacting online survey response rates in educational research: Perceptions of graduate students. Online Submission, 13(2), 63-74.
Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. In D. Cumming (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance. Oxford University Press.
Shafi, M., Liu, J., & Ren, W. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises operating in Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 2, 100018.
Securities Commission Malaysia. (2017). Annual Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/Api/Documentms/Download.Ashx?Id=097e62ec-8464-46a2-A3e0-9cb4ee164ca7.
Securities Commission Malaysia. (2019). Annual Report 2019. Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/ask-aliss#search/crowdfunding.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, R. M., & Kiniorski, K. (2003, May). Participation in online surveys: Results from a series of experiments. In 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Nashville, Tennessee (pp. 15-18).
Spaulding, S. (2010). Embodied cognition and mindreading. Mind & Language, 25(1), 119-140.
Stern, M. J., Bilgen, I., & Dillman, D. A. (2014). The state of survey methodology: Challenges, dilemmas, and new frontiers in the era of the tailored design. Field methods, 26(3), 284-301.
Strausz, R. (2017). A theory of crowdfunding: a mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1430- 1476.
Trouteaud, A. R. (2004). How you ask counts: A test of internet-related components of response rates to a web-based survey. Social Science Computer Review, 22(3), 385-392.
Valanciene, L., & Jegeleviciute, S. (2013). Valuation of crowdfunding: Benefits and drawbacks. Economics and Management, 18(1), 39-48.
Welbourne, J. L., Blanchard, A. L., & Wadsworth, M. B. (2013). Motivations in virtual health communities and their relationship to community, connectedness and stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 129-139.
Wulandari, T., Saeedi, M., & Meskaran, F. (2020). Factors affecting equity crowdfunding investment in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(10), 1816-1823.
Wright, B., & Schwager, P. H. (2008). Online survey research: Can response factors be improved? Journal of Internet Commerce, 7(2), 253-269.
Zey, E., & Windmann, S. (2021). Effects of message framing, sender authority, and recipients’ self-reported trait autonomy on endorsement of health and safety measures during the early COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(15), 7740.
In-Text Citation: (Kassim & Muhamed, 2023)
To Cite this Article: Kassim, S. F. M., & Muhamed, N. A. (2023). Research Survey Distribution during the Pandemic: The ECF Platform Provider as an Authority of the Sender and using a Plea for Help. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3), 989 – 1005.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode