Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Is There Constructivism in Online Interaction in Biology Teaching and Learning?

Masitah Abu Kassim, Tengku Norbaya Tengku Azhar, Jebakumari Selvarani a/p Ebenezer, Noor Hanim Rahmat, Nur Azalina Suzianti Feisal, Nur Najla binti Zainal Anuar

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i8/17746

Open access

As the COVID-19 pandemic ends, online learning has grown in popularity among students and educators. It offers flexibility and affordability, opening new dimensions to teaching and learning. However, in some tough subjects, such as biology, which focuses on understanding the concept of life through practical effort, online learning appears to be rather difficult. This study overviewed constructivism in online learning of biology subject specifically in genetic study. The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between numerous elements, including learner-to-learner interactions, instructor-to-learner interactions, and learner-to-content interactions, and the efficacy of online learning. This quantitative study enrolled approximately 124 pre-university students from public institutions in Selangor. The instrument used is a 5 Likert-scale survey with four sections including Section A of demographic profile; Section B of learning in groups; section C of teachers as facilitators and section D on shared knowledge and authority. Overall, the highest mean value, (x? =4.2) reported as learners consider that peer interaction in biology online learning activities is crucial for task completion and motivation support. The learner also believes that the simplicity of the online content is significant in online learning with x? =4.1. There is also a significant association between learning in groups and teachers as facilitator (r=.475**) and (p=.000). In addition, there is also a significant association between teachers as facilitator and shared knowledge & authority (r=.687**) and (p=.000). Thus, to attract more students to learn using an online platform, the usage of online learning in biology must be improved with specific improvements in forms of content, activity, and execution.

Abdul Rahim, A. S., & Choo, C. Y. (2021). First Year Pharmacy Students Perceptions on Odl During the Covid 19 Pandemic a Thematic Analysis. Malaysian Journal of Pharmacy, 7(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.52494/owug5215
Ahmed, J. (2009). Teaching of biology sciences. New Delhi, PHI Learning private Limited.
Andyhapsari, D., & Djukri. (2021). Effective Learning Strategies in Biology Online Learning to Anticipate Covid-19: A Literature Review. 10.2991/assehr.k.210326.011.
Brunner,J. (1966) The Toward a Theory of Instruction . Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Bringman-Rodenbarger, L., & Hortsch, M. (2020). How students choose E-learning resources: The importance of ease, familiarity, and convenience. FASEB bioAdvances, 2(5), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2019-00094
Chokwe, J. M. (2015). Students’ and tutors’ perceptions of feedback on academic essays in an open and distance learning context. Open Praxis, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.154
Du, Z., Wang, F., Wang, S., & Xiao, X. (2022). Enhancing Learner Participation in Online Discussion Forums in Massive Open Online Courses: The Role of Mandatory Participation. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 819640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819640
Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in Online Learning: Student Attitudes and Behavior During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Hongsuchon, T., El Emary, I. M. M., Hariguna, T., & Qhal, E. M. A. (2022). Assessing the Impact of Online-Learning Effectiveness and Benefits in Knowledge Management, the Antecedent of Online-Learning Strategies and Motivations: An Empirical Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052570
Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. Proceedings - 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology, ISET 2017, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17
Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
Kokoc, M. (2019). Flexibility in e-Learning: Modelling Its Relation to Behavioural Engagement and Academic Performance.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning 22(1), 205- 222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Mathew, V. N., & Chung, E. (2020). University Students’ Perspectives on Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Implementation Amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11964
Rahmat, N. H. (2022) Exploring Task Environment for Online Academic Writing: The Case fo Coloured Scaffolds. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vp 12 (3), pp 694-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i3/12928
Ramayah, B., & Kumar, R. M. (2020). Challenges Towards Online Teaching During Covid-19 Pandemic In Malaysia. University, Lecturer’s Perspectives.
Xhaferi, B., & Xhaferi, G. (2020). Online Learning Benefits and Challenges During the COVID 19 - Pandemic-Students’ Perspective from SEEU. SEEU Review, 15(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2020-0006
Yunus, H. (2021). Online Learning Management System (OLMS) in Indonesian Higher Education: Investigating Benefits and Obstacles. PJEIS: Parahikma Journal of Education and Integrated Sciences, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://journal.parahikma.ac.id/pjeis/article/view/42.

In-Text Citation: (Kassim et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Kassim, M. A., Azhar, T. N. T., Ebenezer, J. S. a/p, Rahmat, N. H., Feisal, N. A. S., & Anuar, N. N. binti Z. (2023). Is There Constructivism in Online Interaction in Biology Teaching and Learning? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(8), 1571 – 1583.