ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Group dynamics play a crucial role in the success and effectiveness of any group or team. Understanding the relationship between the different components within a group is essential for effective collaboration, decision-making, and overall group performance. The objective of this study is to explore the perception of students of the dynamics of a group in different stages of work based on Tuckman’s model, which is forming stage, storming stage, norming stage, and performing stage. The study utilizes quantitative data through surveys. A total of 167 students from the Centre of Foundation Studies, UiTM Dengkil participated in the survey. In general, the findings revealed that good leadership practice, effective communication among group members, clearly defined roles among group members, and group cohesion serve as critical factors in facilitating effective collaboration in completing the group work assignment. These findings provide valuable insights for educators seeking to enhance students’ group dynamics and optimize their performance. By understanding the relationship between components within group dynamics, students can also develop strategies to foster effective leadership, communication, role allocation, and cohesion within a group.
Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2015). Cooperative learning and social skills development. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Developments in research and practice (pp. 201-238). New York, New York: Nova Science. Retrieved from
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12162/5567
Cheng, X., Fu, S., & De Vreede, G. (2021). Determinants of trust in computer-mediated offshore software-outsourcing collaboration. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102301.
Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206-235.
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of management, 36(1), 5-39.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.
Finkelman, P. (2017). Promoting effective communication in interprofessional healthcare teams. Journal of continuing education in nursing, 48(6), 253-254.
David, W. J., & Roger, T. J. (1999) Making cooperative learning work, Theory Into Practice, 38:2, 67-73, DOI: 10.1080/00405849909543834
Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard business review, 85(7/8), 114.
Etareri, L. (2022). Fundamental stages of development through the relevance of team building. Medicon Open Access, 3(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.55162/MCET.03.058.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2007). The influence of group dynamics on group performance in collaborative learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 200-214.
Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
McShane, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management: history and a design science proposal. The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(2), 137-153.
Morais, A. A., Caldeira, B. C., Lima, R. M., Nagai, W. A. (2019) Team-based learning in an engineering course: An experience in Brazil. International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education, 9, pp. 84 - 91
Rahmat, N. H. (2020) Conflict Resolution Strategies in Class Discussions. International Journal of Education, Vol 12(3), pp 49-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i3.16914
Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of management review, 33(1), 163-184.
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
Vaida, S., & Serban, D. (2021). Group development stages. A brief comparative analysis of various models. Studia Universitatis Babe?-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia, 66(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2021.1.05
In-Text Citation: (Othman et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Othman, E. S., Husni, H., Bakar, S. F. M. A., Aris, M. N. M., Shaharudin, R. H., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Exploring The Relationship of Components in Group Dynamics: A Case Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9), 956–969.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode