ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Online reading materials are considered as one of the important sources for EFL students. This is caused by the increasing number of learners who read texts and learn from online sources. The purpose of this quantitative research is to investigate the perceived use of online reading strategies among undergraduate students. To achieve the objective of the research, a 5 Likert-scale survey based on reading difficulties (Abeeleh and Al-Sobh, 2021) and online reading strategies proposed by Amer et al (2010) is utilised. This survey focuses on reading difficulties, global reading strategies, problem-solving reading strategies and support reading strategies. The survey obtained responses from 232 participants. Findings of the research suggested that, relating to reading difficulties, it is pertaining to the students’ perception that made them feel that reading academic texts is a difficult task. Looking at the global strategies and problem-solving strategies, these learners have the tendency to refocus their attention, so that they are able to obtain better comprehension of the academic texts. In relation to supporting reading strategies, the learners depended on their translation abilities, as well as referred to other materials to gain more understanding. Several pedagogical implications are also addressed in the present study.
Abeeleh, T. W. A., and Al-Sobh, M. (2021) Reading Comprehension Problems Encountered by EFL Students at Aljoun National University. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, Vol 8(1), pp6-15. Retrieved from https://ijllnet.com/journals/Vol_8_No_1_March_2021/2.pdf
Amer, A., AL Barwani, T., Ibrahim, M. (2010) Student Teachers’ Perceived Use of Online Reading Strategies. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), Vol 6(4), pp 102-113. Retrieved from httpe://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu
Andres, I. C. (2020). Enhancing Reading Comprehension through an Intensive Reading Approach. HOW, 27(1), 69-82.
Atayeva, M., Putro, N. H. P. S., Kassymova, G., & Kosbay, S. (2019, November). Impact of reading on students’ writing ability. In Materials of International Practical Internet Conference “Challenges of Science (Vol. 144, No. 2, pp. 5-13).
Bunch, G. C., Schlaman, H., Lang, N., & Kenner, K. (2020). “Sometimes I do not understand exactly where the difficulties are for my students”: Language, literacy, and the new mainstream in community colleges. Community College Review, 48(3), 303-329.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11.
Getie, A. S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1738184.
Gustanti, Y., & Ayu, M. (2021). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN COGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES AND STUDENTS’ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST SCORE. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 95-100
Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Learners' Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. English language teaching, 9(6), 123-133.
Huang, H., Chern, C., & Lin, C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition). Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
Karbalaei, A. (2010). Iranian EFL and Indian ESL college students’ beliefs about reading strategies in L2. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 12(2), 51–68.
Rahmat, N. H., Arepin, M., & Sulaiman, S. (2020) The Cycle of Academic Reading Fear among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University of University Education, Vol 16(3), pp 265-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.9730
Saddhono, K., Ridwan, M., Suherman, A., Anwar, K., & Putri, N. Q. H. (2020). The Development of Interactive E-book of Teaching Indonesian for Speaker of Other Language (TISOL) Containing Local Wisdom with Scientific-Thematic Approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1573, No. 1, p. 012002). IOP Publishing.
Semtin, S. A., & Maniam, M. (2015). Reading strategies among ESL Malaysian Secondary School students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 4(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v4i2.4492
Sengupta, S. (2002). Developing academic reading at tertiary level: A longitudinal study tracing conceptual change. The reading matrix, 2(1).
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Native and Non-Native Readers. System, 29, 431-449.
Shirmohammadi, M., & Salehi, M. (2017). Comparative effect of scaffolding instruction and self-regulated learning on ESP learners' reading comprehension. Studies, 5(4), 203-213.
In-Text Citation: (Rahman et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Rahman, S. A. S. A., Yunos, D. R. M., Whancit, W., Rahmat, N. H., & Ngadiran, N. M. (2023). Perceived Difficulties and Use of Online Reading Strategies: A Study among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 997 – 1013.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode