Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Responses to Viewing an Indoor Vertical Greenery System: A Case Study

Aini Jasmin Ghazalli, Cris Brack

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i7/17951

Open access

Physical or virtual contact with greenery has positive impacts on human health. The presence of urban green spaces provides recreational opportunities, while for viewers the contact influences emotional states. For locations with limited floor space, green infrastructure such as a green roofs or vertical greenery can multiply exposure opportunities. In this case study, we sought to understand the responses of occupants to an indoor vertical greenery system (iVGS). This study explored the responses to the iVGS using a survey based on the Short-Version Revised Restoration Scale (SRRS), with responses collected onsite and online. The study examined the differences in responses between the respondents who were physically present at the iVGS (onsite) and those who viewed photographs of the iVGS online. The study also presents data on the number of passers-by before and after the iVGS was installed. Both online and onsite results revealed mostly positive responses towards the installation of the iVGS, with the onsite respondents giving higher scores than the online respondents. The restoration scores of iVGS demonstrates that it refreshes cognitive energy and brings positive impact and emotions. Responses to the SRSS provides tentative evidence that iVGS may have some restorative benefits, which is consistent with our understanding of the benefits of vertical greenery more generally. However, more research is required to confirm this.

Abdul-Rahman, Wang, C., Rahim, A. M., Loo, S. C., & Miswan, N. (2014). Vertical greenery systems (VGS) in urban tropics. Open House International, 39(4), 42–52.
Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159–168.
Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: a literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 4(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394
Bradley, M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Semantic Differential Manikin and the. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(I), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.001
Bringslimark, T., Patil, G. G., & Hartig, T. (2008). The association between indoor plants, stress, productivity and sick leave in office workers. Acta Horticulturae, 775, 117–122.
Browning, M. H. E. M., Mimnaugh, K. J., van Riper, C. J., Laurent, H. K., & LaValle, S. M. (2020). Can Simulated Nature Support Mental Health? Comparing Short, Single-Doses of 360-Degree Nature Videos in Virtual Reality With the Outdoors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667
Chan, S. H. M., Qiu, L., Esposito, G., & Mai, K. P. (2021). Vertical greenery buffers against stress: Evidence from psychophysiological responses in virtual reality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 213, 104127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104127
Chang, C. Y., & Chen, P. K. (2005). Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience, 40(5), 1354–1359.
Chen, Z., He, Y., & Yu, Y. (2016). Enhanced functional connectivity properties of human brains during in-situ nature experience. PeerJ, 4(7), e2210. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2210
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
de Groot, W. T., & van den Born, R. J. G. (2003). Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3), 127–138.
Deng, L., Luo, H., Ma, J., Huang, Z., Sun, L. X., Jiang, M. Y., Zhu, C. Y., & Li, X. (2020). Effects of integration between visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126702
Dictionary.com. (n.d.). Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com. Retrieved August 4, 2020, from https://www.dictionary.com/
Dravigne, A., Waliczek, T. M., Lineberger, R. D., & Zajicek, J. M. (2008). The effect of live plants and window views of green spaces on employee perceptions of job satisfaction. HortScience, 43(1), 183–187. https://doi.org/


Egea, G., Perez-Urrestarazu, L., Gonzalez-Perez, J., Franco-Salas, A., & Fernandez-Canero, R. (2014). Lighting systems evaluation for indoor living walls. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.
Evans, G. W. (2003). The Built Environment and Mental Health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(4), 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jtg063
Evensen, K. H., Raanaas, R. K., Hagerhall, C. M., Johansson, M., & Patil, G. G. (2015). Restorative Elements at the Computer Workstation: A Comparison of Live Plants and Inanimate Objects With and Without Window View. Environment and Behavior, 47(3), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513499584
Fernández-Bregón, N., Urrestarazu, M., & Valera, D. L. (2012). Effects of a vertical greenery system on selected thermal and sound mitigation parameters for indoor building walls. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10(3–4), 1025–1027.
Fischl, G., Varkevisser, M., Gärling, A., & Keyson, D. (2007). The Restorative Potential of a Built Environment: Development and Evaluation of a Research-based Design (P. Havinga, M. Lijding, & N. Meratnia, Eds.). Twente University of Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Fjeld, T., Veiersted, B., Sandvik, L., Riise, G., & Levy, F. (1998). The Effect of Indoor Foliage Plants on Health and Discomfort Symptoms among Office Workers. Indoor and Built Environment, 7(4), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1159/000024583
Gatersleben, B., & Andrews, M. (2013). When walking in nature is not restorative-The role of prospect and refuge. Health and Place, 20, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.001
Ghazalli, A. J., Brack, C., Bai, X., & Said, I. (2018). Alterations in use of space, air quality, temperature and humidity by the presence of vertical greenery system in a building corridor. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 32, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.015
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1), 1–18.
Grinde, B., & Patil, G. G. (2009). Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(9), 2332–2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6092332
Han, K.-T. (2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4
Han, K.-T. (2007). Responses to Six Major Terrestrial Biomes in Terms of Scenic Beauty, Preference, and Restorativeness. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292016
Han, K.-T. (2008). Influence of Limitedly Visible Leafy Indoor Plants on the Psychology, Behavior, and Health of Students at a Junior High School in Taiwan. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 658–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508314476
Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., & Lundström, J. N. (2019). Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7
Herzog, T. R., Maguire, P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5
Jackson, L. E. (2003). The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X
Kabisch, N., Qureshi, S., & Haase, D. (2015). Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. In Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/030621
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.
Larsen, L., Adams, J., Deal, B., Kweon, B. S., & Tyler, E. (1998). Plants in the Workplace: The Effects of Plant Density on Productivity, Attitudes, and Perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000301
Lee, K. E., Williams, K. J. H., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S. G., & Johnson, K. A. (2015). 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003
Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015
Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-Mims, C. H. (1996). Particulate matter accumulation on horizontal surfaces in interiors: influence of foliage plants. Atmospheric Environment, 30(14), 2565–2568.
Lottrup, L., Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.002
Matusiak, B. S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2015). How we evaluate the view out through the window. Architectural Science Review, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2015.1032879
Mediastika, C. E., & Binarti, F. (2013). Reducing Indoor Noise Levels Using People’s Perception on Greenery. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 11, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2013-0003
Montacchini, E., Tedesco, S., & Rondinone, T. (2017). Greenery for a university campus: does it affect indoor environmental quality and user well-being? Energy Procedia, 122, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.324
Paddle, E., & Gilliland, J. (2016). Orange Is the New Green: Exploring the Restorative Capacity of Seasonal Foliage in Schoolyard Trees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050497
Parsons, R. (1991). The potential influences of environmental perception on human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(1), 1–23.
Qin, J., Zhou, X., Sun, C., Leng, H., & Lian, Z. (2013). Influence of green spaces on environmental satisfaction and physiological status of urban residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(4), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.005
Raanaas, R. K., Evensen, K. H., Rich, D., Sjøstrøm, G., & Patil, G. (2011). Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.005
Radhi, H., Assem, E., & Sharples, S. (2014). On the colours and properties of building surface materials to mitigate urban heat islands in highly productive solar regions. Building and Environment, 72, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.005
Rennit, P., & Maikov, K. (2015). Perceived restoration scale method turned into (used as the) evaluation tool for parks and open green spaces, using Tartu city parks as an example. City, Territory and Architecture, 2(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-014-0020-3
Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2004). Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(5), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00419.x
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-016-9602-2/TABLES/1
Thesaurus.com. (n.d.). Thesaurus.com. Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://www.thesaurus.com/
Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., & Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005
Ulrich, R. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well?being. Landscape Research, 4(1), 17–23.
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135001
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective responses to natural environments. In Human Behavior & Environment: Advances in Theory & Research (Vol. 6, pp. 85–125). https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:2206070
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137).
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.
van den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012
van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1
Wang, C., Er, S.-S., & Abdul-Rahman, H. (2016). Indoor vertical greenery system in urban tropics. Indoor and Built Environment, 25(2), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X14550508
Weber, F., Kowarik, I., & Säumel, I. (2014). Herbaceous plants as filters: immobilization of particulates along urban street corridors. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex?: 1987), 186, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.011
Weinmaster, M. (2009). Are green walls as “green” as they look? an introduction to the various technologies and ecological benefits of green walls. Journal of Green Building, 4(4), 3–18.
WHO. (2021). Urban health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/urban-health
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough.’ Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
Yin, J., Arfaei, N., MacNaughton, P., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Effects of biophilic interventions in office on stress reaction and cognitive function: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality. Indoor Air, 29(6), 1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12593
Yin, J., Yuan, J., Arfaei, N., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, 136, 105427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427

In-Text Citation: (Ghazalli et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Ghazalli, A. J., Brack, C., & Ghazalli, A. J. (2023). Responses to Viewing an Indoor Vertical Greenery System: A Case Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 1794 – 1818.